Surviving Accountability: As Easy as AYP
        
        
        
        ##AUTHORSPLIT##<--->
Data-driven strategies and personalized instruction are paving the wayto higher test scores, one student at a time. CONSIDER ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS  a misnomer, or least an understatement; satisfying  its mandates demands a far greater than  adequate effort. Established in the No Child Left  Behind Act, AYP requires that districts and  schools show a minimum, prescribed level of  growth in student achievement, until the year  2013-2014, when every eligible public school  student must pass state assessments in math  and reading. And reaching those prescribed minimumsis a difficult, complex task.
CONSIDER ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS  a misnomer, or least an understatement; satisfying  its mandates demands a far greater than  adequate effort. Established in the No Child Left  Behind Act, AYP requires that districts and  schools show a minimum, prescribed level of  growth in student achievement, until the year  2013-2014, when every eligible public school  student must pass state assessments in math  and reading. And reaching those prescribed minimumsis a difficult, complex task.
Schools struggling with AYP should look to  the example of dozens of their counterparts  around the country that have taken a personal  approach to raising test scores. Instead of  applying broad academic policies and inviting  teachers to statewide conferences to learn  about new teaching methods, these schools  use data to gauge student progress at any point  during the school year, and then use the information  to customize curriculum and instructional  programs. The data informs the schools  when and where interventions are necessary.
Technology is a key player in this approach.  It does more than relieve teachers of onerous  paper-and-pencil practices and make performing  assessments faster and more effective.  Once school officials assess student progress,  technology helps teachers get down to the  business of teaching—and ultimately helping  students boost their test scores.
Digging Into Data
Personalizing instruction has worked wonders at Adams 12  Five Star Schools (CO), where educators use their student  information systems and assessment tools to drill down to a  particular student’s weaknesses, to evaluate teaching methods  and curriculum, and to apply new skills and technologies toimprove test scores.
“Several times throughout the year, we evaluate our student  data and determine the best way to improve each student's  achievement level,” says Superintendent Mike Paskewicz.“During the 2004-2005 school year, Five Star Schools mademore gains on the subsets of the state tests than any other districtin the Denver area.”
The district stores student data in a sophisticated data warehouse.  The data contains detailed information such as reading  scores sorted by grade level,  gender, ethnicity, and education  categories such as special  ed and at-risk students. This  information is then available  to each school for the creation  of its annual school improvement  plan, which cites specific strategies to improve teaching  and learning. “Teachers also monitor the data throughout the  year,” Paskewicz says, “so they can modify their teaching  strategies in very targeted ways to boost student achievement  for specific classes and individual students.”
Five Star educators also use the data warehouse themselves.  They go through intensive staff training to help them pinpoint  specific areas where students need extra help. They then can analyze  the data and talk with other staff to identify how to improve  the student learning environment. For example, the data may  indicate that a student or group of students had difficulty  answering assessment questions that required a constructed  response. With this information, teachers can modify their daily  instruction to address that particular need.
  Based on its own student data, Adams 12 Five Star Schools launched a math-improvement initiative. Significantly better scores on the state math test have resulted, including double-digit gains at some schools.
To address one such need, four years ago the district  launched Everyday Math, a hands-on initiative that gives  teachers new instructional math strategies based on the latest  educational research. The program focuses on drills and memorization  and tries to break down equations into a format that  is easier for students to understand. For example, students  tackle multidigit multiplication by learning to multiply the  round numbers first. They learn 10 times 12 in three steps: 1)  Multiply 10 x 10, which equals 100; 2) multiply 10 x 2, which  equals 20; and 3) add 100 and 20, for a total of 120.
Students also learn to conceptualize numbers and relate  them to everyday life. For example, students learn trigonometry  principles by building a Ferris wheel. The hands-on  approach is working. “We have seen significant overall growth  on state math assessments,” says Five Star’s communications  manager, Joe Ferdani. “And we attribute much of that growth  to Everyday Math.”
The district also turned its attention to student test scores  in English language proficiency, and decided to take a similar  practical approach by integrating technology and software for  reading and vocabulary into their teaching methods. In the  most recent school year, the district focused its efforts on  English Language Learners, piloting a reading and vocabulary  program with the intention of gathering results and  evaluating its success.
One program that educators used  was Education World’s WebQuest, interactive  software geared to vocabulary  and phonics. WebQuest takes students  on a virtual real-world experience and  then asks them to write about it. It  augments the writing experience with Storybook Weaver, a  program made by The Learning Company that aims to inspire and motivate students to  write and illustrate their own multimedia stories with an easyto-  use word processor and a variety of graphic tools.
Getting Personal
California’s Elk Grove Unified School District (EGUSD)  offers another impressive example of the benefit of using individualized  strategies. Once known mostly for its overflowing  student population and outstanding teacher pay, the district  recently has earned a reputation as one of the top academicperformers in the state.
Elk Grove evaluates student data via a sophisticated student  information system called SISWeb. Data is gathered and manually  loaded into the system. SISWeb houses student test  results, parent information, medical data, emergency contacts,  any special education needs, and more.
SISWeb limits access to the data it stores. The system  assigns each student to the appropriate teacher, and only that  teacher can access the student’s information. The teacher logs  in and views student test scores in the broad areas, such as  reading, writing, math, and science, and sees whether the  scores are at the advanced, basic, or below-basic levels.
SISWeb also provides data that helps the district assess the  progress made toward meeting its Bold Student Achievement  Goals, an internal document in which Elk Grove lays out and  quantifies its academic objectives. SISWeb automatically  highlights particular curriculum deficiencies and prompts  schools to address them by asking a series of questions about  students’ academic strengths and weaknesses.
Teachers can then focus on those soft spots in the curriculum  and differentiate instruction. “We customize information  for teachers,” says Greg Lindner, director of technology services  at EGUSD. “We take a very unique approach. It’s not  cookie-cutter.”
Christine Hikido, director of research and evaluation, says,“We try to look at data and analyze it in different ways to  understand the numbers and figure out how to apply the curriculum  differently to change the outcomes.” Hikido understands  that it’s just information; it won’t solve academic  issues. If a teacher continues to have students scoring belowbasic  on tests, then further efforts at individualized instruction  are made. For example, if 10 students score below-basic in  reading, the teacher breaks the class into separate groups and  teaches right to the struggling group’s level.
Elk Grove also uses Riverdeep’s Edmark  Reading Program, which teaches beginning reading and language  development to nonreaders. Level 1 provides students with oneon-  one teacher-to-student lessons. It teaches 150 words chosen  from the Dolch word list and first-grade readers, as well as regular  plural, tense, gerund endings, capitalization, and punctuation.  Students catch on quickly to a process that teaches a word, introduces  its meaning, provides comprehension practice, and uses the  word in the context of a story. The program incorporates all learningmodalities into this instructional sequence.
If an Elk Grove teacher has tried these tactics and programs  but continues to see below-basic test scores, the district is  there to help. “We provide a support team made up of different  members of the district to tailor programs to each school  and each teacher’s need,” Hikido says. “We work with teachers  to customize their instruction, provide them training, and  generally give them the extra help that they require.”
  Since implementing a customized assessement solution two years ago, Minneapolis Public Schools has seen the number of its schools failing to make AYP drop from 62 percent to 29 percent.
Part of this support involves professional coaching. The district  sends a math, reading, or other subject-matter expert to  the classroom to see how the teacher is using the curriculum  (all teachers are expected to use the standard curriculum). The  coach checks to ensure that the teacher understands, for example,  Open Court, the district-sanctioned reading program from  SRA/McGraw-Hill that uses word segmenting  and blending to teach reading skills. The coach  watches the teacher perform in the classroom for a period of  time and comes back with suggestions or writes down a number  of strategies.
All of these approaches were recently applied to Elk Grove’s  Valley High School to address its weak student-achievement  and Academic Performance Index numbers. Prior to 2005,  Hikido says that Valley High had never met AYP. After working  with the assessment data and receiving coaching in the  various subject areas, the school is now reaching those targets.
One Size Doesn’t Fit All
School officials are accountable for every school within the  boundaries of the district; all must succeed. But a one-sizefits-  all strategy doesn’t apply when a district has a diverse  mix of schools, each with unique needs. So how do districts  work toward the adoption of a uniform strategy that serves  individual student needs?
Some use customized assessment applications provided by  big ed tech companies, while others leverage homegrown systems  that derive key data from student information systems.
Minneapolis Public Schools is one district that uses a customized  assessment solution. MPS works with the Northwest  Evaluation Association, a national nonprofit  organization dedicated to helping all children learn. The  NEA provides research-based educational growth measures,  professional training, and consulting services to improve  teaching and learning. The two groups have collaborated over  the past 10 years on the Northwest Achievement Levels Test  to measure yearly growth in reading and mathematics.
   
          READING AID: Orchard’s Skill Trees 
          target more than 3,000 key skills.
MPS emphasizes drilling down to details to find out how  strong a footing a student has in a given subject. “We work  with the NEA to measure students’ strengths and weaknesses,”  says David Heistad, the district’s executive director of  research, evaluation, and assessment. “We gather and upload  information so teachers can check student progress. This also  allows teachers to drill down to see specific skills within, say,  geometry that the student has yet to master. It gives us a diagnostic  tool that we can use at the beginning of the year to  understand what to concentrate on, and then it shows steady  progress throughout the year.”
Teams of teachers also gather to discuss individual student  progress. They examine behavioral and academic problems  and brainstorm solutions.
Attempted remedies are logged on a website, allowing the  teachers to track what does and doesn’t work. By analyzing  and tracking this information, the district can pinpoint where a student is struggling and prevent unnecessary, inappropriate  referrals to special education.
The district’s professional development efforts extend into the  summer, when it hosts learning institutes that focus on one subject  at a time. During the sessions, teachers are split into small  groups and discuss methods of differentiating instruction. They  share ways to boost achievement, such as increasing student  response times to teacher questions and performing frequent  assessments to ensure that kids aren’t falling through the cracks.
“Some kids need extra practice, and we don’t want to accelerate  instruction beyond their means,” says Heistad. “We also  want to assess the situation to make sure we’re not teaching at  remedial levels and [preventing] students from having the  opportunity to excel.”
To provide observable examples of effective teaching, MPS  began videotaping classroom instruction to demonstrate best  practices that led to improved test scores. The district links  these videos to its website, and teachers can log on to review  activities and apply the same techniques in their classrooms.  For example, if kindergarten language skills  scores are low, the site would provide a link to  a video showing rhyming activities and how to  execute them in the classroom. “We’re trying to  be proactive and help teachers try successful  strategies,” explains Heistad.
The district’s assessment methods appear to  be working. MPS has experienced significant  improvement in meeting AYP in the last couple  of years. “Initially, we had 62 percent of our  schools not making AYP,” says Heistad. “Now,  two years later, we are down to 29 percent,  although we do have a number of schools one  year off of not making AYP—and you have to  be two years off the failing list for the federal  government to forget past history.”
A ‘Different Breed of Students’
Rita Phillips, the ed tech coordinator for the  Sacramento City Unified School District  (CA), says it’s common for some schools to  struggle with meeting AYP while others in the  same district succeed. Figuring out the reasons why one school  is failing while the other thrives is not as urgent as attending to  the school that’s having problems. “It’s often very difficult to  pinpoint the differences,” Phillips says, “but when a school  fails to meet AYP, we start doing interventions.”
The district houses California Standardized Testing and  Reporting (STAR) information in a home-built database that  allows principals and teachers to sort data by class, test scores,  subjects, and areas of deficiency. Sacramento City is fully networked,  with the database stored on a central server. Principals  and teachers can log in to the database at any time from any  computer to examine results for an entire class or one student.
Another of the district’s strategies invites parental involvement.  Principals, teachers, and parents meet to discuss a student’s  subpar test scores and examine potentially helpful  changes to the curriculum and the child’s individual program.“We look at the whole picture with the parents and decidewhat will help students improve,” Phillips says.
Phillips believes multimedia applications must also play a  role in instruction, to engage what she considers to be a “different  breed of students. If it’s not video- or audio-oriented, it  just doesn’t catch their attention. These kids are raised using  cell phones, iPods, and computers. It has changed how they  learn. So we’re trying to hit all different kinds of learning  modalities—even if it’s as simple as teachers using a microphone  in class to amplify their voices.”
At the elementary level, the district focuses on reading software.  Teachers use Orchard, a program from the Siboney LearningGroup that covers morethan 3,000 essential skills which are aligned with most state andnational standardized tests. The software includes more than 150“Skill Trees” designed to build and reinforce key skills that aretaught in the classroom.
“We take the Open Court vocabulary and put it into the  Orchard program,” says Phillips. “If test results show a child  is struggling with reading, and the teacher isn’t effectively getting  the information across, we put the child on the computerand focus on the [problematic] portion.”
Phillips, however, ends with a caveat. He says that analyzing  test scores and coming up with creative curriculum will  not increase student performance unless the student has a  desire to learn. “We reinforce promoting that desire,” she says.“Nothing will work if the student doesn’t believe in himselfand knows he can do whatever he wants to do.”
::webextra:: For more on this topic, visit www.thejournal.com. In theBrowse by Topic menu, click on Accountability/Assessment.
Michelle Gamble-Risley is a freelance writer who specializes in education, government, and technology.