Researchers: Forget Internet Abstinence; Teens Need some Online Risk
        
        
        
        If adults want to help teenagers learn how to handle the big  risks of Internet usage, the best thing they can do is to let them get used to  handling smaller risks situations. That's the conclusion from a Pennsylvania State University research project  that examined adolescent online safety. This approach includes an important  role for teachers as "trusted confidantes" and "educated  advisors."
In the study, researchers worked with teens who spent two  months reflecting on their weekly online experiences. The teens were asked to  keep an online diary to report on four broad types of online risks:
    - Information breaches, in which personal  information or photos were shared or used online without teens' permission or were  shared by the teen and later regretted;
 
    - Online harassment, including cyberbullying and  other online interactions that made the recipients feel threatened, embarrassed  or unsafe;
 
    - Sexual solicitations, including  "sexting" or any requests received by a stranger, acquaintance or  friend that was sexual in nature; and
 
    - Exposure to explicit content, including  voluntary or accidental viewing of pornographic or extremely violent or other  disturbing material.
 
When teens reported one of the risk types in their diaries,  they were given five follow-up questions to answer:
    - What happened?
 
    - Did you intend for this event to happen?
 
    - How did it make you feel?
 
    - What actions did you take when this happened,  and did those actions help?
 
    - Do you feel like this was resolved? If so, how?
 
Because the teens were minors, the researchers obtained  parental consent, and the parents were also asked to report their own  perceptions of risks experienced by their teens each week. There was no  requirement that parents and teens discuss their respective diary entries with  each other. Both groups were notified that if an imminent risk or a situation  of potential child abuse arose, the researchers would report that to  appropriate authorities. That ended up not being necessary for the most part,  because parents or other authorities were already aware of the high-risk  situations.
The results, "Dear  Diary: Teens Reflect on Their Weekly Online Risk Experiences," were  published by the Association for Computing  Machinery and presented at the organization's recent Conference on Human Factors in Computing  Systems.
The respondents in the project were "incentivized"  to participate with gift cards to Amazon and Walmart. Nearly three-quarters (74  percent) were recruited from Pennsylvania; however, people from 12 other states  also participated.
Of those 95 parent-teen pairs who initially registered for  the study, 68 did enough of the diary reporting to be included in the analysis.  Among those teens, 82 percent reported at least one "risk event." On  average they reported about three risk events during the study; the range was  from zero to 15. The most common type — reported by 74 percent of participants —  was exposure to explicit content, which in two-thirds of the incidents occurred  accidentally. Fifteen percent reported online harassment, 24 percent  information breaches and 28 percent at least one sexual solicitation.
The most troublesome incident involved a 14-year-old girl  who had sent a boy a naked picture of herself at his request; he shared it with  others at her school; as a result she was harassed online and expressed  suicidal thoughts, according to the researchers. In that instance the  researchers immediately notified the parent.
The teen participants seemed to cope with their online  problems fairly well by ignoring the content (40 percent of the time) or  leaving the site, confronting the offender or fixing it themselves (47  percent). They were most likely to communicate with someone else regarding an  online harassment incident and least likely to communicate about exposure to  explicit content. For online harassment, specifically, 77 percent of the  reports said that teens told their mothers, 11 percent told their best friends,  and 11 percent reported it to the social media website. Nearly half of the reports  (49 percent) were considered resolved by the time the teen recorded their diary  entries; 17 percent were considered "so insignificant" to the teens  that they felt no resolution was required.
Although the researchers said they were concerned about how  teens "appeared to be desensitized to their online risk experiences,"  they also noted that it was "good" that their participants also  didn't seem to be "adversely affected" and, in fact, showed  resilience in dealing with problems as a matter of routine.
The amount of information teens share online was also a  point of discussion for the project. While studies about online safety for  young people often focus on prevention — stopping them from sharing or  curtailing their online activities — this research suggested that a better  approach would be to allow them to experience the misery of making mistakes and  learning from those blunders (such as when they post photos they later regret  because of subsequent negative reactions from friends).
"Our stance is that teens will inevitably be exposed to  some level of online risk; thus, they need to learn how to deal with it before  the risk becomes too great," the researchers wrote in their paper, "Resilience  theory suggests that lower level risk experiences may actually help inoculate  teens from higher risk situations by teaching them to avoid or cope with future  risk experiences."
So where does that leave educators? Primary author Pamela  Wisniewski, formerly a post-doctoral scholar in information sciences and  technology at Penn State and now an assistant professor in computer science at  the University of Central Florida, suggested  that they can play a role in helping build teen resilience in two ways: by  being a trusted confidant when a teen is experiencing problems and by being an  informed and educated advisor.
"Often, as adults, we tend to overreact to some online  situations since we didn't have the same experiences the current-day teens have  online," Wisniewski told Campus Technology. "By overreacting to less  serious situations, this closes the door on us being considered trustworthy  when teens face even more serious online threats."
Teens frequently dismiss the notion of asking adults how to  deal with the problems they're having online because we often come across as  clueless, she noted. "Sometimes this is due to lack of technology savvy,  and others relevant to the culture and realities of modern youth. So, it is  important for us to stay on top of the latest social media trends, understand complex  topics like online privacy settings and terms of service. That way, when a teen  has a question, we can be a resource for helping them solve the issues that  they face."
In the event that teens are getting unwanted solicitations,  Wisniewski advised, just telling them to say no probably won't work. Better,  she suggested to "coach teens on less combative ways to avoid unwanted  peer pressure. For example, if a teen girl is asked for a naked picture of  herself from a boy, it would be OK to tell her that she can blame technology  and say that her parents have installed monitoring software on her phone so  that she can't send the photo without getting caught." Or teachers can arm  them with information about the laws related to the distribution of porn of a  minor and the possibility of being registered as a sex offender for life if  either person is caught.
"Teens have a strong sense of cost vs. reward, so if we  can educate them more clearly on the costs associated with their actions, they  may make better decisions on their own," Wisniewski said. She added that  educators also have to take their roles as "mandated reporters"  seriously. "Therefore, if we think it is a situation where we will have to  disclose the situation to the authorities due to imminent risk to the teen, we  need to be as upfront with that as possible."
The complete paper is freely available on the ACM website.
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
            
        
        
                
                    About the Author
                    
                
                    
                    Dian Schaffhauser is a former senior contributing editor for 1105 Media's education publications THE Journal, Campus Technology and Spaces4Learning.