Education Research

Teachers Go Online More in Era of Common Core

It has been nine years since a group of governors and state school chiefs adopted the Common Core State Standards. A new report from RAND Corp. asked the question, have the standards — or their alternative versions in some states — changed what American teachers "think and do"?

To find their answer, researchers turned to data from surveys of the American Teacher Panel between 2015 and 2017, examining changes in use of instructional materials and knowledge of the standards and standards-aligned practices among math and English language arts teachers. The panel was designed to capture teachers' ideas about major education policies and programs, as well as how their work changes in response to those policies. During the years covered in this project, roughly 1,700 teachers were specifically surveyed about their understanding of standards and teaching practices in relation to them. (Some results in this report covered only 2016 and 2017 results because of changes made in the survey questions after the first year it was given.)

Math teachers using online material at least two to three times each week in 2015 vs. use at least once a week in 2017. (The 2015 survey didn't include the option of stating "once a week or more," thus, the awkward comparison.) Source: "Changes in What Teachers Know and Do in the Common Core Era," RAND Corp.

Math teachers using online material at least two to three times each week in 2015 vs. use at least once a week in 2017. (The 2015 survey didn't include the option of stating "once a week or more," thus, the awkward comparison.) Source: "Changes in What Teachers Know and Do in the Common Core Era," RAND Corp.

The primary aspects of the standards discussed in the survey were these:

  • Use of complex texts written at or above the students' grade level;
  • Text-focused instruction;
  • Math topics addressed at each grade level;
  • Balanced focus on three aspects of rigor in math proficiency: student conceptual understanding, their procedural skill and fluency and their ability to apply knowledge to real-world problems; and
  • Standards for math practice, such as making sense of problems, constructing viable arguments and critiquing the reasoning of others.
ELA teachers using online material at least two to three times each week in 2015 vs. use at least once a week in 2017. (The 2015 survey didn't include the option of stating "once a week or more," thus, the awkward comparison.) Source: "Changes in What Teachers Know and Do in the Common Core Era," RAND Corp.

ELA teachers using online material at least two to three times each week in 2015 vs. use at least once a week in 2017. (The 2015 survey didn't include the option of stating "once a week or more," thus, the awkward comparison.) Source: "Changes in What Teachers Know and Do in the Common Core Era," RAND Corp.

The report offered four key findings. Overall, teachers didn't appear to be using many published textbooks aligned with newer standards, even though the Common Core "has raised the bar for what students should know and do." However, the use of online materials that were standards-aligned and content-focused "appeared to rise." Specifically, TeachersPayTeachers.com and Pinterest.com topped the source list for online materials. More than half of all math and ELA teachers reported using Teacherspayteachers.com and between a third and a half of math and ELA teachers said they used Pinterest.com.

ELA teachers were less inclined to believe the use of complex, grade-level texts was aligned with their standards in 2017 than in 2016, even though their understanding of their state standards hadn't changed.

As with the ELA teachers, math teachers' overall understanding of the standards didn't change. However, the project did detect a bit of difference among teachers working with "more vulnerable students" and those teaching "low-vulnerability" students"; the second group reported that their students engaged less in some standards-aligned student practices in 2017 than in 2016, though why that might be was unclear to the researchers. One possibility, the report suggested, was that as teachers' awareness of those practices grows, they engage in them "to a lesser extent over time."

Similarly, ELA teachers overall reported that their students engaged less in several standards-aligned practices in 2017 than in 2016.

The report offered a few recommendations for practitioners as well as policymakers:

  • Go online with standards-aligned materials, since that's where teachers "are increasingly turning";
  • Make sure that "high-quality, standards-aligned content" is made available to teachers who serve vulnerable students;
  • Provide more professional development opportunities for teachers to help them learn how to engage students with grade-level texts and support reading approaches that are aligned with their standards; likewise, support teachers to engage students in text-focused practices; and
  • Continue to support teachers' standards-aligned mathematics instruction.

Last, RAND pushed for more research to continue monitoring how teachers' instruction "is changing over time" and in response to the Common Core standards. "High-quality implementation of such ambitious standards as the Common Core will likely take many years and require the support of countless stakeholders, including states, districts, schools, teachers, developers of curriculum materials, researchers, and multiple other external partners," the report concluded. "By working together, and by collecting and analyzing data over time, these stakeholders can shape the system that supports high-quality standards implementation."

The full report is openly available on the RAND website.

About the Author

Dian Schaffhauser is a former senior contributing editor for 1105 Media's education publications THE Journal, Campus Technology and Spaces4Learning.

Whitepapers