Research | News

Teachers Spend $1.3 Billion Out of Pocket on Classroom Materials

Total teacher expenditures on classroom supplies and instructional materials reached $3.5 billion in the 2009-2010 school year, including support from parents and PTAs.

Public school teachers in the United States spent more than $1.33 billion out of pocket on school supplies and instructional materials in the 2009-2010 school year, according to new research released by the National School Supply and Equipment Association (NSSEA), a trade association for educational product companies.

The report, "The 2010 NSSEA Retail Market Awareness Study," was based on a survey of 308 K-12 teachers in May 2010 conducted by Perry Research Professionals. It revealed that teachers spent on average $356 of their own money on supplies and resources, including an average of $170 on supplies and $186 on instructional materials. (Instructional materials were defined as software and games, as well as paper-based teaching aids and other non-equipment teaching materials; supplies were defined as printer paper, arts and crafts supplies, pencils, glue, and other similar supplies.)

Despite the total $1.33 billion out of pocket price tag for classroom materials, average individual teacher expenditures were actually down this year compared with previous studies: $395 in a 2007-2008 NSSEA study and $552 in a 2005-2006 NSSEA study.

Why the recent decline?

"Teachers are feeling the pinch just like others affected by the downturn in the economy," Adrienne Watts Dayton, vice president of marketing and communications for NSSEA, told us in an e-mail. "While teachers continue to supplement the resources in the classroom, parents too are asked to contribute to the shortages in school budget."

A full 92 percent of teachers reported spending some amount of their own money on classroom supplies, while a smaller but still significant 85 percent reported spending their own money on instructional materials.

Looking beyond out of pocket expenses, teachers spent a total of $3.5 billion in the 2009-2010 school year, an average of $936 per teacher--$398 on supplies and $538 on instructional materials.

The major source of classroom supply funding aside from the teachers themselves was parents, who spent an average of $19 per student on classroom supplies. NSSEA estimated that amounted to about $475 per teacher based on a 25-student average classroom. The study said that 47 percent of teachers indicated parents are required to buy classroom materials. Other sources of funding included PTA funds and school purchase orders but were not broken out in the report.

NSSEA represents more than 1,400 companies that supply educational products. Further information about the study, which runs $199, can be found on the association's site here.

About the Author

David Nagel is the executive producer for 1105 Media's online K-12 and higher education publications and electronic newsletters. He can be reached at dnagel@1105media.com. He can now be followed on Twitter at http://twitter.com/THEJournalDave (K-12) or http://twitter.com/CampusTechDave (higher education).

Comments

Tue, Oct 25, 2011 Lisa New Jersey

Hello All, I am surprised at what I have been reading here. Our school makes all parents buy all the supplies that our kids need! We also have to send in REAL money for the lower grade kids to use when learning how to count money and sometimes we don't get it back! The school, PTA, teachers, etc. are always asking us for money. As a Room parent last year alone, I spent $300.00 for parties and crafts and also contributed to at the fund raisers, always volunteer to help in the classroom for FREE, and others volunteer to work the cafeteria, playground etc. As parents we are also asked to bring in liquid hand soap, paper towels, hand sanitizers, and cleaning products for the classroom teacher to use. So, I cannot relate to all these comments. We as parents are hit up for all kinds of things, money, volunteering etc. I am not sure why there is such an imbalance in our country.

Sat, Oct 22, 2011 Chamara Sri lanka.

Dear Sirs !!! I'm handling My owns Kinder School. Around 2 years. Now this time Much Moore Students will join that School. that's Why I Couldn't Maintain with my owns. That's Why I need Some Helps From Next Persons Please. Kindly Can You Feed Back To me It's Very big Help For That Children. If You Can Touch Under my Following E-Mail Address. I'm very pleasure to you.......... if You need Much Details I Can Pass to you Also. chamara_peris@yahoo.com Thanking For you ; Chamara.

Sun, Aug 28, 2011 Eric Pac NorthWest

For those of you who are interested, here is an article from the Chicago Sun-Times that confirms Mitch's statement. We all know that Teacher compensation across the country does not reflect what is in this article, but this is an eye-opener. http://www.suntimes.com/news/education/5484550-418/some-illinois-public-school-teachers-earning-six-figure-salaries.html Some highlights: "More than half of all District 113 full-time teachers — 55 percent to be exact — pulled down at least $100,000 in total compensation, including benefits and extra pay for extracurricular activities. Statewide, 11.25 percent of high school teachers and 2.26 percent of elementary-grade teachers hit that mark. Statewide, the average elementary teacher made $61,140 — including all benefits, summer school pay, after-school stipends and retirement payouts. The average high school teacher took home $69,366. As expected, most of the top-paying districts are affluent, serving few low-income kids. But Dolton District 149, with 90 percent low-income students, was the exception. In addition to his base salary, Stafford says he makes about $13,000 extra a year by serving as boys soccer coach and girls assistant soccer coach. After six years at Deerfield High, he is not yet in the $100,000-plus club, but hopes to hit the top of the credential pay schedule this year by completing 60 credit hours beyond a master’s."

Sun, Aug 28, 2011 Dan Madison

It is MUCH more than $300-$400 per year. Believe me, I'm married to a special ed teacher and I see how much extra goes into the work each week. @Mitch - time to come back to reality. And don't drink the "Anti-Intellectual Tea Party Line". Drink the Wisconsin beer!!!

Sun, Aug 28, 2011 Kevin minong wisconsin

I use to help the other students by donating alot of supplies, then they sent a letter to the families saying they need more supplies, i asked what happened? they told me someone stole them, i found out it was a janitor, It sucks because i am not a rich man by no means and i went to help out and this is what happened, I will help out again now that that janitor is not there but still makes a person very leary

Fri, Aug 26, 2011 Jen

So, I just found out today that we will have to buy ALL our own supplies for this year (with the exception of paper) because of a "clerical" error. This means buying folders for student portfolios, pens, pencils, batteries for graphing calculators, dry erase markers, and many other items/supplies. This will not be cheap, and I am fortunate that my husband has a very good job to help support my family, and my career!...otherwise, I and my students would have to go without many of the things we need to get through the year... We work our butts off, only to spend a good-sized chunk of our income on supplies we need for the classroom and for our less-fortunate students. I have many students that would go without notebooks if I did not supply them. Hopefully, articles like this will help raise awareness, and help lower the "vilification" of teachers who are only trying to educate our students and get them ready for the world beyond school!

Fri, Aug 26, 2011 DMCD Colorado

Mitch says "Union teachers" are trying to feather their own nests. News Flash, Mitch: People who are only interested in feathering their own nests don't become teachers, union or non-union. And soon, if we don't start treating teachers better, we will have a great shortage of high-caliber teachers. I loved teaching, but advised my children against it when they were deciding on careers. I have one daughter who didn't listen to me, and became a teacher. Her take-home-pay has gone down each year for the past three years.

Fri, Aug 26, 2011 Blanca

Mitch is either an idiot, a liar or both. If he could find one, JUST ONE, classroom teacher in a public k-12 school in the entire state of Oregon (which is were I teach) who makes $100,000 a year, let alone $200,000, I would give him my entire salary for a month... which is neither $10,000 nor $20,000.

Fri, Aug 26, 2011 Maine

Mitch, please tell me where the $100.000 jobs are. I taught for 36 years, been retired 5, and with a master's degree, made only $57.000. You don't know what you are talking about. I suspect that doesn't bother you. Facts might get in the way of your opinions.

Fri, Aug 26, 2011 Wildcat Kansas

So if we like Fox News, we don't have brain? If we spend our own money on classroom supplies, we should spend more? If I believe that the states should be responsible for their own education standards, what does that make teachers? Oh I know, people that actually know what the heck is going on with education. People that typically criticize teachers and education usually are those that don't have a clue about it...or have kids in public schools.I am paid a salary that is divided by 12 months...anything I do extra beyond my contract is my choice and my choice is that I need to work a 2nd job to make ends meet...or at least come close. Education should not be about politics - it's not a left or right wing career...I am a Republican but vote on issues, not the party line...I like the balance of fox news, I believe that more money needs to go to salaries for teachers and for more professional development. I also believe that the administrations of districts should be built from the ground up...meaning teachers should be making more...administration should be teacher's contract only extended if necessary. We are doing all the work and if you don't want to teach us, or pay us...stop blaming us. Every teacher I know works hard, and has a belief in helping kids - period. No one is in it for the vacation days...give me a break.

Fri, Aug 26, 2011 easterbunny

We really do spend our own money on classroom supplies. A few areas of the country have higher salaries, but I make a tiny bit more than 200% of the poverty level for my family of 4. My own kids almost qualify for free and reduced lunch. The average teacher salary is $40,000 for "full time" teaching (and don't use the 9 months of the year argument -- it's really not true). Do you spend 1% of your salary purchasing items that your employer does not provide? For items that you will not use yourself but give to others? And these stats don't include the charitable donations we give -- buying magazines, cookie dough, giving to the United Way and food pantry and the free time we give to these organizations because setting an example is part of the job. It is true, "Mitch" -- would you like to see my tax returns & receipts?

Fri, Aug 26, 2011 Sgt_Jake Utah

Mitch, your ignorance and extreme bias is showing. The article clearly states the study comes from a trade organization that sells school supplies, not the teachers unions. The study was /posted/ by the union. Your "facts" get increasingly ridiculous until you hit fact 5 (the NEA is the most powerful? Leftist policies? Really?) and you knock it clean out of the park of rational thought. You're listening to way WAY too much fox and right wing talk radio. You've completely lost it - you're repeating sound bites that were ignorant and misinformed when they were uttered, and have incorporated them into your personal dogma. Every negative you stated is cherry picking (ie - the exception, not the rule). Koolaid indeed. It's sad - people like you are the reason this country is failing. Try actually THINKING instead of just absorbing the opinions of others whom you think sound smart. And Mitch, never attribute conspiracy to something which can be explained by stupidity. More on topic - this was "based on a survey of 308 K-12 teachers in May 2010 conducted by Perry Research Professionals.". This was not a scientific study, this was a survey, using a pool so small that there's no way the results have a significance level. At all. Extrapolating a 1.3 billion dollar spend out of pocket from that small of a control group, in the form of a survey, without considering whether or not the teachers are paid back through any number of programs, is irresponsible, biased, and loses credibility out of the gate. Shame on you "The Journal" for publishing (or pushing) such weak 'evidence' and stating it as "fact" in the headline. And you should be aware that pinheads like Mitch will use this headline for years as "evidence" of your "bias", "corruption", and "agenda". Which is sad, because teachers nationally probably spend a lot more than that, and actually, unquestionably, "out of pocket". Tie that with what parents pitch in (I bought a case of kleenex for my kids' classroom last week) and people might get a sense for how bad the eduction system needs money. What's even more galling... I can buy the "research" for $199. Really? I can BUY it so I can see if it's any good? ...Let me ask you something David Nagel... did your office buy it? And did *you* read it? (Or perhaps I mean, understand it?) Because it doesn't sound like it. It sounds like like you're quoting the marketing that wants me to buy it, but hopes that I don't because it's, at it's very best, shaky evidence. It sounds like you believe it's true, and don't think you need to read it just to understand what you already know to be true. It's sounds like you're not doing a very good job. And I'm not buying it. (That, Mitch, is called critical thinking. Try it sometime. If you can pry your little brain open enough to accept that you may be wrong.)

Fri, Aug 26, 2011 drklassen

Wow, Mitch, talk about swigging the Kool-Aid! The data are self-reported, yes---how else would you get it? Since it's out-of-pocket money being spent, there are no records since they aren't turning in receipts to anyone. Private schools NO better than public when you normalize outcomes based on socio-economic level. In fact, they tend to do a little worse. The skew is that they get to pick and choose which students they get to take. Public schools have to take all. The rest is just anti-union screed.

Fri, Aug 26, 2011

Sorry for next post: type is too small and my typing is too poor: CORRECTIONS: "KOOL)AID" = KOOL-AID "band" = and 40 = 4) "100,000 a tear" = $100,000 a Year

Fri, Aug 26, 2011 Pfeiffer Orange County, California

I do not mind spending my own money for classroom resources. I need to take advantage of other resources to help offset my personal cost (like DonorsChoose.org). If the district I work in wasn't afraid of emancipatory education, perhaps I could use YouTube, iTunesU, and their kin... "based on a 25-student average classroom" is laughable. I have an average of 40 students in my schedule and, these statistics presented include "all certificated staff" even if they do not directly serve students in a classroom setting (counselors, librarians, administrators). I wonder how much the leadership on my campus has spent this month preparing their offices for the upcoming year? Thanks for the information and for raising awareness; now what?

Fri, Aug 26, 2011 Mitch

OK PEOPLE DON"T DRINK THE KOOL)AID TOO FAST! Let's try band focus on a few facts before we get all silly. 1) These stats come from the mouths of UNION teachers who are relentlessly trying to feather their own nests. 2) There is no proof what so ever these figures are accurate. 3) Private schools manage to get by on FAR less money on average and yet produce students 1-2 grades ahead of public schools 40 Since many of the teachers in the US are getting WAY over paid I wouldn't mind if they used a couple of grand per yr of their own funds. In IL you can go on line and see a full list of all the teachers betting over 100,000 a tear. Many closer to $200,000. plus GREAT benefits and huge vacations. It's absurd! 5) Let's all try and remember that the NEA is the most powerful union in the US and probably the most powerful organization. They absolutely have more say in the Democratic party than any other organization..almost than ALL other organizations. When Carter was chosen to run, OVER 50% of the delegates who voted were NEA members. Once you have honestly studied the facts you are only gonna feel bad for the teachers who really want to do a good job but can't because of all the leftist policies that are ruining the kids. READ: NEA Trojan Horse in American Education or anyone of many other books the media won't tell you about. Go to Youtube andf look up "Stossel education"

Thu, Aug 25, 2011 Aleina Mumbai

oh.But there are schools which runs over the graveyard. http://goo.gl/b6cQ3

Sun, Nov 7, 2010 Erik Uppman San Francisco, CA

Statistics like these are certainly eye opening to those who don't have family or friends who work in education. After years of spending hundreds of dollars out of pocket for classroom materials, my wife (a teacher) and I realized there must be a better way. Together, we've started SproutClassrooms.com, a small online store where teachers and parents can find slightly used teaching materials for a small fraction of the prices paid at retail. I hope your readers will help us to spread the word.

Mon, Aug 16, 2010 Canadian teacher Ontario, Canada

We have the same situation here in Ontario--even though we pay a crazy amount of taxes and much of those tax dollars goes toward education. I have already spent $1000 for my classroom for September. Ridiculous! But we do it for our students. We are forced (in a way) to pay out of pocket because our classrooms cannot be bare! But it's time we are reimbursed for it.

Thu, Jul 29, 2010 Washington State

I completely know what this is like. I have spent hundreds of dollars on everything from pencils, to educational videos, even a DVD player when the district didn't provide one. And this doesn't count the amount of unpaid time I have spent chaperoning after school activities and dances. It's ridiculous to expect teachers to continue to fund their classrooms at this level. I would like to stop; however, there just is no other way to get all of the supplies I need or want.

Thu, Jul 22, 2010 tc

I was talking to a kindergarden teacher in our district today. She just spent $800.00 on books for her classroom! Additionally, our utility company has challenged their property tax assesment, so our district is losing $1 million plus in revenue this year. Our district was rated Excellent, but how can this be maintained with resources being cut on a yearly basis?

Mon, Jul 19, 2010 Cara http://www.k12schoolsupplies.net

As a teacher, I can identify with spending extra money on classroom supplies. I am taking time off to be with my kids and I have a basement full of classroom supplies that are not being used. I have thought about selling them; however, I feel that it was such a huge investment.

Tue, Jul 13, 2010 Editor

Dan's link has been verified as a valid URL. It's a short TV news story about retired teachers donating school supplies. --David Nagel

Tue, Jul 13, 2010 Dan Fulton Alabama

See: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZ6iNp2NT0M

Tue, Jul 13, 2010 James Hayes-Bohanan Bridgewater, MA

Thank you for getting the word out. As budgets shrink, teachers are often scapegoated (while many the Wall Street types who brought down the economy remain unscathed). It is important to remember that people do not teach for the money or even the schedule; they teach because they want to make a difference. The out-of-pocket expenses, in fact, are a small part of the financial sacrifice. Many teachers could earn far more money doing something else, but choose not to.

Add your Comment

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above

White Papers:

  • Desktop Virtualization in K-12 Schools: Reducing Costs, Saving Time And Delivering Anytime, Anywhere Access for Students and Staff PDF screen shot

    This paper will show how desktop virtualization can positively position educational institutions for the future, enabling them to reduce expenses through hard dollar savings and time efficiencies while delivering the experience that students, faculty and staff need and desire. Through the experiences of Babylon School District, as well as Manchester Essex Regional School District in Massachusetts and Rockford Public Schools in Michigan, we’ll paint a picture of how desktop virtualization can revolutionize education’s approach to delivering technology — an approach schools can actually afford. Read more...