Networking | News

Moving to 802.11n: Colorado District Beefs Up WiFi

St. Vrain Valley School District (SVVSD) of Longmont, CO has opted to replace its current network of access points in an effort to provide more reliable, efficient, and consistent WiFi performance throughout its 49 school campuses.

"A robust WiFi network is the life-blood of a 21st century education. Schools today must offer and empower anytime, anyplace, any pace, and any device learning opportunities," said Joe McBreen, chief information officer for SVVSD.

For SVVSD, which serves 27,000 students over 411 square miles, the exponential growth in mobile devices in recent years was an important factor in its decision to upgrade. The district has chosen the ZoneFlex system manufactured by Ruckus, and it will install 802.11n dual-band 7962 access points (APs) at each school facility. All of the APs connect to a WAN originating at the district's main office building and are all managed remotely using the Ruckus FlexMaster system management software.

The company noted that school environments today have to rely on WiFi for a wide range of technology beyond computer stations, including laptops, smart phones, iPads and iPods, VoIP communications, wireless video surveillance, and presentation technology such as projectors. In order to provide performance and service at speeds and consistency levels that users of such technology have come to expect, schools and other high-density facilities must upgrade from conventional WiFi to smarter, more flexible systems capable of adapting transmissions for heavy interference and devices that are constantly on the move, as well as those that are stationary.

SVVSD's McBreen identified both population and modern building construction as key factors affecting WiFi reliability. "Even newer buildings use a variety of materials in the walls, which can be hard for WiFi signals to penetrate. In one of our tests, we piled 78 802.11b, g and n devices onto a single Ruckus 7962 access point, and put it through its paces. We simply couldn't make it fail in typical K-12 scenarios, including dense numbers of devices consuming video, file share access, and shared Google Document collaboration."

SVVSD is one of more than 500 educational institutions around the world, including K-12, colleges and universities, and alternative schools, that have installed Ruckus ZoneFlex systems since the start of 2010, according to the company.

About the Author

Scott Aronowitz is a freelance writer based in Las Vegas. He has covered the technology, advertising, and entertainment sectors for seven years. He can be reached here.

Comments

Mon, Oct 11, 2010 John Michigan

Oh good Lord - there are no studies or instances anyplace that prove RF energy is doing any such damage. As a Ham Radio operator for many decades, I am well aware of the dangers of high power RF fields.If you were to touch a transmission antenna with several hundred watts being sent through it, sure you'll get an RF burn. But, why would you touch it? The ERP of these wireless devices in the WIFI spectrum are so low that there is NO chance of anything you describe, happening. Cell phones included. Stop spreading paranoia!!

Fri, Sep 24, 2010 dm

More information about the biological effects of non-ionizing radiation from wireless technology is coming out every day. Enough is not being done by cities, counties, states and the Federal Government to protect us from the potentially devastating health and environmental effects. Through the 1996 telecommunications act the telecoms are shielded from liability and oversight. Initially cell phones were released with no pre-market safety testing despite the fact the Government and the Military have known for over 50 years that radio frequency is harmful to all biological systems (inthesenewtimes dot com/2009/05/02/6458/.). Health studies were suppressed and the 4 trillion dollar a year industry was given what amounts to a license to kill.
On it's face, the 1996 telecommunications act is unconstitutional and a cover-up. Within the fine print city governments are not allowed to consider "environmental" effects from cell towers. They should anyway! It is the moral and legal obligation of our government to protect our health and welfare? Or is it? When did this become an obsolete concept? A cell tower is a microwave weapon capable of causing cancer, genetic damage & other biological problems. Bees, bats, humans, plants and trees are all affected by RF & EMF. Communities fight to keep cell towers away from schools yet they allow the school boards to install wi fi in all of our schools thereby irradiating our kids for 6-7 hours each day. Kids go home and the genetic assault continues with DECT portable phones, cell phones, wi fi and Wii's. A tsunami of cancers and early alzheimer's await our kids. Young people under the age of 20 are 420% more at risk of forming brain tumors (Swedish study, Dr. Lennart Hardell) because of their soft skulls, brain size and cell turn over time. Instead of teaching "safer" cell phone use and the dangers of wireless technology our schools mindlessly rush to wireless bending to industry pressure rather than informed decision making. We teach about alcohol, tobacco, drugs and safe sex but not about "safer" cell phone use. We are in a wireless trance, scientists are panicking while young brains, ovaries and sperm burns.

Add your Comment

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above

White Papers:

  • Dallas County School District Overcomes Coverage Gaps with MOTOTRBO Digital Radios PDF screen shot

    Dallas County School District needed to quickly resolve their radio coverage gaps throughout the county for more efficient transportation communication and to ensure student safety. Download this whitepaper to see how this district has found their solution with improved coverage area, clear audio and private communications, in addition to improved efficiency and student safety. Read more...