Mobile Computing | News

Report: PreK-12 Mobile Learning Hindered but Growing

Overall growth in handheld learning technologies is forecast at 18.3 percent annually through 2014.

Mobile learning in preK-12 is growing at a double-digit rate, but according to new data released by market research firm Ambient Insight, several factors are hindering it from even more rapid adoption, including "saturation" of older forms of technology in American schools.

Excluding mobile computers (laptops, netbooks, tablets), the market for mobile learning technologies in the United States was $632.2 in 2009 across all sectors. That gave the United States the lead in mobile educational technology adoption for the first time, surpassing Japan, South Korea, and the UK, according to the new report, "The US Market for Mobile Learning Products and Services: 2009-2014 Forecast and Analysis." And that figure will grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 18.3 percent until it reaches $1.46 billion in 2014.

In overall mobile learning market size, academic institutions are lagging behind healthcare and behind private consumers, who are the most rapid adopters, particularly during economic downturns.

"The current US Mobile Learning market is being driven by consumers and healthcare buyers, who increased spending on mobile learning even at the height of the recession," the report indicated. "Consumers always gravitate to education and training during recessions. There is currently a boom in demand for secondary, career, and vocational education in the US. It is not surprising that a great deal of the Mobile Learning content across the app stores pertains to topics taught in secondary institutions."

By 2014, preK-12 institutions will account for slightly more than 10.2 percent of the overall market for mobile learning in this country--again, excluding laptops and netbooks. Expenditures are projected to grow at a five-year CAGR of 15.1 percent from its 2009 level of about $70.9 million, reaching $143.3 million in 2014.

That means that while significant growth is happening in elementary and secondary institutions, it's happening at a slower rate than the overall mobile learning market.

Why?

According to Ambient Insight, although schools were early adopters of mobile technologies and continue to show interest in their potential for teaching and learning, there are at least three significant factors slowing things down.

The first, which Ambient Insight described as a short-term issue, is the "growing practice of banning mobile phones and personal media devices in classrooms," the report said. "Essentially, schools still prefer to provide the Mobile Learning devices to students. The backlash against self-owned connected devices has created a demand for bundled products and device-embedded Learning."

Further, schools are also fixated on purchasing from a somewhat closed circle of vendors. "[PreK-12] prefers products designed by educational specialists for academic institutions. Even Nintendo and Sony have had difficulty breaking into this market," the report said.

But the most significant factor cited by Ambient Insight is the saturation level of non-handheld devices. Every single school in the United States has at least one computer with Internet access, and there's an average of one Internet-connected computer for every three students. This technology saturation "makes it difficult to justify buying mobile devices," Ambient Insight said. The report cited data from the United States Department of Education that indicated "only 15% of public schools were providing smartphones to teachers and only 4% provided them to students with one device per 21 students."

One factor that could cause some disruption, however, is Apple with its iOS devices.

Sam S. Adkins, Ambient Insight's chief research officer, told us that while it's too soon to say what kind of impact the devices will have, "iOS is a major factor in Mobile Learning in general. Of course, iOS devices are the iPod touch, iPhone, and iPad and do not include the lower-end iPods. There are a still a vast amount of lower-end iPods in the schools, and short of PDFs and podcasts, don't come near the capabilities of the iOS devices."

According to the report, at present, "Even though 13% of all schools distribute [personal media players] and iPods, the ratio of devices per student is 1 to 69." And consumers are the major purchasers driving preK-12 content adoption for these devices, not academic institutions.

Ambient Insight's "The US Market for Mobile Learning Products and Services: 2009-2014 Forecast and Analysis" is available now. Further information, including an executive summary, can be found here.

Comments

Fri, Sep 10, 2010 Editor

To the anonymous poster: Your comment is unexpected. I'd be curious to hear more. Not trying to be argumentative or to dismiss your views on this (because you're obviously in the trenches, and I'm not), but I don't think it's out of line to to point out some things that I and some others take for granted that you might not: that the devices themselves are often paid for by the student's family (assuming we're talking about things like phones and iPods); that the security presumably already exists (i.e., you don't leave your wireless network wide open for any passerby with a mobile phone to access); and that, when it comes to mobile phones, students are self-supporting and, in fact, could probably provide better support to your staff than your staff could provide to them. So those are some of the things I take a as a given. Obviously there would be some costs for the school if the devices were used as part of the curriculum (as opposed to, say, merely allowing kids to access their iPhones to use the free scientific calculator app rather than having them go out and spend $30 at Target for a halfway decent calculator). But I'd like to hear where you're coming from on this about what those costs would be. --David Nagel

Fri, Sep 10, 2010

Another significant factor that's glossed over or skipped entirely in this article is the budget. One might infer from the tone of this article and the research presented that schools are merely recalcitrant in providing technology. I'd wager that the costs involved in equipment, infrastructure, support, security, and replenishment are more significant than just a case of "we don't wanna."

Wed, Sep 1, 2010 Alexis Peterka Portland, OR

I recently attended a panel discussion on this very topic. Two of the panelists were kind enough to post their slides and presentation material here: http://mobileportland.com/node/43 Most interesting to me was the work of Joe Morelock, Director of Technology and Innovation for the Canby School District. He started a pilot program a while back to have iPod Touches in 3rd grade classrooms, with teacher-chosen apps. The program has been such a success (student performance on the Oregon Assessment of Knowledge and Skills has improved markedly in classes using the devices), they've expanded it to include almost 1,700 iPod devices in the district in this coming school year. - Alexis Peterka http://www.benchmarkgrading.com

Tue, Aug 31, 2010

In the K-12 arena content-filtering is critical for reasons just noted in previous comment. Filtering content to staff can be equally as challenging. Mobile learning has its benefits however might it be best controlled from the home perspective as students use their devices as a supplement to learning not the primary device for knowledge acquisition?

Tue, Aug 31, 2010

It's not that hard to set up content filtering for user-provided devices - as soon as anyone connects to our wi-fi, they are subject to our filter. The problem comes with students who are connecting via their own 3G or 4G connections - I don't know of a way to filter that and it's a problem. An even bigger problem is the continued Mac vs PC wars (and now we can add Android to the mix) - I know of at least one Tech Director of a school district in my state that refuses to allow Apple products of any type in his district. Sorry - all schools should be mixed-use and the content and student need should be king.

Tue, Aug 31, 2010

One thing i think everyone forgets.....most students are under 18...laws say under age children have to be protected/filtered from "adult" information/chats/etc. If there was no law saying schools are not liable for filtering material, then mobile learning would be boundless. They are not college kids.

Add your Comment

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above

White Papers:

  • Desktop Virtualization in K-12 Schools: Reducing Costs, Saving Time And Delivering Anytime, Anywhere Access for Students and Staff PDF screen shot

    This paper will show how desktop virtualization can positively position educational institutions for the future, enabling them to reduce expenses through hard dollar savings and time efficiencies while delivering the experience that students, faculty and staff need and desire. Through the experiences of Babylon School District, as well as Manchester Essex Regional School District in Massachusetts and Rockford Public Schools in Michigan, we’ll paint a picture of how desktop virtualization can revolutionize education’s approach to delivering technology — an approach schools can actually afford. Read more...