Robotic Infant Simulators Actually Promote Teen Pregnancy, Study Finds

Robotic infant simulators — or robot babies — used by schools to help prevent teen pregnancy actually have the opposite effect, according to a study published in the British health journal The Lancet.

Australian researchers randomly assigned nearly 3,000 teenage girls to one of two groups. Some received an automated doll (programmed to cry, sleep, eat and spoil its diapers on a realistic schedule, with sensors to track whether students are properly caring for it), while others received only standard health education. The researchers tracked the girls until they turned 20, using records from hospital and abortion clinics.

The results were surprising: 8 percent of the girls who received an infant simulator ended up giving birth, compared to just 4 percent of those who received standard health education. And 9 percent of the girls who received a robot baby had an abortion, compared to 6 percent who received standard health education.

“The infant simulator-based VIP program did not achieve its aim of reducing teenage pregnancy,” the researchers determined. “Girls in the intervention group were more likely to experience a birth or an induced abortion than those in the control group before they reached 20 years of age.”

Wisconsin-based Realityworks is the largest provider of infant simulators to schools in the United States and abroad. The company estimates it controls 95 percent of the infant-simulator market.

Shortly after the Lancet study was released, the company issued a statement calling The Lancet study “deeply flawed” and criticizing the researchers’ findings as “junk science” — despite their rigorous methodology. The company complained that the Australian schools in the study did not use the full Realityworks curriculum.

“The study had nothing to do with us, our curriculum or our RealCare Baby infant simulators, nor are its conclusions about us credible,” the company said in its statement.

A Bloomberg Businessweek investigation late last year found that two-thirds of U.S. school districts buy some kind of infant simulator, and that the Realityworks model (which costs about $650 apiece) had become “a staple of American education, reaching more than 6 million students at 17,000 schools.”

In addition to robot babies, Realityworks now produces many other “experiential learning technologies,” including a growing number of simulators for career and technical education programs, including nursing, welding and animal science, Education Week reported last week.

About the Author

Richard Chang is associate editor of THE Journal. He can be reached at [email protected].

Featured

  • AI toolbox containing a wrench, document icon, gears, and a network symbol

    Common Sense Media Releases Free AI Toolkit, AI Readiness & Implementation Guides

    Common Sense Media has developed an AI Toolkit for School Districts, available to educators free of charge, that provides guidelines and resources for implementing AI in education.

  • elementary school building with children outside, overlaid by a glowing data network and transparent graphs

    Toward a Holistic Approach to Data-Informed Decision-Making in Education

    With increasing access to data and powerful analytic tools, the temptation to reduce educational outcomes to mere numbers is strong. However, educational leadership demands a more holistic and thoughtful approach.

  • three silhouetted education technology leaders with thought bubbles containing AI-related icons

    Ed Tech Leaders Rank Generative AI as Top Tech Priority

    In a recent CoSN survey, an overwhelming majority of ed tech leaders (94%) said they see AI as having a positive impact on education. Respondents ranked generative AI as their top tech priority, with 80% reporting their districts have gen AI initiatives underway, or plan to in the current school year.

  • AI-powered individual working calmly on one side and a burnt-out person slumped over a laptop on the other

    AI's Productivity Gains Come at a Cost

    A recent academic study found that as companies adopt AI tools, they're not just streamlining workflows — they're piling on new demands. Researchers determined that "AI technostress" is driving burnout and disrupting personal lives, even as organizations hail productivity gains.