Report: Enterprises Are Embracing Agentic AI

According to new research released by SnapLogic, enterprises are increasingly deploying AI agents: autonomous, persistent systems that don't just answer questions but act.

The research, conducted in partnership with 3GEM and based on responses from 1,000 IT decision-makers in the U.S., U.K., Germany, and Australia, found that 50% of enterprises are already deploying AI agents, and another 32% plan to do so within the next 12 months. This isn't a pilot wave — it's a platform shift.

Unlike AI assistants that require constant human steering, AI agents operate with purpose: take a task, understand context, make decisions, and execute workflows — no hand-holding required. They're multi-modal, stateful, and often API-native. They're also reshaping how ops teams think about automation, especially across sprawling cloud infrastructure.

Killing the Manual Slack Ticket, One Endpoint at a Time

IT was named the top beneficiary of agentic automation in the SnapLogic report — 80% of respondents said their IT organizations will see the biggest ROI. And for good reason: IT teams today spend 16 hours per week managing and fixing AI tools. With agent-based automation, respondents expect to reclaim 19 hours weekly. That's a full sprint per month, per engineer, clawed back from toil.

Other departments are next. Data, security, R&D, and even finance are increasingly reliant on manual, high-frequency ops. AI agents — especially when paired with infrastructure-as-code, APIs, and observability layers — are well-positioned to take the wheel.

Why LLMs Alone Won't Cut It

The big unlock isn't just generative text. It's persistent logic with task execution built in.

Where LLMs excel at language and summarization, AI agents combine reasoning with memory, orchestration, and environment awareness. They don't just say, "Here's how you might reset your password." They actually reset it based on user policy, security posture, and real-time system state.

This makes them ideal for resolving the long tail of issues that used to clog IT queues, cost human hours, and never quite justified custom automation.

$$$, At Scale

According to the report, enterprise adoption isn't speculative; it's budgeted.

The average company surveyed plans to invest over $2.5 million in AI agents this year alone. A staggering 10% are spending more than $5 million. Australia is outpacing everyone, with companies there averaging over $3.15 million in planned spend.

And they're not spending it all on proof-of-concepts, the researchers found. Enterprises today run an average of 32 AI agents in production. They plan to deploy 30 more over the next year.

That's 60 agents per org — automating, orchestrating, optimizing. Think automated incident responders, FinOps cost monitors, self-healing infra agents, user access managers. Think low-latency, high-consequence task execution that scales beyond cron jobs and shell scripts.

What's Blocking the Bots

Of course, real-world friction remains. Security and privacy are the number one concern, cited by 60% of respondents. AI hallucinations still scare 14% of orgs. And legacy infrastructure is a recurring bottleneck, especially when agents need access to internal systems that weren't built with API extensibility in mind.

Also: Not everyone understands what an agent is. Nearly a third of respondents reported lack of internal knowledge as a deployment blocker.

Bridging this knowledge gap is where AI Centers of Excellence (CoEs) come in — small teams focused on governance, risk mitigation, and cross-team integration. It's also why companies are starting with narrow, high-impact use cases (like IT workflows) before moving into riskier or more customer-facing domains.

Agentic OS: Coming Soon to an Org Near You

The key insight from SnapLogic's report isn't just that AI agents work. It's that enterprise teams trust them. In fact, 84% said they'd trust an agent just as much, if not more, than a human to complete certain tasks.

That's not to say humans are getting replaced. But the composition of teams is changing. Agents don't need sleep, don't forget context, and don't skip documentation. They're being plugged into pipelines, CLIs, CI/CD systems, and ticketing queues — wherever repeatable work lives.

For the full report, visit the SnapLogic site (registration required).

About the Author

John K. Waters is the editor in chief of a number of Converge360.com sites, with a focus on high-end development, AI and future tech. He's been writing about cutting-edge technologies and culture of Silicon Valley for more than two decades, and he's written more than a dozen books. He also co-scripted the documentary film Silicon Valley: A 100 Year Renaissance, which aired on PBS.  He can be reached at [email protected].

Featured

  • AI toolbox containing a wrench, document icon, gears, and a network symbol

    Common Sense Media Releases Free AI Toolkit, AI Readiness & Implementation Guides

    Common Sense Media has developed an AI Toolkit for School Districts, available to educators free of charge, that provides guidelines and resources for implementing AI in education.

  • elementary school building with children outside, overlaid by a glowing data network and transparent graphs

    Toward a Holistic Approach to Data-Informed Decision-Making in Education

    With increasing access to data and powerful analytic tools, the temptation to reduce educational outcomes to mere numbers is strong. However, educational leadership demands a more holistic and thoughtful approach.

  • three silhouetted education technology leaders with thought bubbles containing AI-related icons

    Ed Tech Leaders Rank Generative AI as Top Tech Priority

    In a recent CoSN survey, an overwhelming majority of ed tech leaders (94%) said they see AI as having a positive impact on education. Respondents ranked generative AI as their top tech priority, with 80% reporting their districts have gen AI initiatives underway, or plan to in the current school year.

  • AI-powered individual working calmly on one side and a burnt-out person slumped over a laptop on the other

    AI's Productivity Gains Come at a Cost

    A recent academic study found that as companies adopt AI tools, they're not just streamlining workflows — they're piling on new demands. Researchers determined that "AI technostress" is driving burnout and disrupting personal lives, even as organizations hail productivity gains.