Separation Anxiety

##AUTHORSPLIT##<---> The annual Speak Up survey returns, with some unsettling data revealing a disconnect between students and their educators.

Geoffrey H. FletcherTWENTY-THREE PERCENT. Twenty-three percent!

That is the number of students-- self-labeled "advanced tech"-- who answered yes to the following question on last year's Speak Up survey: Is your school doing a good job of preparing you for future jobs?

That is an amazingly and alarmingly low number. Even more alarming-- in relation to this and many other questions-- is how out of sync with those students are our school principals, district administrators, teachers, and parents. Witness the breakdown of the percentage of yes answers to the same question about job readiness received from each group: school principals, 66 percent; district administrators, 48 percent; teachers, 47 percent; parents, 43 percent.

There's even a 20-point margin between the students and the group whose viewpoint they are in closest accord with-- ironically, their parents.

This is but one chunk of stats available from Speak Up, an annual online survey coordinated by Project Tomorrow that collects, analyzes, and reports on the authentic, unfiltered voices of K-12 students, teachers, parents, and administrators. Take part in the 2008 survey at the Project Tomorrow website through Dec. 19.

Perhaps all of us in the educational technology community have at some point acknowledged a disparity between how students act in school and out of school, as well as a disconnect between the tools they use in school and out. A new concern of ours should be this enormous gap between how students assess their education and preparedness and how the adults around them feel about it. Do the kids perceive a real and serious problem, or are educators and parents more sensible and have a greater understanding of the big picture? And what to make of the nearly 20-point gap between principals and the other adults, not to mention the 40-plus-point gap between principals and students?

The hope of addressing this generational divide is one reason why T.H.E. Journal and the Education Group of 1105 Media, our publishing company, are delighted to announce the formation of a special partnership with Project Tomorrow. Starting with our January 2009 issue, Project Tomorrow will be providing data for the page of stats that closes out each issue of our magazine. Our thanks go out to Jeanne Hayes and Tom Greaves for drilling down the past two years to supply us with compelling data each month from their America's Digital Schools survey.

Look for facts and figures from the 2008 Speak Up survey in our publication and on our website. In the meantime, go take the survey.

-Geoffrey H. Fletcher, Editorial director

Featured

  • circuit patterns

    Anthropic Intros Lower-Cost Claude Sonnet 5

    Anthropic has launched Claude Sonnet 5, positioning the model as its most autonomous mid-tier offering to date and a lower-cost alternative to its flagship Opus 4.8 system. The company said the model can plan multi-step tasks, operate tools such as browsers and terminals, and complete agentic work at a level that previously required larger and more expensive models.

  • interconnected nodes with currency symbols

    Report: Half of Gen AI Projects Could Exceed Budget by 2028

    Organizations may be underestimating the cost of generative AI as they move from experimentation to production, according to Gartner's "10 Best Practices for Optimizing Generative and Agentic AI Costs" report.

  • Abstract background with a dynamic wave

    New Microsoft Initiative Aims to Help Move AI Projects from Experimentation to Production

    Microsoft has launched Frontier Company, making a $2.5 billion bet that the next competitive battleground in artificial intelligence will not be foundation models, but helping enterprises put those models to work.

  • lock symbol with quantum bits in dynamic motion

    Microsoft Accelerates Quantum-Safe Security Timeline

    Microsoft is speeding up its quantum-safe security timeline, noting that advances in quantum computing and new federal requirements have pushed post-quantum cryptography from a future planning issue into an immediate engineering priority.