Skip to main content
Add as a preferred source on Google


Ed Selects 25 i3 Grant Winners

The United States Department of Education has chosen 25 applicants to receive a total of more than $135 million in the fourth round of the Investing in Innovation (i3) competition. In order to receive the funds, the winners will be required to secure matching funds by December 11.

This year's winning applications deal with issues such as "initiatives for training parents and families in the skills and strategies that support their children's educational growth, and redesigning science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) course content and instructional practices to engage students and increase their academic achievement," according to a news release.

"In this era of rapid change, we must make sure that our students are keeping pace with the rigor, relevance and changing demands of the global job market," said U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan, in a prepared statement. "I am encouraged by the innovative ideas to accelerate student achievement demonstrated in these applications."

In the three previous rounds, projects in three categories, development, validation, and scale up, were eligible for funding. In the latest round, the department decided to focus on only the development and validation categories.

The 18 winners in the development category are:

The seven winners in the validation category are:

Candidates for i3 awards must raise 50 percent of their matching funds before any federal money is disbursed and provide evidence that they have received the other half within six months of the project's start date. If all of this year's winners raise their matching funds, there will be 117 i3 grantees working with "more than $1 billion in federal funds to address some of the most important challenges in education," according to information released by the department.

"The fourth round of the i3 competition continues to demonstrate that there are organizations across the country that are eager to implement a wide range of innovative and effective practices to improve educational outcomes for students," said Acting Assistant Deputy Secretary for Innovation and Improvement Nadya Chinoy Dabby, in a prepared statement. "Each year, we are able to grow the portfolio of solutions and the body of evidence that supports these practices."

Go to ed.gov to learn more about the i3 grant program.

About the Author

Joshua Bolkan is contributing editor for Campus Technology, THE Journal and STEAM Universe. He can be reached at [email protected].

Featured

  • digital graph

    Building Genuinely Data-Informed School Districts

    Schools today generate enormous amounts of data. The difference between collecting it and using it effectively often comes down to quality, access, and context.

  • Neon blue security locks with a single red highlight

    With AI, Cybersecurity Focus Shifts from Finding Flaws to Fixing Them

    For decades, one of cybersecurity's biggest challenges has been finding vulnerabilities before attackers do. A growing number of security professionals now say artificial intelligence is changing that equation, shifting the focus from discovering flaws to fixing them quickly enough to prevent exploitation.

  • Top View Shot in Elementary School Computer Science Classroom

    Education's Top 5 Technology Priorities and the Challenges Standing in the Way

    Cybersecurity ranks as the No. 1 priority for education technology leaders in the United States, according to the latest State of Ed Tech report from CoSN, yet insufficient cybersecurity staffing and the lack of a dedicated budget are key barriers.

  • Engineering team implements digital guardrails on AI

    3 Starting Points for Integrating AI Guardrails in K-12 Districts

    As education leaders start to craft an AI policy that is both practical and flexible enough to evolve with this fast-changing technology, there is at least one principle that should be foundational: AI should serve to augment human critical thinking and creativity but never replace human interaction and decision-making.