Robotic Infant Simulators Actually Promote Teen Pregnancy, Study Finds

Robotic infant simulators — or robot babies — used by schools to help prevent teen pregnancy actually have the opposite effect, according to a study published in the British health journal The Lancet.

Australian researchers randomly assigned nearly 3,000 teenage girls to one of two groups. Some received an automated doll (programmed to cry, sleep, eat and spoil its diapers on a realistic schedule, with sensors to track whether students are properly caring for it), while others received only standard health education. The researchers tracked the girls until they turned 20, using records from hospital and abortion clinics.

The results were surprising: 8 percent of the girls who received an infant simulator ended up giving birth, compared to just 4 percent of those who received standard health education. And 9 percent of the girls who received a robot baby had an abortion, compared to 6 percent who received standard health education.

“The infant simulator-based VIP program did not achieve its aim of reducing teenage pregnancy,” the researchers determined. “Girls in the intervention group were more likely to experience a birth or an induced abortion than those in the control group before they reached 20 years of age.”

Wisconsin-based Realityworks is the largest provider of infant simulators to schools in the United States and abroad. The company estimates it controls 95 percent of the infant-simulator market.

Shortly after the Lancet study was released, the company issued a statement calling The Lancet study “deeply flawed” and criticizing the researchers’ findings as “junk science” — despite their rigorous methodology. The company complained that the Australian schools in the study did not use the full Realityworks curriculum.

“The study had nothing to do with us, our curriculum or our RealCare Baby infant simulators, nor are its conclusions about us credible,” the company said in its statement.

A Bloomberg Businessweek investigation late last year found that two-thirds of U.S. school districts buy some kind of infant simulator, and that the Realityworks model (which costs about $650 apiece) had become “a staple of American education, reaching more than 6 million students at 17,000 schools.”

In addition to robot babies, Realityworks now produces many other “experiential learning technologies,” including a growing number of simulators for career and technical education programs, including nursing, welding and animal science, Education Week reported last week.

About the Author

Richard Chang is associate editor of THE Journal. He can be reached at [email protected].

Featured

  • group of smiling teachers

    NAAIC Expands AI Workforce Development Efforts to High Schools

    The National Applied AI Consortium, a National Science Foundation-funded initiative led by Miami Dade College, Houston City College, and Maricopa Community Colleges focused on artificial intelligence education and workforce development, is expanding its mission into high schools.

  • artificial intelligence on laptop

    OpenAI Plans to Combine AI Products into Desktop 'Superapp'

    OpenAI is reportedly developing a desktop application that would incorporate several of its emerging AI products into a single platform, according to reports, marking the latest step in the company's effort to transform ChatGPT from a standalone chatbot into a broader productivity and automation environment.

  • abstract glowing cube outlines

    Microsoft Positions Windows as a Platform for AI Agents

    The recent Microsoft Build 2026 developer conference highlighted a significant shift in the company's Windows strategy. Rather than presenting artificial intelligence as a collection of standalone features, Microsoft is increasingly positioning Windows as an operating environment for AI agents.

  • digital file folder with padlock symbol

    FERPA Was Written for File Cabinets, Not Cloud Servers

    Passed in 1974, FERPA was never meant to govern cloud-based platforms, artificial intelligence, or the invisible flow of student data across third-party vendors. Our students deserve better.