New Virginia Department of Education Website Communicates Quality of Schools

As states are busy submitting their response to the new regulations set by the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), the Virginia Department of Education (VDOE) worked with AIS Network (AISN) to develop a website that captures report card data and puts it into context that is meaningful and useful for parents, students and the general public.

State report cards are one component of the No Child Left Behind Act that carried over when President Obama signed ESSA in December 2015. But a recent report from the Data Quality Campaign — which reviewed report cards from all 50 states and the District of Columbia — found that only a handful of report cards are new, while others are inadequate. The nonprofit concluded that finding and interpreting state report cards can be confusing since information is scattered across many websites, some of which are outdated by a few years.

VDOE’s new School Quality Profiles site serves as an online data tool that clearly communicates the status of achievements of Virginia’s public schools, including “reports on gifted education programs, average class sizes and statistically valid surveys of students, teachers and other school employees on the learning environment,” according to a news release.

AISN, a high compliance and secure IT managed services expert serving the Commonwealth of Virginia and large enterprises, answered the 2015 General Assembly’s call to redesign online reports, according to the news release. The company created a site that can be assessed by mobile device. It is “Section 508 compliant, satisfies all the Virginia State IT Accessibility Requirements and Virginia.gov State Website Standards, and meets ADA Standards for Accessible Design,” the release said.

In a statement released by VDOE, Virginia State Superintendent Steven R. Staples said, “The interactive graphics of the School Quality Profiles reveal important facts about quality and performance that otherwise might be lost in the data. Users can drill down to exactly the level of information they want, and if there are achievement gaps or other areas in need of improvement, those become obvious as the user interacts with the display.”

To learn more about the site’s functionality, watch the video below. The School Quality Profiles site is now live.

About the Author

Sri Ravipati is Web producer for THE Journal and Campus Technology. She can be reached at [email protected].

Featured

  • hand touching glowing connected dots

    Registration Now Open for Tech Tactics in Education: Thriving in the Age of AI

    Tech Tactics in Education has officially opened registration for its May 7 virtual conference on "Thriving in the Age of AI." The annual event, brought to you by the producers of Campus Technology and THE Journal, offers hands-on learning and interactive discussions on the most critical technology issues and practices across K–12 and higher education.

  • teenager interacts with a chatbot on a computer screen

    Character.AI Rolls Out New Parental Insights Feature Amid Safety Concerns

    Chatbot platform Character.AI has introduced a new Parental Insights feature aimed at giving parents a window into their children's activity on the platform. The feature allows users under 18 to share a weekly report of their chatbot interactions directly with a parent's e-mail address.

  • laptop screen displaying a typed essay, on a child

    McGraw Hill Acquires Essaypop Digital Learning Tool

    Education company McGraw Hill has announced the acquisition of Essaypop, a cloud-based writing tool that will enhance the former's portfolio of personalized learning capabilities.

  • a professional worker in business casual attire interacting with a large screen displaying a generative AI interface in a modern office

    Study Finds Generative AI Could Inhibit Critical Thinking

    A new study on how knowledge workers engage in critical thinking found that workers with higher confidence in generative AI technology tend to employ less critical thinking to AI-generated outputs than workers with higher confidence in personal skills.