New Framework Offers Way to Validate OER Commitment

A new report proposes a framework by which open educational resource initiatives — and particularly those promulgated by for-profit organizations — can be measured. "Toward a Sustainable OER Ecosystem: The Case for OER Stewardship" has three purposes according to its authors: to help make sure "the OER community's values can be maintained as the movement scales"; to gauge the practices of "new entrants" to the OER field (especially those out to make money from it); and to build educator confidence in participating in OER, including those who contribute their own materials and may be uncertain regarding its use by for-profit publishers.

The CARE framework, as it's called, is applicable to all OER stakeholders — or "stewards," as the framework refers to them. Those include individuals, schools and affiliated organizations, both nonprofit and for-profit.

CARE is an acronym for four processes OER stewards need to maintain to show their "duty of care to the broader OER movement":

  • Contribute: Stewards need to contribute to the work of OER, whether in the form of funding or "in-kind" contributions, to perpetuate the "awareness, improvement and distribution" of OER;
  • Attribute: Stewards make sure to credit those who have created or remixed OER;
  • Release: Stewards help to make OER materials available in a form that can be released and used beyond the course and platform in which it was created or distributed; and
  • Empower: Stewards "strive to meet the diverse needs of all learners" and encourage participation by "new and non-traditional voices in OER creation and adoption."

The next step for the framework, according to Doug Levin, co-author of the report and president of EdTech Strategies, is to solicit stakeholder reaction, "to see what questions get raised and where we may have missed the mark or omitted something important."

"This isn't intended to be a document that orgs would sign on to, but there are many ways that it can be used to build a consensus in the field about expectations for those who want to work with OER and gain the support of the community," Levin explained.

Levin, along with his co-authors, Lisa Petrides, CEO and founder of the Institute for the Study of Knowledge Management in Education, and C. Edward Watson, an associate vice president at the Association of American Colleges and Universities, expects to present on the framework at education events over the coming year. The group also plans to release follow-up supplemental materials shortly, such as example practices "to help operationalize the framework and make it more concrete," he said. After that, "we'll see where we go."

The paper is available online at a new website and was distributed under a Creative Commons CC BY SA license.

About the Author

Dian Schaffhauser is a former senior contributing editor for 1105 Media's education publications THE Journal, Campus Technology and Spaces4Learning.

Featured

  • digital graph

    Building Genuinely Data-Informed School Districts

    Schools today generate enormous amounts of data. The difference between collecting it and using it effectively often comes down to quality, access, and context.

  • Neon blue security locks with a single red highlight

    With AI, Cybersecurity Focus Shifts from Finding Flaws to Fixing Them

    For decades, one of cybersecurity's biggest challenges has been finding vulnerabilities before attackers do. A growing number of security professionals now say artificial intelligence is changing that equation, shifting the focus from discovering flaws to fixing them quickly enough to prevent exploitation.

  • Top View Shot in Elementary School Computer Science Classroom

    Education's Top 5 Technology Priorities and the Challenges Standing in the Way

    Cybersecurity ranks as the No. 1 priority for education technology leaders in the United States, according to the latest State of Ed Tech report from CoSN, yet insufficient cybersecurity staffing and the lack of a dedicated budget are key barriers.

  • Engineering team implements digital guardrails on AI

    3 Starting Points for Integrating AI Guardrails in K-12 Districts

    As education leaders start to craft an AI policy that is both practical and flexible enough to evolve with this fast-changing technology, there is at least one principle that should be foundational: AI should serve to augment human critical thinking and creativity but never replace human interaction and decision-making.