Showing a Way with Words for Teacher Evals

Which term would be easier for a principal to use in a teacher evaluation: "unacceptable" or "improvement needed?" Which would you rather receive if you exceeded expectations: "distinguished" or "level 5?" These kinds of questions form the core of a recently published study by the National Council on Teacher Quality (NCTQ), which looked at the evaluation systems in 123 large districts to tally the terminology used in teacher ratings.

All but four of the districts used at least three ratings to identify teachers across the spectrum of their effectiveness; and most used four ratings. The most commonly used terms are "ineffective," "effective" and "highly effective."

According to the study, 17 different labels are in use in these districts to define teachers at the low end of performance and 18 labels are being used for those at the high end. And some of the districts use different terms, depending on whether the teacher is new to the field or an old hand. As the report noted, for example, in Florida and Virginia, early career teachers may receive a rating of "developing" to acknowledge their steep learning curve, while those who have been teaching for a while may receive a rating of "needs improvement."

Just two districts in the study completely avoided final ratings for their teachers. Lewisville Independent School District in Texas judges its teachers in a "holistic manner"; at the end of the school year the teacher and an evaluator "collaboratively" decide whether the teacher has met his or her goals for the year. In Vermont's Burlington School District, school leaders make recommendations to renew or not renew the teacher's contract or offer assistance or supervision.

NCTQ suggested that districts consider what they're trying to measure, to make sure their evaluation system allows them to convey that, and that it chooses language that a principal would be comfortable delivering in a teacher assessment.

A brief article sharing the results of the study is openly available on the NCTQ website.

About the Author

Dian Schaffhauser is a former senior contributing editor for 1105 Media's education publications THE Journal, Campus Technology and Spaces4Learning.

Featured

  • education funding and graduation symbols on wooden dice

    What Is the Education Freedom Tax Credit and How Will It Work?

    The federal Education Freedom Tax Credit (EFTC) is a new source of funding for education that could benefit 90% of students in states that have opted in to the program. However, some confusion and misconceptions exist surrounding details of the program, including which programs may qualify, how parents can apply for scholarships, and how public school students can benefit.

  • elementary schoolchildren using digital tablet in classroom

    CoSN: 3 Principles that Should Guide Screen Time Policies in Schools

    CoSN, the professional association for K-12 education technology leaders, has released new guidance to help schools navigate the screen time debate and develop technology policies that protect students while supporting learning.

  • Students using laptops in classroom

    Stop Asking Whether Students Can Use AI

    As generative AI has become embedded in the tools students use to search, write, create, translate, organize, and receive feedback, the boundary between "using AI" and "not using AI" has become increasingly difficult to define. More importantly, treating AI use as a binary choice does little to help students understand the different roles AI can appropriately play in learning.

  • abstract spiral of multi colored lights

    OpenAI's New Astra Model Reaches Critical Cyber Threshold

    OpenAI has introduced GPT-6 Astra, its most capable broadly deployed model and the first system the company says has reached the "Critical" cybersecurity capability threshold under its Preparedness Framework.