2 Indiana Virtual Schools Closing This Year and Next

Two schools that have come to represent all that can possibly go wrong with virtual public school education are set to close. According to reporting by Chalkbeat, Indiana Virtual School will cease to operate after September; and Indiana Virtual Pathways Academy will close at the end of the next school year.

The decision shouldn't be a surprise. Lately, Indiana lawmakers have been trying to get the state's virtual schools under control by setting new rules for how they operate.

A notice on the Indiana Virtual School website said that "pursuant to an agreement" between the school and its charter authorizer, Daleville Community Schools," it would "terminate operations," as of September 17, 2019.

The school also directed online visitors to "consider applying" to its "sister institution," Indiana Virtual Pathways Academy as an alternative. But that virtual school included a similar warning message, this one encouraging people to enroll their students before September 13, 2019. After that, it announced, by agreement with its authorizer, the Daleville district, it would be unable to accept applications or enroll students and would stop providing instruction altogether after June 30, 2020.

According to Chalkbeat, the schools had enrolled over 7,000 students at the start of the previous school year, with thousands more already on their rosters. For example, Indiana Virtual School had some 10,000 students during the last school year. However, according to district analysis, just one in 10 students (about 850) stayed for the entire year; yet of those who remained, 729 earned no credits during the first semester; and 523 earned none during the second semester. Those were the kinds of details that finally pushed Daleville's school board to begin the work of revoking the schools' charters.

The state estimated that the two schools received some $80 million in public funding between 2016 and 2018. Because they failed to file yearly audits, it's "unclear" how the money was spent. Chalkbeat said the state was auditing the schools' finances, and a full audit would be issued in the future.

Members of the board have also put Daleville in its sights. The district collected an estimated $2.4 million during that three-year period in "fees," tied to its work of overseeing the schools. As the board's chairman, B.J. Watts, told Chalkbeat reporter Stephanie Wang, "Ultimately, the responsibility falls on Daleville, 100 percent... They’re not doing this out of the goodness of their heart. They’re being paid for oversight."

At a recent meeting the State Board of Education considered a recommendation to "recover" overpayment of funds distributed to both charter schools and the authorizing district. All three entities are fighting the proposal.

About the Author

Dian Schaffhauser is a former senior contributing editor for 1105 Media's education publications THE Journal, Campus Technology and Spaces4Learning.

Featured

  • digital graph

    Building Genuinely Data-Informed School Districts

    Schools today generate enormous amounts of data. The difference between collecting it and using it effectively often comes down to quality, access, and context.

  • Wi-Fi icon on dark blue circuit background

    FCC to Conduct 'Top-to-Bottom' Review of E-Rate Program

    The FCC is laying the groundwork for a comprehensive review of its E-Rate program, the federal initiative that provides K–12 schools and public libraries with discounts on internet, WiFi, and telecommunications services to ensure equitable digital access.

  • Human Hand Assembling Digital Data Blocks

    Report: AI Impact Relies on Strong Data Foundation

    High-impact AI implementations are more likely to treat data architecture, governance, and operationalization as strategic requirements, according to the 2026 Blueprint report from TDWI.

  • Engineering team implements digital guardrails on AI

    3 Starting Points for Integrating AI Guardrails in K-12 Districts

    As education leaders start to craft an AI policy that is both practical and flexible enough to evolve with this fast-changing technology, there is at least one principle that should be foundational: AI should serve to augment human critical thinking and creativity but never replace human interaction and decision-making.