Gale in Context: For Educators Adds Assessments and New Lesson Plans

  • By Kate Lucariello
  • 04/06/23

Gale, an educational content provider, has added built-in assessments and hundreds of new, standards-based lesson plans to its Gale in Context: For Educators database program.

The company, part of Cengage Group, developed the new features based on user feedback with the aim of helping teachers be more effective in helping students achieve positive outcomes. Some new features include:

  • Built-in standards-based assessments that measure student progress and identify where work is needed, with new assessment questions continually being added;

  • Pre-written lesson plans that point to curriculum-based content, including digital content in a variety of formats;

  • Lesson plans in new subject areas, such as financial literacy and digital literacy;

  • Lessons focused across the curriculum in a variety of subject areas, such as science and engineering and social studies, built on inquiry frameworks;

  • Tools to include and customize any piece of external content such as articles, news media, primary sources, and more, with the ability to embed notes and annotations;

  • Tools to collaborate with other educators, including new and substitute teachers, on lesson planning;

  • Tools to push content directly into existing learning management systems (LMS) like Canvas and Schoology with no separate links needed.

Coming soon, Gale said, will be the ability to “score short-answer response questions, which will allow for greater flexibility when checking student comprehension.”

These product updates began automatically appearing on March 31, 2023, Gale said, with the integration being “seamless” and requiring no action on the part of users.

“Teaching resources that improve fairness and accessibility for all students are a primary focus as education leaders consider how to leverage funding strategically,” said Shawn Clark, senior vice president of Gale's domestic learning business. “Gale In Context: For Educators’ use of formative evaluations helps teachers better determine where further support is required, enabling them to meet students where they are.”

To learn more about these enhancements, visit the Gale in Context: For Educators blog.

About the Author

Kate Lucariello is a former newspaper editor, EAST Lab high school teacher and college English teacher.

Featured

  • young child sitting at a table, using a tablet with an AI-generated interface

    Research: 1 in 3 Kids Use AI for Learning

    In a survey of parents with children aged 8 or younger, nearly a third of respondents (29%) said their child has used AI for school-related learning, according to a new report from Common Sense Media.

  • robotic elements such as a mechanical arm, AI brain, microchip, and wheeled robot in a muted blue color scheme

    California District to Build New Robotics Facility for Student Creativity and Collaboration

    California's Fremont Union High School District recently announced that construction has begun on a new Robotics Facility on the campus of Cupertino High School. The 14,500-square-foot facility will serve students at high schools across the entire district, providing purpose-built spaces for student creativity and collaboration.

  • digital illustration of Estonia with glowing neural network-like connections spreading across the map

    Estonia to Roll Out ChatGPT Edu for all Secondary Schools

    In a nationwide artificial intelligence program dubbed "AI Leap 2025," the country of Estonia plans to provide free access to leading AI applications for all secondary school students and teachers. The initiative will launch with a rollout of ChatGPT Edu to 20,000 high school students in grades 10-11 and their 3,000 teachers, beginning Sept. 1.

  • a professional worker in business casual attire interacting with a large screen displaying a generative AI interface in a modern office

    Study Finds Generative AI Could Inhibit Critical Thinking

    A new study on how knowledge workers engage in critical thinking found that workers with higher confidence in generative AI technology tend to employ less critical thinking to AI-generated outputs than workers with higher confidence in personal skills.