Majority of Districts Lack Dedicated Cybersecurity Funding

According to a recent CoSN survey, most school districts (61%) do not have dedicated funding to keep networks and data secure, instead relying on general funds to pay for cybersecurity efforts. For its 2025 State of EdTech District Leadership report, the association polled 645 ed tech leaders across the United States about evolving cybersecurity measures and other issues faced by today's schools and districts.

Thirteen percent of respondents said they use district dedicated funds for cybersecurity; 9% cited federal funding sources, and 7% look to "other" sources to pay for district cybersecurity measures.

What are those funds being spent on? More than three-quarters of respondents (78%) said they are investing in cybersecurity monitoring, detection, and response tactics. Other areas of spending include:

  • Endpoint protection (cited by 65% of respondents);
  • Advanced/next-generation firewall (57%); and
  • Identity protection and authentication (57%).

Surprisingly, respondents' perception of various cyber risks was low, the report found. While phishing scams were rated as high-risk by 27% of respondents, unauthorized disclosure of student data and ransomware attacks were each perceived as high-risk by just 13%. Identity theft came in at 10%, and malware and DDoS attacks each came in at 7%.

"These risk assessments do not appear take into account the value of K-12 student data to cyber criminals," the report warned. "Risks are very high considering the data security incidents experienced by better-funded, better-resourced public and business sector organizations. With current federal policy changes and the funding cuts to the Multi-State Information Sharing and Analysis Center (MS-ISAC) which had provided cybersecurity training at no cost, cybersecurity risks for districts are poised to increase."

Still, the vast majority of respondents (94%) said their district has plans in place to improve their data privacy practices. Areas of focus include:

  • Data security: protecting the confidentiality of student data across all media and auditing regularly (cited by 71% of respondents);
  • Professional development: privacy and security training for all staff and related resources for parents (64%);
  • Business: vetting processes and data protection agreements for third parties receiving student data (44%);
  • Leadership: guidance and resources to direct transparent use and governance of student data (41%); and
  • Classroom: building privacy knowledge while advancing curricular goals (36%).

In fact, districts are increasingly adopting processes to vet free ed tech tools before integrating them into teaching and learning:

  • 69% require review by IT, up from 60% in 2023;
  • 59% utilize an "approved" apps list, compared to 42% in 2023;
  • 56% have an established process for adding apps to the "approved" list, compared to 40% in 2023;
  • 39% have a designated person in place to approve free apps, compared to 30% in 2023; and
  • 23% review all license renewals at the school level, up slightly from 22% in 2023.

The full report is available on the CoSN site here.

About the Author

Rhea Kelly is editor in chief for Campus Technology, THE Journal, and Spaces4Learning. She can be reached at [email protected].

Featured

  • Abstract background with digital shield made of data particles glowing blue blocking against cyber attacks

    AI Attacks Push Organizations Toward Autonomous Cybersecurity Defense

    Artificial intelligence is raising the stakes of cyber conflict as attackers use the technology to accelerate reconnaissance, uncover vulnerabilities, and launch attacks faster than many security teams can respond, according to a new report from agentic AI security company Kai.

  • Digital document and folder warning alert with error

    When Cyber Attacks Disrupt Learning, Recovery Matters More than Ever

    As schools become more dependent on digital platforms for instruction, grading, student services, and family communication, resilience depends not only on preventing attacks, but on how quickly leaders can restore trusted data, recover essential services, and keep disruptions from cascading across the school community.

  • A digital shield composed of glowing particles

    Microsoft Combines Sentinel and Defender Capabilities for Agentic Security Operations

    Microsoft is combining its security information and event management and threat protection products within Microsoft Defender, creating what the company calls an Integrated Security Operations Center built for an era of AI-driven attacks.

  • A glowing digital brain with neural connections and light trails

    AI Giants: It May Be Time to Slow Down

    Leaders in the artificial intelligence industry have warned for years that increasingly capable AI systems could eventually become dangerous, all the while continuing to race to build them. Now, their sentiments have changed.