Policy & Advocacy

Education Groups 'Extremely Concerned' over EETT Cut in Obama Budget

If adopted by Congress without alteration, President Obama's proposed fiscal year 2011 budget would pump an additional $3.5 billion into education. But it would also cut the sole source of dedicated federal funding for education technology, and that has three prominent ed tech advocacy groups worried.

The three groups--the Consortium for School Networking (CoSN), the International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE), and the State Educational Technology Directors Association (SETDA)--issued a joint statement Wednesday calling for the return of EETT to the federal budget. The groups said that they agreed with some aspects of the budget but that education technology is simply too critical a program to eliminate.

The proposed 2011 budget would cut all funding to the Enhancing Education Through Technology (EETT) provision of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), which had received $100 million in federal funding in the 2010 budget, plus $650 million via the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act (ARRA). EETT is the program that has provided the sole source of federal funding specifically earmarked for education technologies. It's designed to support state, district, and school efforts to "integrate technology effectively into [the] classroom with the goal of improving student academic achievement."

"While there are elements of the President's proposed budget that are laudable, we remain extremely concerned that the Administration has elected to defund EETT in its FY11 Budget Proposal and urge the Administration and Congress to restore adequate funding for this critical program," the three groups said in a joint statement. "Congress and the President included EETT as a core provision of the current ESEA law in recognition of the importance of driving the next generation of innovations in teaching and learning, assessment and continuous improvement, and cost-efficiency in coordination with other federal, state and local school improvement strategies. We fear that years of investments through EETT and the E-Rate, coupled with American Recovery and Reinvestment Act investment, may be devalued or lost entirely without adequately funding EETT or a successor program."

The response followed the release of a document by the federal government supporting education technology in general but saying that funding for such technologies would be integrated into broader programs, rather than dedicated to technology itself. This, the groups indicated, is an admirable goal, but they said they think something more "tangible" is called for.

The joint statement continued: "We were very pleased to hear the Obama Administration's commitment to infusing technology across the range of its proposed programs and school reform initiatives announced this week. We fully concur that, as the President stated, 'technology, when used creatively and effectively, can transform education and training.' We would like to see those sentiments translated into specific, tangible allocations that meaningfully incorporate technology throughout the Administration's new vision for ESEA and to the benefit of all students. In our view, a newly reauthorized ESEA must infuse technology across all program areas and be supported by targeted research, evaluation and investments that enhance state and local educational technology leadership and capacity, educator professional development, and technology-based innovation."

Two of the groups, CoSN and ISTE, also released their own individual statements, using language that was at times a bit stronger at times.

"We have deep misgivings about the Administration's decision to 'consolidate' the Enhancing Education Through Technology (EETT) program in the FY 11 budget," said ISTE CEO Don Knezek in a statement released today. "This decision removes direct funding for education technology at a critical time. We do, however, commend the Obama Administration's stated commitment to infuse technology throughout PK-12 education and we look forward to working with the Administration and Congress to make this vision a reality."

He said that technology needs to be used as the "backbone of school improvement" and that it needs to be infused throughout teaching and learning, teacher professional development programs, and assessment and that EETT is one of the programs that makes such infusion possible.

"We must ensure technology expertise is infused throughout our schools and classrooms--particularly through programs like EETT--and that we are continuously upgrading educators' classroom technology skills as a pre-requisite of 'highly effective' teaching," he said. "We must boost student learning through real data and assessment efforts. And we must work together to leverage education technology as a gateway for college and career readiness so that our K-12 systems can help fulfill the President's pledge to make the United States tops in the world when it comes to college-completion rates. We cannot and must not deny policymakers and educators the resources they require to provide all students with the globally competitive education they so desperately need."

CoSN, meanwhile, focused on the ways in which the zero-funding of EETT could impact 21st century teaching and learning, saying that cuts in funding could impact students' readiness for college and careers and would be "devastating" to education as a whole.

""We are deeply concerned about the President's proposal to consolidate the Enhancing Education Through Technology (EETT) program, which would leave our nation with no dedicated federal education technology funding," the group said. "For our children to succeed in today's global economy and beyond, it is critical that they be equipped with the skills necessary to become lifelong learners and compete with their peers around the globe. For our educators to succeed, they need technology professional development to understand how to powerfully use technology for learning. Eliminating EETT--a program that is essential to making our students college and career ready and our teachers the best they can be--would be devastating at every level of our education system."

All of the groups said they looked forward to working with both the Obama administration and Congress during the budget process to help "usher in a new era of dramatic educational improvement, supported by smart, strategic and sustainable investments in educational technology."

A complete copy of ISTE's statement can be found here. A complete copy of CoSN's statement can be found here.

Comments

Fri, Feb 19, 2010 tac Ohio

Stretch, I work for a district that has installed many Smartbords in classrooms. Training is everything and once teachers see what can be done on with the boards, they do not want to lose them. I hear immediately if there is a problem with a Smartboard, and it is a prioity to get it fixed. Teachers that do not yet have boards yet, want them. The ones we use have excellent software, online free training and tutorials, as well as teacher created lessons. There is also onsite training available from the company and also from other PD providers. We also have distance learning capability in several classrooms which is well used. I think your district needs to get a couple of teachers trained and excited about using this technology.

Fri, Feb 5, 2010 Editor

People commenting here and in related stories seem to agree that technology is a good thing for schools but also point to the failure to implement technology properly. At what level do you think the problem is originating? ANd how can it be overcome? --David Nagel

Fri, Feb 5, 2010 Andy Tucson, Az

I'm all about ed-tech, but I have to ask what have these programs accomplished besides creating a market of ed-tech companies? Can anybody point to a specific large scale technology implementation that improved student achievement over the long term, not anecdotal gushing but true data? I think it is great that we are finally seeing a shift away from large formula allocations and move towards competitive innovation and results based grants. I've never, in 9 years in education, seen ed tech accomplish anything when it is not explicitly tied to academic outcomes. Technology is an accelerator and a force multiplier. If you have a good process, it magnifies that process. However, when you have a bad process it magnifies that as well. Maybe having these funds intertwined with other types of funding will force technology projects to be more focused on student outcomes. Technology supporting the efforts of school reformers, is more important than trying to use technology to reform schools.

Fri, Feb 5, 2010 MC

As a preface to my comments, I am a STEM teacher and member of ISTE who loves technology and uses it extensively in my classroom. At the present time our educational system is failing many kids. There are a myriad of factors which go into this and plenty of blame to spread around to all stakeholders. I applaud the administrations actions to shake up the status quo. What we have right now is a system that's not working, so why should we keep pouring money into the same programs? As for the claim, "Eliminating EETT--a program that is essential to making our students college and career ready and our teachers the best they can be..." Our students aren't college and career ready and many of our teachers are not the best they can be. So let's be open to new ideas and different ways of thinking about education.

Thu, Feb 4, 2010 Deana

Stretch - I understand your frustration. Interactive whiteboards are expensive and it is shameful for them to sit unused. Hence the need for teacher professional development (and CTAP and EETT funding). These whiteboards are an awesome tool in the classroom, however the teachers MUST be trained in their use and they MUST have local support. At our district we insist upon this. Additionally, these whiteboards do make a difference in the classroom - The students are clearly more engaged in their learning, they are more intersted in what is being taught, and they can become active learners (and teachers) when using the boards themselves. It is very sad to know that at some schools this wonderful technology is going to waste. What kind of boards are they? We'll take them!

Thu, Feb 4, 2010

It sounds like teachers need professional development concerning the whiteboards.

Thu, Feb 4, 2010 Stretch

I volunteer at an elementary school that last summer used "use it or lose it" technology funds to put large TV screens in each room and office, and interactive whiteboards in all rooms third grade and above. I'm in the school typically four days a week. After about six months, I have seen the screens used a few times; a kindergarten teacher shows videos to her kids during rest time, a fourth grade teacher has the kids check the weather, I showed a video to a third grade class once to supplement a book I read to them. The only time I've seen the white boards used interactively was during a PTO meeting when the president showed that she seemed to know her way around. I'm sure I'm missing a lot, but I'm also sure this equipment is not being used enough to justify its cost. One teacher pulls down the old projection screen in front of the interactive white board--and uses the overhead projector. As a taxpayer, it bothers me that equipment is being bought and installed although it seems to be unwanted, or at least under-valued. Meanwhile, the school loses its string music program, class sizes grow, and the library is at risk.

Thu, Feb 4, 2010 Chris

As a direct recipient of EETT technology in the form of a classroom laptops I am equally concerned that this may mean the downfall of educational technology progress. My students have greatly benefited from the use of these funds and are engaged in ways that are unattainable without these computers. I hold out hope that the administration will make an unbiased assessment of the program and provide matching funding in the budget. If not the technological infrastructure will crumble and with that student engagement will deteriorate. We are living in a time where students are using technology at every moment and if we as educators do not keep up with this we will lose a whole generation of young people.

Add your Comment

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above

Biweekly Ed Tech Poll

Does your district sometimes make classroom recordings available online for students?


White Papers:

  • Linking Assessment to Instruction with Acuity McGraw-Hill

    Discover how the award-winning Acuity® InFormative Assessment™ solution helps you improve achievement for all students with a comprehensive integrated solution for interim and formative assessment and aligned instruction. Read more...