$100,000 To Be Awarded to Technology Innovators in Education

Instructure is awarding $100,000 in grants to K-12 schools, colleges, and universities for innovative technology programs. Instructure is the maker of the Canvas learning management system and the Canvas Network MOOC platform.

The grants are being offered as part of Instructure's effort to promote technological innovation within education by rewarding promising technology programs and initiatives. The awards were announced at the Educause 2013 conference, taking place this week in Anaheim, CA.

"We want to stimulate and reward creative thinking within the existing educational community to create a vibrant ecosystem of new technologies to advance education," said Brian Whitmer, Instructure's cofounder and chief learning officer, in a prepared statement. "The conversation around technology's role in remaking education has been largely dominated by third-party vendors. We want to see what can happen when the educational community works to drive innovation from within."

Five $10,000 grants will be awarded to projects in colleges and universities; 10 $5,000 prizes will be awarded to K-12 institutions. Entries will be judged by two independent panels.

According to information provided by Instructure, the higher education panel will include Mike Caulfield, Washington State University; Larry Cooperman, OpenCourseware and University of California, Irvine; Jim Groom, University of Mary Washington; Josh Kim, Dartmouth College and Inside Higher Ed; George Siemens, Athabasca University; Jesse Stommel, University of Wisconsin-Madison and Hybrid Pedagogy; Audrey Watters, Hack Education; and Nancy White, Full Circle Associates.

The K-12 panel will include Steven Anderson, Web 2.0 Classroom; Jaime Casap, Google; Sean Judkins, Horry County Schools; Chris Lehman, Science Leadership Academy; Scott McLeod, Prairie Lakes Area Education Agency; Linda Nathan, Boston Arts Academy; and Tom Vander Ark, Getting Smart and Learn Capital.

Submissions are due Jan. 20. Further information about the competition can be found on Instructure's site.

About the Author

David Nagel is the former editorial director of 1105 Media's Education Group and editor-in-chief of THE Journal, STEAM Universe, and Spaces4Learning. A 30-year publishing veteran, Nagel has led or contributed to dozens of technology, art, marketing, media, and business publications.

He can be reached at [email protected]. You can also connect with him on LinkedIn at https://www.linkedin.com/in/davidrnagel/ .


Featured

  • AI toolbox containing a wrench, document icon, gears, and a network symbol

    Common Sense Media Releases Free AI Toolkit, AI Readiness & Implementation Guides

    Common Sense Media has developed an AI Toolkit for School Districts, available to educators free of charge, that provides guidelines and resources for implementing AI in education.

  • elementary school building with children outside, overlaid by a glowing data network and transparent graphs

    Toward a Holistic Approach to Data-Informed Decision-Making in Education

    With increasing access to data and powerful analytic tools, the temptation to reduce educational outcomes to mere numbers is strong. However, educational leadership demands a more holistic and thoughtful approach.

  • three silhouetted education technology leaders with thought bubbles containing AI-related icons

    Ed Tech Leaders Rank Generative AI as Top Tech Priority

    In a recent CoSN survey, an overwhelming majority of ed tech leaders (94%) said they see AI as having a positive impact on education. Respondents ranked generative AI as their top tech priority, with 80% reporting their districts have gen AI initiatives underway, or plan to in the current school year.

  • AI-powered individual working calmly on one side and a burnt-out person slumped over a laptop on the other

    AI's Productivity Gains Come at a Cost

    A recent academic study found that as companies adopt AI tools, they're not just streamlining workflows — they're piling on new demands. Researchers determined that "AI technostress" is driving burnout and disrupting personal lives, even as organizations hail productivity gains.