EiE Extends Engineering Curriculum to Preschool, Kindergarten

The Museum of Science of Boston's school curriculum division, EiE, has released two Engineering curricula, one for kindergarten and one for preschool and pre-K programs, the first of their kind of early learners. The new curricula join EiE's Engineering is Elementary, an engineering curriculum for grades 1–5 that the organization reported "has been used successfully by more than 15 million students and 165,000 teachers over the past 15 years."

The new curricula include EiE for Kindergarten and Wee Engineer, the latter for preschool-aged students. Wee Engineer is designed to ease students aged 3 and up "into the worlds of science and technology" and to guide them "through an age-appropriate, three-step engineering design process — Explore, Create and Improve — as they design a technology that solves a problem. Wee Engineer engages children in active, hands-on, inquiry-based engineering projects that foster children's agency as engineers and that are flexible enough to meet the needs and abilities of different kinds of learners. It gives young children the opportunity to embrace engineering before stereotypes about 'who can engineer' take hold, and is designed to fit  within the existing routines of preschool and Pre-K classrooms."

Meanwhile, EiE for Kindergarten includes two units comprising seven lessons each designed to teach students "to investigate properties and uses of materials, make evidence-based decisions and practice working collaboratively. An age-appropriate, five-step engineering design process — Ask, Imagine, Plan, Create, Improve — guides children through flexible, open-ended challenges. Built specifically for the typical kindergarten classroom structure, EiE for Kindergarten aligns to NGSS kindergarten science and engineering performance expectations and connects with other school subjects including science, English language arts, and math. It is designed to build interest and confidence in STEM as kids aged 5 and 6 develop socially, emotionally, physically and cognitively," according to EiE.

"This program is excellent for this age," said Yesenia Torres, a pre-K teacher from Lewisville, TX, in a prepared statement. "My students are only four years old, and I was amazed by the ideas they would come up with. I am completely fascinated with the idea of letting them know that we are all engineers."

About the Author

David Nagel is the former editorial director of 1105 Media's Education Group and editor-in-chief of THE Journal, STEAM Universe, and Spaces4Learning. A 30-year publishing veteran, Nagel has led or contributed to dozens of technology, art, marketing, media, and business publications.

He can be reached at [email protected]. You can also connect with him on LinkedIn at https://www.linkedin.com/in/davidrnagel/ .


Featured

  • digital graph

    Building Genuinely Data-Informed School Districts

    Schools today generate enormous amounts of data. The difference between collecting it and using it effectively often comes down to quality, access, and context.

  • Neon blue security locks with a single red highlight

    With AI, Cybersecurity Focus Shifts from Finding Flaws to Fixing Them

    For decades, one of cybersecurity's biggest challenges has been finding vulnerabilities before attackers do. A growing number of security professionals now say artificial intelligence is changing that equation, shifting the focus from discovering flaws to fixing them quickly enough to prevent exploitation.

  • Top View Shot in Elementary School Computer Science Classroom

    Education's Top 5 Technology Priorities and the Challenges Standing in the Way

    Cybersecurity ranks as the No. 1 priority for education technology leaders in the United States, according to the latest State of Ed Tech report from CoSN, yet insufficient cybersecurity staffing and the lack of a dedicated budget are key barriers.

  • Engineering team implements digital guardrails on AI

    3 Starting Points for Integrating AI Guardrails in K-12 Districts

    As education leaders start to craft an AI policy that is both practical and flexible enough to evolve with this fast-changing technology, there is at least one principle that should be foundational: AI should serve to augment human critical thinking and creativity but never replace human interaction and decision-making.