Free iPad App Lets Teachers Give Quick Feedback

A new, free app for the iPad allows teachers to give students quick feedback in multiple forms. Created by a former Chicago high school teacher, Classkick shows students' efforts on the iPad in a whiteboard-like environment as they work through problems and activities, allowing the instructor to provide real-time feedback.

The app includes "quick buttons," a list of common responses the teacher will use in his or her comments, which can be plucked from the list and dropped onto a student's whiteboard. "Stickers" serve a similar purpose, enabling the instructor to provide a virtual gold star to the learner's work.

To create a lesson the teacher can grab a screenshot from another source, such as a Web page, crop the content to create a digital worksheet, add images and audio and rearrange assignments.

A "student helper" feature, available with an "allow students to help each other" checkbox, lets the teacher make student whiteboards public to other students for the purposes of adding their feedback and help. That function lets instructors monitor interactions, turn off student access, view who has interacted with whom and add their own comments alongside those of a student reviewer.

 Classkick shows students efforts on the iPad in a whiteboard-like environment as they work through problems and activities, allowing the instructor to provide real-time feedback.
Classkick shows students' efforts on the iPad in a whiteboard-like environment as they work through problems and activities, allowing the instructor to provide real-time feedback.

 

Company founder Andrew Rowland said in a statement that the idea for the app — providing feedback instantly — was the single "most effective learning intervention" in education. He added that students using his app "get three times more feedback than before, and teachers cut their grading time in half."

An App Store reviewer said he considers Classkick a "game changer" for assessment. "I felt so limited with other apps in only being able to ask multiple choice questions or only getting solutions to math problems and missing out on my students' work. When the overall class scored 80 percent ... I was always left with the question in how do I help that 20 percent?" Now, he added, "I have the capability to see all 100 percent of my students' work in real time."

About the Author

Dian Schaffhauser is a former senior contributing editor for 1105 Media's education publications THE Journal, Campus Technology and Spaces4Learning.

Featured

  • hand touching glowing connected dots

    Registration Now Open for Tech Tactics in Education: Thriving in the Age of AI

    Tech Tactics in Education has officially opened registration for its May 7 virtual conference on "Thriving in the Age of AI." The annual event, brought to you by the producers of Campus Technology and THE Journal, offers hands-on learning and interactive discussions on the most critical technology issues and practices across K–12 and higher education.

  • teenager interacts with a chatbot on a computer screen

    Character.AI Rolls Out New Parental Insights Feature Amid Safety Concerns

    Chatbot platform Character.AI has introduced a new Parental Insights feature aimed at giving parents a window into their children's activity on the platform. The feature allows users under 18 to share a weekly report of their chatbot interactions directly with a parent's e-mail address.

  • laptop screen displaying a typed essay, on a child

    McGraw Hill Acquires Essaypop Digital Learning Tool

    Education company McGraw Hill has announced the acquisition of Essaypop, a cloud-based writing tool that will enhance the former's portfolio of personalized learning capabilities.

  • a professional worker in business casual attire interacting with a large screen displaying a generative AI interface in a modern office

    Study Finds Generative AI Could Inhibit Critical Thinking

    A new study on how knowledge workers engage in critical thinking found that workers with higher confidence in generative AI technology tend to employ less critical thinking to AI-generated outputs than workers with higher confidence in personal skills.