Common Core, Obamacare and the Numbers Game

With field tests underway, will CCSS reach the same tipping point that the Affordable Care Act has?

Christopher Piehler

The Common Core State Standards and the Affordable Care Act have a few big things in common. They are both enormous social initiatives that began with noble goals. (Despite the current hyperpartisan political climate, I think we can all agree that developing 21st century educational standards for our public schools is a good idea, as is improving access to healthcare.) 

Both CCSS and the ACA have, of course, faced political opposition. Many of the ACA’s most vocal critics have called it an intrusion of federal power into a state-level issue. I believe this reaction helped create some of the opposition to Common Core, which is based on the misconception that the standards are a federal initiative. This backlash led to Indiana’s recent withdrawal from the standards. 

Both CCSS and the ACA have also been hampered by rocky rollouts. The troubles with the healthcare.gov website have been covered exhaustively, and the Common Core assessments have had their share of troubles, including opposition from parents and teachers, postponed field tests and states switching assessment providers. In fact, American Federation of Teachers President Randi Weingarten was quoted as saying, “You think the Obamacare implementation is bad? The implementation of the Common Core is far worse.” 

Despite its troubles, the ACA reached a tipping point at the end of March. With more than 7 million people signed up for health insurance through the exchanges, the law now has millions of citizens on its side, not to mention a deep-pocketed healthcare industry that is welcoming all those new customers. 

Common Core (which has its own powerful allies in the business world) also reached an important milestone at the end of March, by which point PARCC and Smarter Balanced had administered hundreds of thousands of field tests of the new assessments. The assessments certainly face more obstacles on the road to implementation next spring, but as more educators get comfortable with them, Common Core is looking like it, too, will win the numbers game.

About the Author

Christopher Piehler is the former editor-in-chief of THE Journal.

Featured

  • hand touching glowing connected dots

    Registration Now Open for Tech Tactics in Education: Thriving in the Age of AI

    Tech Tactics in Education has officially opened registration for its May 7 virtual conference on "Thriving in the Age of AI." The annual event, brought to you by the producers of Campus Technology and THE Journal, offers hands-on learning and interactive discussions on the most critical technology issues and practices across K–12 and higher education.

  • outline of a modern school building as glowing blue geometric shapes, surrounded by binary code streams, with golden orbs and lines representing funding, set against a dark gray gradient with faint grid patterns

    FCC Cybersecurity Pilot Participants Selected

    The Federal Communications Commission has officially selected the participants for its Schools and Libraries Cybersecurity Pilot, the three-year program exploring the use of Universal Service funds to improve school and library defenses against cyber attacks.

  • Google Classroom tools

    Google Announces Classroom Updates, New Tools for Chromebooks

    Google has introduced a variety of features across its products for education, announced recently at the 2025 BETT ed tech event in London. Among the additions are enhancements to Google Classroom and new tools for Chromebooks, "designed to help address the diverse needs of students around the world," Google said in a blog post.

  • group of elementary school students designing video games on computers in a modern classroom with a teacher, depicted in a geometric and abstract style

    Using Video Game Design to Teach Literacy Skills

    The Max Schoenfeld School, a public school in the Bronx serving one of the poorest communities in the nation, is taking an innovative approach to improving student literacy.