Research: Credit Recovery Students Do Worse in Online Algebra Classes than Face-to-Face

Summer school students studying Algebra I online for credit recovery don't do as well as those in traditional classes. The results of a study done by the American Institutes for Research (AIR) and the University of Chicago Consortium on School Research found that more students in the face-to-face courses earned passing grades and scored higher in end-of-course assessments than learners doing their studies strictly online.

The research project involved 1,224 students in grade 9 attending 17 public schools in Chicago, all of whom failed second semester Algebra I. They all enrolled in summer schools during 2011 or 2012 to make up the course and were randomly assigned to either online or face-to-face instruction. The study encompassed 76 classes evenly split between online and face-to-face. Both classes met every day for about four hours for three to four weeks. Class size, student characteristics and prior achievement levels were comparable for all of the students.

The authors focused on that course particularly, they reported, because it heralds the prospect of whether or not a student will earn a high school degree. Those who fail are less likely to graduate. In Chicago, specifically, about a third of ninth graders fail one or both semesters of the course. Among those students who failed both semesters of Algebra I during 2005-2006, only 15 percent ended up graduating within four years.

The research organizations are calling this study the "first major examination" of student success in the use of online programs for credit recovery, a practice that is gaining a reputation as being more engaging and offering a more personalized approach for students. In fact, they noted, online study for credit recovery is one of the fastest expanding areas for K-12 education. Online credit recovery practices vary from those courses with virtual labs and little teacher input to versions that include labs with intensive one-on-one online tutoring.

In this project, the online courses used a popular packaged curriculum from Fuel Education (formerly Aventa) that included Web-based course software and an online teacher who communicated individually with students. Students in these sections also had an in-class mentor, a common best practice pushed among online course providers.

As the study reported:

  • Three in 10 (31 percent) of students in the online course earned an A, B or C grade compared to 53 percent in the face-to-face course;
  • The online students scored lower on end-of-course assessments (with 38 percent of the questions answered correctly) compared to those in the traditional classes (40 percent). The exams used items that appeared previously on the National Assessment of Educational Progress, the organization that issues the Nation's Report Card;
  • Seven in 10 (71 percent) of students in both kinds of courses recovered credit, but the rate was lower for online students than face-to-face students (66 percent vs. 76 percent);
  • People in the online courses found the course to be "significantly more difficult" and class expectations "less clear" than students in the traditional classes. The online students also reported "significantly lower enjoyment of and confidence" in the subject of math. The one area where they did show a more positive experience was with their comfort in using a computer; and
  • The researchers found no differences between the two groups in terms of their likelihood to earn credit in subsequent math classes or to be on track for graduation by the end of their second year in high school. Overall, however, students in both types of courses had "generally low-performing trajectories."

"For some of the most highly at-risk and generally low-achieving students, the study provides some important cautions about online credit recovery," said Jessica Heppen, a managing researcher at AIR and the study's lead author, in a prepared statement. "While many online credit recovery programs are touted for their effectiveness, the evidence for different types of models, particularly those in wide use, is lacking."

The study, "Back on Track," was funded with a grant from the United States Department of Education's Institute of Education Sciences. The results were shared at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association in Washington, D.C. A longer article on the study will soon appear in the Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness.

The research brief, "Getting Back on Track: Comparing the Effects of Online and Face-to-Face Credit Recovery in Algebra I," is available on the AIR website.

An additional paper released by the project studied the role of class mentors in online credit recovery. "Getting Back on Track: The Role of In-Person Instructional Support for Students Taking Online Credit Recovery," offered three key findings:

  • Roughly 40 percent of the online classes studied in the project had "in-class" mentors to provide extra instructional support, which was defined as spending at least 12 hours of the 60-hour program answering students' questions about math;
  • Those instructors deemed as "instructionally supportive" were more likely to be certified math teachers; and
  • Although students with instructionally supportive mentors took fewer tests in the online course, they were "slightly" more successful on the tests they took. They also had higher credit recovery rates than the students with less instructional support from mentors.

Featured

  • Case Systems makerspace

    Case Systems Launches Line of K–12 Makerspace Installations

    Case Systems recently announced the launch of SALTO, a line of classroom fixtures and installations for K–12 learning spaces like STEM labs, art rooms, and makerspaces. The product line is designed to provide teachers with flexibility and adaptability, enabling them to shift between collaborative and individual learning environments.

  • Two professionals, one male and one female, discuss AI regulations in a modern office with holographic displays showing legal documents, balance scales, and neural network symbols.

    Congress Releases Recommendations for AI Governance

    The bipartisan House Task Force on Artificial Intelligence recently released a report with recommendations to bolster American leadership in AI.

  • computer with a red warning icon on its screen, surrounded by digital grids, glowing neural network patterns, and a holographic brain

    Report Highlights Security Concerns of Open Source AI

    In these days of rampant ransomware and other cybersecurity exploits, security is paramount to both proprietary and open source AI approaches — and here the open source movement might be susceptible to some inherent drawbacks, such as use of possibly insecure code from unknown sources.

  • outline of a modern school building as glowing blue geometric shapes, surrounded by binary code streams, with golden orbs and lines representing funding, set against a dark gray gradient with faint grid patterns

    FCC Cybersecurity Pilot Participants Selected

    The Federal Communications Commission has officially selected the participants for its Schools and Libraries Cybersecurity Pilot, the three-year program exploring the use of Universal Service funds to improve school and library defenses against cyber attacks.