Common Core, Obamacare and the Numbers Game

With field tests underway, will CCSS reach the same tipping point that the Affordable Care Act has?

Christopher Piehler

The Common Core State Standards and the Affordable Care Act have a few big things in common. They are both enormous social initiatives that began with noble goals. (Despite the current hyperpartisan political climate, I think we can all agree that developing 21st century educational standards for our public schools is a good idea, as is improving access to healthcare.) 

Both CCSS and the ACA have, of course, faced political opposition. Many of the ACA’s most vocal critics have called it an intrusion of federal power into a state-level issue. I believe this reaction helped create some of the opposition to Common Core, which is based on the misconception that the standards are a federal initiative. This backlash led to Indiana’s recent withdrawal from the standards. 

Both CCSS and the ACA have also been hampered by rocky rollouts. The troubles with the healthcare.gov website have been covered exhaustively, and the Common Core assessments have had their share of troubles, including opposition from parents and teachers, postponed field tests and states switching assessment providers. In fact, American Federation of Teachers President Randi Weingarten was quoted as saying, “You think the Obamacare implementation is bad? The implementation of the Common Core is far worse.” 

Despite its troubles, the ACA reached a tipping point at the end of March. With more than 7 million people signed up for health insurance through the exchanges, the law now has millions of citizens on its side, not to mention a deep-pocketed healthcare industry that is welcoming all those new customers. 

Common Core (which has its own powerful allies in the business world) also reached an important milestone at the end of March, by which point PARCC and Smarter Balanced had administered hundreds of thousands of field tests of the new assessments. The assessments certainly face more obstacles on the road to implementation next spring, but as more educators get comfortable with them, Common Core is looking like it, too, will win the numbers game.

About the Author

Christopher Piehler is the former editor-in-chief of THE Journal.

Featured

  • horizontal stack of U.S. dollar bills breaking in half

    ED Abruptly Cancels ESSER Funding Extensions

    The Department of Education has moved to close the door on COVID relief funding for schools, declaring that "extending deadlines for COVID-related grants, which are in fact taxpayer funds, years after the COVID pandemic ended is not consistent with the Department’s priorities and thus not a worthwhile exercise of its discretion."

  • illustration of a human head with a glowing neural network in the brain, connected to tech icons on a cool blue-gray background

    Meta Introduces Stand-Alone AI App

    Meta Platforms has launched a stand-alone artificial intelligence app built on its proprietary Llama 4 model, intensifying the competitive race in generative AI alongside OpenAI, Google, Anthropic, and xAI.

  • The AI Show

    Register for Free to Attend the World's Greatest Show for All Things AI in EDU

    The AI Show @ ASU+GSV, held April 5–7, 2025, at the San Diego Convention Center, is a free event designed to help educators, students, and parents navigate AI's role in education. Featuring hands-on workshops, AI-powered networking, live demos from 125+ EdTech exhibitors, and keynote speakers like Colin Kaepernick and Stevie Van Zandt, the event offers practical insights into AI-driven teaching, learning, and career opportunities. Attendees will gain actionable strategies to integrate AI into classrooms while exploring innovations that promote equity, accessibility, and student success.

  • robot waving

    Copilot Updates Aim to Personalize AI

    Microsoft has introduced a range of updates to its Copilot platform, marking a new phase in its effort to deliver what it calls a "true AI companion" that adapts to individual users' needs, preferences and routines.