Report: Teachers Want Metadata Tags on Resources, Don't Know if They've Used Tagged Material

Nearly six in 10 education publishers currently describe or tag their material with metadata, and 56 percent of those who don't have plans to begin doing so within the next year, according to a recent survey by the Learning Resources Metadata Initiative (LRMI).

The advantage of tagging resources with metadata most commonly cited by educators who responded to the survey was more productive searches, at 60 percent. Access to resources they did not previously know about and faster searches came in second and third, at 36 percent each.

Other key findings of the LRMI Survey Report include:

  • 83.8 percent of educators and 72 percent of publishers surveyed said that content or subject area is the most helpful search criteria;
  • Grade level was the second most helpful search criteria according to both educators and publishers, at rates of 71 and 56 percent, respectively;
  • Resource type (60 percent), standards alignment (57 percent) and intended user (56 percent) rounded out the top five most helpful search criteria, according to survey respondents;
  • Search results with incorrectly or inappropriately tagged resources was the most common worry educators told researchers they had, at 60 percent;
  • A lack of training about searching for tagged resources and restrictive searches that don't turn up untagged resources were the second and third most commonly cited concerns, at 55 and 54 percent, respectively;
  • Nearly two-thirds, 64 percent, of educators surveyed said they were unaware if resources they had used recently were tagged or not. Seventeen percent said recently used resources were tagged and 19 percent said they were not;
  • Sixty-six percent of surveyed educators said publishers should tag their resources and 78 percent said they should say they do in promotional materials;
  • Google was far and away the most popular search environment educators reported using to find educational resources at 96 percent. That rate was down, however, from 98.8 percent in the 2013 survey;
  • Educators indicated that the Library of Congress was the second most commonly used search environment at 49 percent, and publishers' sites were a close third at 487 percent; and
  • Eighty-four percent of educators who responded said that adding standard educational search criteria to search engines like Google, Bing or Yahoo would improve their satisfaction with search results.

To see the full report, with interviews of educators and findings of the publisher survey, visit lrmi.net.

About the Author

Joshua Bolkan is contributing editor for Campus Technology, THE Journal and STEAM Universe. He can be reached at [email protected].

Featured

  • AI toolbox containing a wrench, document icon, gears, and a network symbol

    Common Sense Media Releases Free AI Toolkit, AI Readiness & Implementation Guides

    Common Sense Media has developed an AI Toolkit for School Districts, available to educators free of charge, that provides guidelines and resources for implementing AI in education.

  • elementary school building with children outside, overlaid by a glowing data network and transparent graphs

    Toward a Holistic Approach to Data-Informed Decision-Making in Education

    With increasing access to data and powerful analytic tools, the temptation to reduce educational outcomes to mere numbers is strong. However, educational leadership demands a more holistic and thoughtful approach.

  • three silhouetted education technology leaders with thought bubbles containing AI-related icons

    Ed Tech Leaders Rank Generative AI as Top Tech Priority

    In a recent CoSN survey, an overwhelming majority of ed tech leaders (94%) said they see AI as having a positive impact on education. Respondents ranked generative AI as their top tech priority, with 80% reporting their districts have gen AI initiatives underway, or plan to in the current school year.

  • AI-powered individual working calmly on one side and a burnt-out person slumped over a laptop on the other

    AI's Productivity Gains Come at a Cost

    A recent academic study found that as companies adopt AI tools, they're not just streamlining workflows — they're piling on new demands. Researchers determined that "AI technostress" is driving burnout and disrupting personal lives, even as organizations hail productivity gains.