Eighth Grade Girls Score Higher than Boys in Tech and Engineering on Newest NAEP Test

On the first national assessment of students’ technology and engineering abilities, eighth grade girls scored three points higher on average than eighth grade boys.

Students who were eligible for the National School Lunch Program (NSLP) scored 28 points lower than students who were not eligible for NSLP.

Those who lived in suburbs, towns and rural areas scored better than those who lived in cities.

And, not surprisingly, students whose parents graduated from college scored higher than students whose parents did not finish high school.

These were some of the findings in the first brand-new test in a decade from the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), also known as “the nation’s report card.” The Technology and Engineering Literacy exam (TEL) was administered between January 2014 and March 2014. Approximately 21,500 eighth grade students from 840 schools across the nation participated in the exam.

The National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), a federal agency under the U.S. Department of Education, administers the NAEP. This tech and engineering exam was the first completely digital assessment of the NAEP. NCES plans to administer all of its tests digitally by 2017.

In a prepared statement, Peggy Carr, acting commissioner of the NCES, said the results may  indicate that “girls are better able to understand and evaluate technology and then use it to solve problems and achieve goals.”

However, across both sexes, socioeconomic factors were clearly important in the results, as were disabilities and whether English was a first or second language.  

Here are some other findings in the TEL:

  • White students scored significantly better in tech and engineering than black and Hispanic students. White students had an overall TEL score of 160, versus 128 for black students and 138 for Hispanic students.

  • There were no major differences in scores between white and Asian students. In fact, Asian students scored four points better than whites in the subcategory of “information and communication technology.”

  • Students with disabilities scored 39 points lower than students without disabilities.

  • Students who identified as English language learners (ELL) scored 44 points lower than students who were not ELL.

  • Eighty-seven percent reported figuring out why something was not working in order to fix it outside of school work.

  • Fifty percent reported using a computer to create, edit or organize digital media at least once a month in school.

Data tables summarizing the TEL results are freely available for download on the NAEP website.

About the Author

Richard Chang is associate editor of THE Journal. He can be reached at [email protected].

Featured

  • abstract agentic ai data streams

    Rubrik Brings Agentic AI to Its Flagship Cyber Resilience Platform

    Rubrik has introduced Rubrik AI, positioning the company's cyber resilience platform around agentic operations across data, identity, and AI infrastructure.

  • Futuristic glowing digital book

    AI Won't Replace Teachers — But It May Be What Makes Structured Literacy Work at Scale

    Purpose-built AI systems can analyze patterns in student performance, identify specific skill gaps, and connect those gaps directly to instructional recommendations. Done well, this doesn't remove the teacher from the equation. It sharpens the teacher's ability to act.

  • tool icons with variety of business icons

    SETDA Releases Free EdTech Quality Action Toolkit

    The State Educational Technology Directors Association (SETDA) has put together a free K-12 EdTech Quality Action Toolkit that provides a framework for evaluating education technology products as well as guidance on regulatory compliance, templates for communicating with vendors, training resources, and more.

  • circuit patterns

    Anthropic Intros Lower-Cost Claude Sonnet 5

    Anthropic has launched Claude Sonnet 5, positioning the model as its most autonomous mid-tier offering to date and a lower-cost alternative to its flagship Opus 4.8 system. The company said the model can plan multi-step tasks, operate tools such as browsers and terminals, and complete agentic work at a level that previously required larger and more expensive models.