Device Access Impacts Student Achievement

The U.S. Department of Education's National Assessment of Educational Progress takes a look at how students and teachers are using computers for learning.

Device Access Impacts Student Achievement 

In 2015, most students reported that they had access to a computer at home or in school, but those without access scored lower on the United States Department of Education's National Assessment of Educational Progress math and reading assessments.  This finding comes from the NAEP's 2015 math and reading assessment survey results that were published Sept. 17.

The NAEP is a continuing and nationally representative measure of academic trends in education conducted by the Department of Education through surveys. 

  • A range between 9 percent and 14 percent of students in grades 4 and 8 who took the math assessment and between 11 percent and 12 percent of students in grades 4 and 8 who took the reading assessment had no access to computers in school.
  • Students with access to computers at home range ranged from 74 percent to 94 percent at grade 4 and 77 percent to 97 percent at grade in the mathematics assessment across states and jurisdictions.
  • Among students under the National School Lunch Program, 76 percent of students had access to computers at home, and 91 percent had computer access in school. In comparison, 91 percent of students not eligible for NSLP had access to computers at home, and 92 percent had access in school.
  • When looking at schools by type, 94 percent of students at Catholic schools had computer access in the home compared to 83 percent of public schools and 86 percent of charter schools.

When it comes to using computers in the classroom, the survey found about 25 percent of fourth- and eighth-grade public school students reported that they used computers every day or almost every day in their math or reading classroom learning. The survey also found that classrooms using computers once or twice a week has risen 5 percentage points in math and 6 percentage points in reading classes since 2013.

The full results of the 2015 NAEP survey can be found here.

About the Author

Sara Friedman is a reporter/producer for Campus Technology, THE Journal and STEAM Universe covering education policy and a wide range of other public-sector IT topics.

Friedman is a graduate of Ithaca College, where she studied journalism, politics and international communications.

Friedman can be contacted at [email protected] or follow her on Twitter @SaraEFriedman.

Click here for previous articles by Friedman.


Featured

  • Abstract glowing network nodes forming conversation bubbles

    OpenAI Intros Dots, AI Agents that Continue Working Between User Conversations

    OpenAI has introduced Dots, GPT-6 Astra-powered agents that run on their own cloud computers, using connected applications to carry on with assignments between conversations and incorporating users' feedback as they go.

  • Class CrunchLabs YouTube channel

    Mark Rober's Class CrunchLabs Courses Now Available for Free on YouTube

    Class CrunchLabs, the suite of free curriculum resources from NASA engineer turned YouTube science communicator Mark Rober, has released its first two courses on YouTube.

  • education funding and graduation symbols on wooden dice

    What Is the Education Freedom Tax Credit and How Will It Work?

    The federal Education Freedom Tax Credit (EFTC) is a new source of funding for education that could benefit 90% of students in states that have opted in to the program. However, some confusion and misconceptions exist surrounding details of the program, including which programs may qualify, how parents can apply for scholarships, and how public school students can benefit.

  • circuit patterns

    Anthropic Intros Lower-Cost Claude Sonnet 5

    Anthropic has launched Claude Sonnet 5, positioning the model as its most autonomous mid-tier offering to date and a lower-cost alternative to its flagship Opus 4.8 system. The company said the model can plan multi-step tasks, operate tools such as browsers and terminals, and complete agentic work at a level that previously required larger and more expensive models.