Brief Proposes Alternatives to Seat Time as a Measure of Student Learning

  • By Dian Schaffhauser
  • 11/30/20

Is "seat time" really the optimal way to measure attendance during a pandemic? There are better alternatives, according to a new brief from the Aurora Institute (formerly iNACOL). The nonprofit advocates for "breakthrough policies" in K-12 education, including promoting competency-based education, which promotes a shift away from classroom time as an indicator of academic growth and towards showing mastery of concepts as a replacement.

In "Determining Attendance and Alternatives to Seat-Time," the authors have proposed that districts take advantage of COVID-19 to revisit "old-fangled" policies regarding attendance. Instead of measuring attendance based on the number of hours students spend "in" the classroom, which has no meaning when school is delivered remotely, they could be using alternatives such as:

  • Time on task;

  • Participation;

  • Evidence of student work; and

  • Demonstrations of improved skills, competencies and knowledge.

The key to success will probably start at the state level, however, since attendance policies are often locked into place by law.

As the report noted, "Developing simple counts of student attendance during COVID-19 school closures may be less educationally meaningful than investing in strategies that boost student motivation, thereby increasing engagement." One way to boost student engagement, the authors suggested, is to have advisors (not just teachers but staff as well) call every student daily to check in on academic progress and find out how he or she is doing otherwise.

The brief has profiled 10 approaches for creating attendance policies in as many states. Oregon law, as an example, lets districts allow students to show mastery in several ways (completing classroom work, passing an exam, providing a portfolio of work showing proficiency or providing documentation of learning activities and experiences that show proficiency). New York law uses similar techniques as well as student participation in online forums or phone calls.

The eight-page brief is openly available on the Aurora Institute website.

About the Author

Dian Schaffhauser is a former senior contributing editor for 1105 Media's education publications THE Journal, Campus Technology and Spaces4Learning.

Featured

  • AI-powered individual working calmly on one side and a burnt-out person slumped over a laptop on the other

    AI's Productivity Gains Come at a Cost

    A recent academic study found that as companies adopt AI tools, they're not just streamlining workflows — they're piling on new demands. Researchers determined that "AI technostress" is driving burnout and disrupting personal lives, even as organizations hail productivity gains.

  • three silhouetted education technology leaders with thought bubbles containing AI-related icons

    Ed Tech Leaders Rank Generative AI as Top Tech Priority

    In a recent CoSN survey, an overwhelming majority of ed tech leaders (94%) said they see AI as having a positive impact on education. Respondents ranked generative AI as their top tech priority, with 80% reporting their districts have gen AI initiatives underway, or plan to in the current school year.

  • blue AI cloud connected to circuit lines, a server stack, and a shield with a padlock icon

    Report: AI Security Controls Lag Behind Adoption of AI Cloud Services

    According to a recent report from cybersecurity firm Wiz, nearly nine out of 10 organizations are already using AI services in the cloud — but fewer than one in seven have implemented AI-specific security controls.

  • lightbulb

    Call for Speakers Now Open for Tech Tactics in Education: Overcoming Roadblocks to Innovation

    The annual virtual conference from the producers of Campus Technology and THE Journal will return on Sept. 25, 2025, with a focus on emerging trends in cybersecurity, data privacy, AI implementation, IT leadership, building resilience, and more.