Do Corporate Philanthropists Have a Seat at the Education Policy Table? Duncan: 'Nothing Could Be Further from the Truth'

Is there a corporate agenda in the United States Department of Education? According to Education Secretary Arne Duncan, no.

Duncan sat down with two teaching ambassador fellows at the U.S. Department of Education to answer questions about corporate influence in education policy. When asked whether corporate philanthropists like the Gates Foundation are playing "too heavy a role in public education," Duncan replied that these organizations don't even have a seat at the policy table.

"Anyone who thinks that those who are major donors to education or those giving a lot have a seat at the table in terms of policymaking, nothing could be further from the truth," Duncan said.

He continued: "We try and listen to everyone so where folks are investing, whether it's foundations, whether it's corporations, whether it's nonprofits coming in and helping schools, faith-based organizations, we want everyone rallying behind the effort."

Critics, including individual teachers and education advocates, as well as education organizations, have railed against the "corporatization" of education in general, and corporate influence on major initiatives like Common Core State Standards in particular.

Duncan, however, said that philanthropists like Bill Gates and Eli Broad have an important role to play in education.

"I have tremendus respect for them and am thrilled that, given lots of other places they could choose to put their dollars, the fact that they're trying to help education, I think it's a very positive thing. But no, it doesn't get them a seat at the table.... But again, having people in philanthropy who've ben successful come back and give back and help be part of the solution, I think that's really important."

The dialog was posted today on ed.gov, with a video of the interview hosted on YouTube. YouTube comments on the video have been disabled, but the hashtag #askarne is being used to continue the conversation on Twitter.

 

About the Author

David Nagel is the former editorial director of 1105 Media's Education Group and editor-in-chief of THE Journal, STEAM Universe, and Spaces4Learning. A 30-year publishing veteran, Nagel has led or contributed to dozens of technology, art, marketing, media, and business publications.

He can be reached at [email protected]. You can also connect with him on LinkedIn at https://www.linkedin.com/in/davidrnagel/ .


Featured

  • Two figures, one male and one female, stand beside a transparent digital interface displaying AI symbols like neural networks, code, and a shield, against a clean blue gradient background.

    Microsoft-IDC Report Makes Business Case for Responsible AI

    A report commissioned by Microsoft and published last month by research firm IDC notes that 91% of organizations use AI tech and expect more than a 24% improvement in customer experience, business resilience, sustainability, and operational efficiency due to AI in 2024.

  • group of educators working on computer

    Improve Teacher-Student Satisfaction by Removing Procurement Obstacles

    Intuitive tools help teachers gain flexibility and control over purchases, and more time back for doing what they love.

  • abstract geometric pattern of glowing interconnected triangles, hexagons, and circles in blue, gold, and white, spread across a dark navy-to-black gradient background

    OpenAI Introduces 'Operator' AI for Performing Web Tasks

    OpenAI has announced "Operator," an AI agent designed to perform web-based tasks autonomously using its own browser. Currently available as a research preview for Pro users in the United States, the tool aims to automate everyday activities such as filling out forms, ordering groceries, and even creating memes.

  • horizontal stack of U.S. dollar bills breaking in half

    ED Abruptly Cancels ESSER Funding Extensions

    The Department of Education has moved to close the door on COVID relief funding for schools, declaring that "extending deadlines for COVID-related grants, which are in fact taxpayer funds, years after the COVID pandemic ended is not consistent with the Department’s priorities and thus not a worthwhile exercise of its discretion."