Who Can Best Assess the New Assessments?

A recent study reveals that most students understand the need for testing and prefer to do it on a computer — but their parents still have issues.

Christopher Piehler

With districts in the 44 Common Core states field-testing new online assessments, plenty of critics have voiced their opinions. The most extreme are exhuming the twin bogeymen of Communism and Nazism to attack the standards themselves, while moderate opponents have shown reasonable concern about the impact of testing on teaching and learning.

A recent study brings a much-needed constituency to the conversation: students. The Northwest Evaluation Association’s “Make Assessment Matter: Students and Educators Want Tests that Support Learning” surveyed 1,042 students, 94 percent of whom agree that tests are “important for understanding what they are learning, getting into a good college and knowing whether they will move on to the next grade.”

You can read more about the study here, but I think one more number merits mention: 78 percent of the students surveyed believe that taking tests on computers has a positive impact on their engagement during these assessments.

So in this sample, large majorities of students understand the purpose of the new tests and prefer to take them on computers — yet I still hear a steady chorus of parents who are unhappy about the impact of assessments on their kids. For example, I recently read the following on a college friend’s Facebook feed: “I had a child come out of standardized testing crying today because he thought he got his teacher in trouble with his score. Just UGH.”

I understand this. No mother wants her child to come home from school in tears. Fortunately, though, that was not the end of the story. Later, my friend posted this: “We e-mailed his teacher and she is being super and understanding — this all has to do with how he interpreted something she said about growth targets in response to another student’s question about it…. I feel almost as bad for her as I do for him. This isn’t good for anyone, but we’ll get through it.” 

Clearly my friend was not converted into a pro-assessment evangelist, but her comments were a good reminder that the key to this transition is not the technology or the cacophony of opinion; it is engaged parents and responsive teachers working together to do their best for students.

About the Author

Christopher Piehler is the former editor-in-chief of THE Journal.

Featured

  • abstract pattern of cybersecurity, ai and cloud imagery

    Report Identifies Malicious Use of AI in Cloud-Based Cyber Threats

    A recent report from OpenAI identifies the misuse of artificial intelligence in cybercrime, social engineering, and influence operations, particularly those targeting or operating through cloud infrastructure. In "Disrupting Malicious Uses of AI: June 2025," the company outlines how threat actors are weaponizing large language models for malicious ends — and how OpenAI is pushing back.

  • glowing shield hovers above a digital cloud platform with abstract data streams and cloud icons in the background

    Google to Acquire Cloud Security Firm Wiz in $32 Billion Deal

    Google has announced it will acquire cloud security startup Wiz for $32 billion. If completed, the acquisition — an all-cash deal — would mark the largest in Google's history.

  • group of educators working on computer

    Improve Teacher-Student Satisfaction by Removing Procurement Obstacles

    Intuitive tools help teachers gain flexibility and control over purchases, and more time back for doing what they love.

  • horizontal stack of U.S. dollar bills breaking in half

    ED Abruptly Cancels ESSER Funding Extensions

    The Department of Education has moved to close the door on COVID relief funding for schools, declaring that "extending deadlines for COVID-related grants, which are in fact taxpayer funds, years after the COVID pandemic ended is not consistent with the Department’s priorities and thus not a worthwhile exercise of its discretion."