LA Unified Promotes CS Education; Conflicted on 1-to-1 Devices

At the same time that Los Angeles Unified School District voted to promote computer science education and reduce the "digital divide," the country's largest school system also is trying to bring back 1-to-1 computing devices in a big way almost four years after it canceled its last major attempt. However, the latest effort has hit a funding obstacle.

Last month LA's board of education passed a resolution affirming its commitment to increasing student access to digital tools and media, along with promoting instruction on safe and responsible technology usage and providing access to CS courses for all students.

"When I visit schools across my district, the number one request principals make is for more digital access," said Board Member Ref Rodriguez in a prepared statement. "Because our educators know that their students' potential is impaired without it. As part of the district's efforts to achieve digital equity, I am confident that we will continue to integrate technology thoughtfully into quality instruction, in service of our greater goals of improved graduation rates and student success beyond their time in the L.A. Unified system."

The latest decision was begun in April 2015, when the district convened a task force to develop a district-wide vision for instructional technology. That was less than a year after the district had canceled its infamous multi-million-dollar contracts with Apple and Pearson, which promised to put an iPad and software into the hands of every student. The task force work resulted in a set of recommendations founded on International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) standards to support the preparation of 21st century "learners and leaders." By June 2016, the board had adopted the ISTE standards, which address the "essential conditions" necessary for "systems readiness."

The new plan was to allocate $150 million of bond funding to "upgrade and equip schools with 21st century technology" as part of an "empowered learner program." This time around, the devices would be varied and less expensive than the iPads in the initial program and the district would contract with multiple software companies for digital resources.

However, device plans have run into a hurdle among some school officials. While a district bond oversite committee approved funding related to school technology infrastructure and system upgrades, it unanimously rejected the device proposal at the end of May 2018. While the education board can overrule the committee's decision, the previous debacle may still be "too fresh," as one news program put it.

About the Author

Dian Schaffhauser is a former senior contributing editor for 1105 Media's education publications THE Journal, Campus Technology and Spaces4Learning.

Featured

  • digital graph

    Building Genuinely Data-Informed School Districts

    Schools today generate enormous amounts of data. The difference between collecting it and using it effectively often comes down to quality, access, and context.

  • Neon blue security locks with a single red highlight

    With AI, Cybersecurity Focus Shifts from Finding Flaws to Fixing Them

    For decades, one of cybersecurity's biggest challenges has been finding vulnerabilities before attackers do. A growing number of security professionals now say artificial intelligence is changing that equation, shifting the focus from discovering flaws to fixing them quickly enough to prevent exploitation.

  • Top View Shot in Elementary School Computer Science Classroom

    Education's Top 5 Technology Priorities and the Challenges Standing in the Way

    Cybersecurity ranks as the No. 1 priority for education technology leaders in the United States, according to the latest State of Ed Tech report from CoSN, yet insufficient cybersecurity staffing and the lack of a dedicated budget are key barriers.

  • Engineering team implements digital guardrails on AI

    3 Starting Points for Integrating AI Guardrails in K-12 Districts

    As education leaders start to craft an AI policy that is both practical and flexible enough to evolve with this fast-changing technology, there is at least one principle that should be foundational: AI should serve to augment human critical thinking and creativity but never replace human interaction and decision-making.