Apple Found Guilty of E-Book Price Fixing

A federal judge at the Southern District of New York court has found Apple guilty of violating United States antitrust laws and colluding with five book publishing companies to inflate e-book prices. The three-week trial concluded June 20, and the judge issued the ruling July 9. The tech giant plans to appeal.

In a civil antitrust lawsuit, the U.S. Department of Justice claimed that in January 2010 Apple and five publishers entered an agency-model agreement, in which publishers, not retailers, set the price of e-books. The publishers agreed to set higher prices for bestsellers and new releases, resulting in a price increase from $9.99 to $12.99 and $14.99. As part of the agreement, which preceded Apple's entry into the e-book market with the launch of the iPad in April 2010, Apple received a 30 percent commission on each e-book sold and required publishers to match competitors' prices if they were lower. Because market-dominating Amazon sold e-books for $9.99, publishers began withholding some bestsellers from Amazon for a period of time after the release date.

“Understanding that no one Publisher could risk acting alone in an attempt to take pricing power away from Amazon, Apple created a mechanism and environment that enabled them to act together in a matter of weeks to eliminate all retail price competition for their e-books,” wrote U.S. District Judge Denise Cote, in a 160-page ruling. "The evidence is overwhelming that Apple knew of the unlawful aims of the conspiracy and joined that conspiracy with the specific intent to help it succeed."

The Justice Department initially sued Apple and five of the country's largest publishing companies: Hachette, HarperCollins, Macmillan, Penguin, and Simon & Schuster. Only Apple proceeded to trial, while the publishers settled with the Department of Justice and agreed to pay more than $166 million combined.

The Department of Justice may now seek injunctive relief, which could prevent Apple from using the agency business model to sell e-books for a two-year period and impose other requirements to prevent the company from skewing the e-book market in its favor.

Because Apple was found guilty of violating U.S. antitrust laws, 33 state attorneys general will now take the company to trial to recover money on behalf of consumers who paid higher prices for e-books.

Apple settled a separate e-book pricing antitrust case with the European Commission last year but didn't admit to any wrongdoing.

About the Author

Leila Meyer is a technology writer based in British Columbia. She can be reached at [email protected].

Featured

  • digital lock with circuit patterns

    IBM Adds New AI-Powered Cybersecurity Tools

    IBM has unveiled an expanded portfolio of AI-powered cybersecurity products, positioning the company to compete more aggressively in a rapidly evolving market where enterprises are increasingly turning to artificial intelligence to defend against automated cyber threats.

  • large cloud icon with abstract code  and interconnected polygons

    Report: Enterprise AI Workloads Are Tipping Toward Private Cloud

    Broadcom's 2026 Private Coud Outlook report says enterprise AI is moving from experimentation into production, with private cloud emerging as the preferred deployment environment for AI inference among surveyed organizations.

  • businessman holding tablet with holographic AI icons

    Google Moving AI Agents into Mainstream Product Portfolio

    At its recent I/O developer conference, Google positioned artificial intelligence agents not as a distant research project, but as a product strategy spanning Search, personal assistants, productivity software, developer tools, and smart glasses.

  • Wi-Fi icon on dark blue circuit background

    FCC to Conduct 'Top-to-Bottom' Review of E-Rate Program

    The FCC is laying the groundwork for a comprehensive review of its E-Rate program, the federal initiative that provides K–12 schools and public libraries with discounts on internet, WiFi, and telecommunications services to ensure equitable digital access.