Report: Florida Textbooks not Aligned to Common Core

In a draft paper, Morgan Polikoff, an assistant professor in the University of Southern California's Rossier School of Education, analyzed several math textbooks currently in use in fourth grade classrooms in Florida and found them misaligned to the Common Core State Standards (CCSS).

In his most stringent analysis, Polikoff found that only "27 percent to 38 percent of the textbooks' content is in perfect proportional agreement with the CCSS." Using a less rigorous definition of alignment that uses the standards as a reference and does not require proportional agreement, Polikoff found that between 63 percent and 79 percent of textbook content was aligned to the standards.

When flipping the analysis so that the textbooks were the reference, Polikoff found similar numbers, ranging from 70-76 percent alignment, though when ranking the textbooks this way, the order "is nearly the opposite of the rank ordering on the previously mentioned indices," wrote Polikoff in the paper. "That is, textbooks in which a larger proportion of the content comes from the standards are not necessarily the textbooks that cover the largest proportion of standards content."

In looking for the source of the misalignment, Polikoff found that the texts were approximately evenly split in misaligned topics and misaligned cognitive demand.

"The cognitive demand analysis indicates that each of the three CCSS-aligned textbooks and Saxon emphasizes memorization and procedures overwhelmingly," wrote Polikoff, with those categories representing between 88 and 93 percent of total content though the CCSS calls for just 60 percent of content to focus on those processes.

Conversely, although "almost one-third of the standards content calls for students to demonstrate understanding, just 7 percent to 12 percent of the textbooks' content is at this level," wrote Polikoff, and there is "essentially zero" content focused on the two top levels of cognitive demand despite their 11 percent representation in the standards.

Polikoff analyzed seven math textbooks designed for fourth-grade classrooms that are currently in use in Florida. Three of the textbooks analyzed are "Common-Core aligned," three were earlier versions of those books and the seventh is not specifically aligned with any standards. Florida was chosen because it is one of the only states that collects textbook adoption data by district and because it's "a statewide textbook adoption state and a large state that likely influences the content in textbooks nationwide," according to the paper.

To read the full draft paper visit bcf.usc.edu.

About the Author

Joshua Bolkan is contributing editor for Campus Technology, THE Journal and STEAM Universe. He can be reached at [email protected].

Featured

  • digital graph

    Building Genuinely Data-Informed School Districts

    Schools today generate enormous amounts of data. The difference between collecting it and using it effectively often comes down to quality, access, and context.

  • Neon blue security locks with a single red highlight

    With AI, Cybersecurity Focus Shifts from Finding Flaws to Fixing Them

    For decades, one of cybersecurity's biggest challenges has been finding vulnerabilities before attackers do. A growing number of security professionals now say artificial intelligence is changing that equation, shifting the focus from discovering flaws to fixing them quickly enough to prevent exploitation.

  • Top View Shot in Elementary School Computer Science Classroom

    Education's Top 5 Technology Priorities and the Challenges Standing in the Way

    Cybersecurity ranks as the No. 1 priority for education technology leaders in the United States, according to the latest State of Ed Tech report from CoSN, yet insufficient cybersecurity staffing and the lack of a dedicated budget are key barriers.

  • Engineering team implements digital guardrails on AI

    3 Starting Points for Integrating AI Guardrails in K-12 Districts

    As education leaders start to craft an AI policy that is both practical and flexible enough to evolve with this fast-changing technology, there is at least one principle that should be foundational: AI should serve to augment human critical thinking and creativity but never replace human interaction and decision-making.