Achieve Gives Guidance to States on Developing Well Rounded Science Assessments

As states sort out their science standards — many adopting the Next Generation Science Standards and even more going at the work on their own — all of them are expected to adhere to "high-quality" summative science assessments that meet federal requirements spelled out in Title 1 Part A of the Every Student Succeeds Act.

Achieve, one of the organizations behind the development of NGSS, recently released criteria that can be used by states to develop those grade-level tests and know that they meet federal expectations. Finding success, a new report advised, will require becoming sticklers in three areas:

  • Using "intentional design": making sure not just that the assessment items mesh with the standards but also that they meet the priorities set by the individual state, that decision-making can be backed up by evidence and that the items are accessible to all students, among other aspects.
  • Supporting design decisions and rationales through evidence: In other words, documentation of the assessment development process to make decisions and rationale "explicit and transparent."
  • Reflecting more comprehensive learning goals: It's no longer sufficient to include one test question per learning standard; tasks may touch on all or parts of multiple standards, requiring reconsideration of "content centrality and complexity."

Achieve's new document is intended to be used by educators and assessment experts as they develop or evaluate their statewide summative assessments against their science standards. It was developed with input from the writers of the National Research Council's A Framework for K-12 Science Education and the NGSS.

The guidance is grounded in three elements: an "evolving understanding of how best to assess multi-dimensional standards"; the research that lays out what all students should know and be able to do in science; and the lessons learned through the processes undertaken by pioneering states as they developed their "three-dimensional assessments."

The criteria document is openly available on Achieve's website. Access to the organization's other supports for its science standards are on the NGSS website.

About the Author

Dian Schaffhauser is a former senior contributing editor for 1105 Media's education publications THE Journal, Campus Technology and Spaces4Learning.

Featured

  • tool icons with variety of business icons

    SETDA Releases Free EdTech Quality Action Toolkit

    The State Educational Technology Directors Association (SETDA) has put together a free K-12 EdTech Quality Action Toolkit that provides a framework for evaluating education technology products as well as guidance on regulatory compliance, templates for communicating with vendors, training resources, and more.

  • cyber security padlock

    Report: AI Adoption Forces Trade-Off Between Speed and Identity Security

    AI adoption is forcing enterprises to trade security for speed — and identity controls are the first casualty, according to a new report from Delinea, a provider of identity security solutions for both human and AI agent identities.

  • Neon blue security locks with a single red highlight

    With AI, Cybersecurity Focus Shifts from Finding Flaws to Fixing Them

    For decades, one of cybersecurity's biggest challenges has been finding vulnerabilities before attackers do. A growing number of security professionals now say artificial intelligence is changing that equation, shifting the focus from discovering flaws to fixing them quickly enough to prevent exploitation.

  • abstract data flow

    Google Announces New Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform

    Google Cloud has introduced a new platform for building and managing enterprise AI agents, as the company seeks to turn its Gemini models and Vertex AI tooling into a broader system for automating business workflows.