BYOD | Viewpoint

7 Myths About BYOD Debunked

Lisa Nielsen, the author of "Teaching Generation Text: Using Cell Phones to Enhance Learning" and "The Innovative Educator" blog, believes it is time to shatter a few myths about students bringing their own devices (BYOD) to school.

More than a decade into the 21st century and we are still keeping learners and teachers prisoners of the analog past by enforcing outdated mandates that ban and block them from using the digital resources of their world.

Fortunately, today’s students are standing up, speaking out, and, in many cases, using the technology and websites they do not have access to in school to do so. It’s time to listen to the students (and many of their parents and teachers) and shed light on misconceptions by dispelling common myths about bringing your own device (BYOD) to school. When we do, we can begin to move past the ignorance and toward breaking the ban.

Myth No. 1: BYOD deepens the digital divide.
The digital divide exists whether we allow students to bring the devices they own to school or not. It is illogical to prohibit those students who have devices from using them in a desire to achieve a sense of equity rather than to provide devices for those who need them. Tim Clark, district instructional technology specialist with Forsyth County Schools (GA), explains that in his experience with BYOD, “Students who do not have personal technology devices have greater access to school-owned technology tools when students who bring their own devices to school are no longer competing for that access.”

Myth No. 2: BYOD will result in lessons geared toward the weakest device.
In his blog post, “BYOD--The Worst Idea of the Century?” Gary Stager asserts that BYOD diminishes the otherwise enormous potential of educational computing to the weakest “device” in the room. Teachers who have worked in successful BYOD environments know that Stager is wrong. While teachers may know that cell phones can be used as tools to read a book, write an article, or serve as a free student response system, they may not realize they can be used as tools that enable students to create podcasts or digital books. The shift in a BYOD school is for teachers and students to come together to discuss and discover the limitless possibilities that a tech-rich environment provides, and then work together to think about how to best pursue learning goals.

Myth No. 3: BYOD will cause students to be distracted.
Teachers across the globe are finding that with the right strategies and building blocks in place, learners are much more engaged in connected classrooms. Strategies include incorporating technology into learning plans and updating learning goals to meet the needs of today’s students. Building blocks include working with students to determine responsible use policies, permissions, holding one another accountable for inappropriate use, and having clear consequences in place. Teachers that put the right strategies and building blocks in place report a dramatic decrease in discipline and behavior issues. As students discover how to learn with their devices, they are able to extend their learning beyond the school day and often choose to continue participating in online discussions and collaborative activities for academic purposes. This advantage encourages them to become more self-directed, motivated, and reflective about their learning.

Myth No. 4: Teachers need to become experts in all the technology students own.
Recently, in response to an article describing ways to support students in BYOD, a reader who goes by WAHS SBTS made this comment:  “I am a technology resource teacher. A lot of teachers are very nervous and technology resource teachers a little nervous about being expected to be literate in using a wide variety of platforms we have never even seen. To just say that students are expected to provide their own support is a little naive.”

Clark explains how it works in his district and others. If teachers are introducing an activity with school software or hardware, then they are expected to know how everything works. Because of this learning curve, teachers resort to focusing on one process and one product. When the students bring in their own devices, then they are now the experts on the technology, and they can help each other. The teacher is then able to focus on the educational uses of the technology.

Myth No. 5: BYOD will result in students engaging in dangerous activities.
Our students are living in a digital world with ubiquitous access to technology. Not only is trying to ban kids from connecting digitally a futile effort, it also doesn’t prepare them for the digital world in which they live. “Without BYOD, at the end of each school day, students leave school and immediately turn on their devices and explore the web, often unsupervised,” explains Clark. “By banning devices, we close the door to authentic dialogue of how to use technology appropriately and prevent students from developing strategies for internet safety.”

Instead of banning and blocking, schools need to work with students to create responsible digital citizens and have necessary consequences in place when there are violations, just as is the case in real life. When we address the problem, rather than blame the tools, we move toward creating responsible students.

Myth No. 6: Cell phones are not that powerful, so we should not waste our time with them.
According to the Pew Internet and American Life Project’s February 2010 study, "Teens and Social Media," 74 percent of American teens have a high-speed internet-connected computer at home, but 93 percent of American teens say they go online. That same report states that 41 percent of teens whose family income is less than $30,000 go online using their phones. That number drops to the 20-percent range for higher-income brackets.

Clearly, students are bridging the connectivity divide with portable devices like cell phones and MP3 players. Kids with computers at home are taught how to use them in school. Kids who connect to the internet on phones because they can’t afford computers are not.

Myth No. 7: BYOD will necessitate the standardization of apps and software across all devices.
Students are not widgets and don’t have to use the same tools and do things in the same way. When teachers work with students to understand learning goals, they challenge students with ways to meet them, which enables real learning to take place. Michelle Luhtala, a librarian at New Canaan High School (CT) says teachers at her school are often surprised by which devices kids choose to use and how they use them. She explains that when they let them explore, discover, and create, they meet learning goals in ways that teachers and administrators never realized were possible. Students enjoy the opportunity to choose to use their own devices because they have customized them to their personalized needs and interests instead of being standardized.

Schools can no longer be the last place to catch up to the present. While policymakers debate if students deserve the right to learn with the very tools they rely on for success each day, our students are being left unprepared for their futures. It’s time that students, their parents, and educators who know better, rise up and take a stand to ensure our students are armed with the tools they’ll need to succeed in the modern workplace.

So how can schools get started? As the administration, staff, and, hopefully, parents consider BYOD, it is essential that they revisit the vision and core values of their schools and engage their faculty in discussions about how today’s students learn and how the devices they own might support that learning. This should include discussions surrounding sound pedagogy that engages students, fosters creative thinking and problem solving, and honors personal passion. 

Books like "Teaching Generation Text" provide a useful framework for schools with information, easy-to-follow professional development workshops, concrete advice (like its seven building blocks for success and plan to break the ban), and ideas for incorporating student-owned devices into research-based lessons that empower students to learn with their technology. Such resources provide the right support for school leaders, teachers, and parents to partner with students for successful learning outcomes.

Comments

Thu, Apr 5, 2012 Jeff Ostrowick South Africa

Nice article, been debating this with colleagues at work, nice to have well thought out answers to give them.

Tue, Jan 31, 2012 Susie Dundee

We are actually considering moving to one device as we are finding the cost of multi-platform development, support and testing crippling. Are we missing something?

Sun, Jan 8, 2012 Lisa Nielsen New York

@Murray in Canada, I am the author of this piece and would like to debunk another myth regarding my background. I can assure you I have done much more than read a couple articles. I have deployed large-scale implementations in the largest school district in America. I have been a leader in the implementation of school computing technologies for many years as well. Like many of my colleagues, I have seen BYOD work. It is not just for schools that are desperate. I have also seen it work in very wealthy schools and districts. Students should have the freedom to use the technology they own in school just like they do in the real world. If you want to see your dream come alive, please feel free to contact me and I'll set up school visits for you. @Noel Melton, Authors who are experts on issues often write articles. What I share is not just a viewpoint. I share real-world examples of this work successfully occurring in schools around the world. It is not too early to dispel BYOD myths. They are being dispelled in schools everyday.

Wed, Nov 30, 2011 Adam

To facilitate BYOD schools must give students and staff easy but secure access to the school's applications from various devices (including iPads, iPhones, Android devices and Chromebooks), while minimizing the intervention required by IT staff. An ideal solution for such a scenario is Ericom AccessNow, a pure HTML5 RDP client that enables remote users to connect to any RDP host, including Terminal Server (RDS Session Host), physical desktops or VDI virtual desktops – and run their applications and desktops in a browser. AccessNow works natively with Chrome, Safari, Internet Explorer (with Chrome Frame plug-in), Firefox and any other browser with HTML5 and WebSockets support. AccessNow also provides an optional Secure Gateway component enabling external users to securely connect to internal resources using AccessNow, without requiring a VPN. Ericom offers special pricing for education customers. For more info, and to download a demo, visit: http://www.ericom.com/html5_rdp_client.asp?URL_ID=708 Note: I work for Ericom

Thu, Nov 17, 2011 Juan A Garcia Jr Laredo TX

My school used to have a one to one program where each student had a take home laptop. The laptops sadly were abused by some of the students and the district opted to turn the salvageable ones into classroom sets until 4 or so years after the units were out of warranty and under our tech department control and then when the had illuminated their last pixel they were sent to disposal and now teachers struggle trying to schedule lab time from our single computer lab. I think it is time to realize that if our students are to flourish in the smartphone age then districts have to invest in either a one to one program or allow personal digital devices to have students experience content on their own time or in the classroom and BYOD can surely provide some help in that regard

Wed, Nov 16, 2011 Louis

Good article.

Wed, Nov 16, 2011 Murray Canada

Having been a leader in the implementation of school computing technologies for over 12 years I would tell anyone that BYOD is a pipe dream. Most instances of BYOD are examples of teacher's desperate for any technology at all, "anything is better than nothing". Unfortunately there is still a belief that teachers somehow are qualified to talk and give an opinion in matters of school technology just because they read a couple of articles written by a self professed expert, who most times doesn't have any real experience in building successful school technology programs from the ground up. A standardised one to one program is the answer but requires much more work initialy, however the end result is amazing. One to one takes the technology out of the users day, it just allows them to get on with learning. There certainly is a place for mobile devices but only when tied to a capable and standardised notebook for when its time to get the real work done.

Wed, Nov 16, 2011 Noel Melton NC

Dear Fellow Readers , while I recognize that this article is listed as a Viewpoint, it would be appreciated if the author of the article wasn't plugging her own book and personal viewpoint. While I would like THE JOURNAL to be providing educators with an independant critical assessment, please remember that it is instead a business publication that promotes sales for its advertising sponsors. BYOD is in way too soon of its infancy for any of these to be considered myths or accurate.

Add your Comment

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above

White Papers:

  • Dallas County School District Overcomes Coverage Gaps with MOTOTRBO Digital Radios PDF screen shot

    Dallas County School District needed to quickly resolve their radio coverage gaps throughout the county for more efficient transportation communication and to ensure student safety. Download this whitepaper to see how this district has found their solution with improved coverage area, clear audio and private communications, in addition to improved efficiency and student safety. Read more...