Policy & Funding

Obama Pushes for Education Reform with $4.35 Billion in Competitive Grants

Extra Credit
Race to the Top

President Barack Obama and Education Secretary Arne Duncan, among others, discuss education reform at the United States Department of Education headquarters in Washington, DC.

To view this video full-size, click here. An archive of the complete event is available in Windows Media and Real formats here.

President Barack Obama is calling on states and districts to set higher standards for student achievement. In a speech delivered at the United States Department of Education headquarters in Washington, DC Friday, Obama highlighted some of the top reforms he thinks will help accomplish this and also announced $4.35 billion in competitive grants designed to help support innovative reform efforts.

During the presentation Friday, Obama and representatives from the United States Department of Education outlined the previously introduced Race to the Top Fund and announced that the program will award grants on a competitive basis. U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan also announced the draft application for the program, and a Notice of Proposed Priorities, Requirements, Definitions, and Selection Criteria has been published in the Federal Register.

The Race to the Top Fund, announced in the first quarter of 2009, is designed to help states bolster student achievement through various reforms. It provides $4.35 billion in incentives for states to create "innovative programs" that can be replicated throughout the country.

"Because improving education is central to rebuilding our economy, we set aside over $4 billion in the Recovery Act to promote improvements in schools," Obama said. "This is one of the largest investments in education reform in American history. And rather than divvying it up and handing it out, we are letting states and school districts compete for it. That's how we can incentivize excellence and spur reform and launch a race to the top in America's public schools. That race starts today."

Among the key points in the Obama administration's "race to the top" strategy are performance-based incentives, data-driven decision making, and reforms to the manner in which student achievement is assessed. Obama indicated that reforms in these three areas could help bolster America's competitiveness globally while also helping to narrow the achievement gap between cultural groups within the nation's borders.

"America will not succeed in the 21st century unless we do a far better job of educating our sons and daughters," Obama said. "In an economy where knowledge is the most valuable commodity a person and a country have to offer, the best jobs will go to the best educated, whether they live in the United States or India or China. In a world where countries that out-educate us today will outcompete us tomorrow, the future belongs to the nation that best educates its people. Period. We know this. But we also know that, today, our education system is falling short. We've talked about it for decades, but we know we have not made the progress we need to make. The United States, a country that has always led the way in innovation, is now being outpaced in math and science education. African American [and] Latino students are lagging behind white classmates in one subject after another, an achievement gap that by one estimate costs us hundreds of billions of dollars in wages that will not be earned, jobs that will not be done, and purchases that will not be made. And most employers raise doubts about the qualifications of future employees, rating high school graduates' basic skills as only fair or poor."

He continued: "Of course, as I said before, we've talked about this problem for years. For years we've talked about bad statistics and an achievement gap. For years we've talked about overcrowded classrooms, crumbling schools, and corridors of shame across this country. We've talked these problems to death, year after year, decade after decade, while doing all too little to solve it. But ... that's beginning to change."

He said what the nation's education systems need is both reform and increased funding--not just one or the other. And he challenged leaders and stakeholders to embrace to make it happen by embracing some key "benchmarks" for reform.

"I'm issuing a challenge to our nation's governors, school boards and principals and teachers, to businesses and [not]-for-profits, to parents and to students: If you set and enforce rigorous and challenging standards and assessments, if you put outstanding teachers at the front of the classroom, if you turn around failing schools, your state can win a Race to the Top grant that will not only help students outcompete workers around the world but let them fulfill their God-given potential. This competition will not be based on politics or ideology or the preferences of a particular interest group. Instead it will be based on a simple principle: whether a state is ready to do what works. We will use the best evidence available to determine whether a state can meet a few key benchmarks for reform. And states that outperform the rest will be rewarded with a grant. Not every state will win. And not every school district will be happy with the results. But America's children and America's economy [and] America itself will be better for it."

These benchmarks, Obama indicated, include, among others:

  1. Whether states are designing and enforcing high standards and assessments that are designed to prepare students for higher education and "life." Obama was quick to point out that he is not calling for more assessments like those employed under NCLB. "This is not about more tests," he said. "This is not about teaching to the test. And it's not about judging a teacher solely on the results of a single test." What it is about is still somewhat vague. Obama explained it this way: "It is about finally getting testing right, about developing thoughtful assessments that lead to better results, assessments that don't simply measure whether students can use a pencil to fill in a bubble but whether they possess basic knowledge and essential skills, like problem-solving and creative thinking, creativity, and entrepreneurship."
  2. Whether "outstanding" teachers are being placed in classrooms. He said there's currently no good way of distinguishing "good teachers from bad ones." However, he said, this problem could be approached with more effective data systems, with student test scored being just one criterion among others for determining the effectiveness of a given teacher. "Success should be judged by results, and data is a powerful tool to determine results," he said. "That's why any state that makes it unlawful to link student progress to teacher evaluations will have to change its ways, if it wants to compete for a grant."

The phase 1 funding applications period is expected to open in late 2009, with grants awarded in "early 2010." Phase 2 applications will open in late spring 2010, with grants to be awarded in September 2010. Phase 1 funding recipients will be able to apply for additional funding in phase 2. Likewise, those who are denied funding in phase 1 will nevertheless be able to apply again during phase 2.

According to ED, the department will also announce later this year an additional $350 million competitive grant program to help reform state standards and assessments.

Further information about the Race to the Top Fund can be found on ED's site here.

Comments

Thu, Feb 17, 2011 susan

Here's a link to an idea to educate the public about the critical need for creative, critical thinking skills as part of the No Right Brain Left Behind initiative. If you agree, click the heart on the top to "like" it and maybe we can get this moving. Vote ends 2/19/11. Thank you.Really appreciate it. http://bit.ly/hx6LCZ

Wed, Feb 3, 2010 S.M.S. Philadelphia , PA

Some students do not CHOOSE to fail. There are plenty of students who have special needs, are ESL, learning disabilities, etc. who fail because the teacher does not pay attention to the contexts of their students. They just simply don't care about how many students are actually "getting it", they are worried about standardized test scores because administration has simply put those test scores to the top of the list. And please tell me, are those test scores conducive to the diversity that is located in schools now? I don't think so, therefore, students fail.

Thu, Nov 12, 2009

The problem with education is that we have politicians and other folks in higher places wanting higher standards for education while all along we do not hold students responsible when they choose to fail. Parents blame the teacher, the principal tries to keep the parents happy and the next thing you know the student is allowed to make up work, instead of meeting deadlines, or go to summer school where they cover a small portion of what was covered in a year of class. If we want our students to succeed we must hold them accountable for their actions and not place the blame on everyone else. Stop giving hand-outs and make people accountable for their own actions.

Sat, Aug 1, 2009 David Warlick Raleigh, NC

The fallacy, in my opinion, is in this assumption: "In an economy where knowledge is the most valuable commodity a person and a country have to offer..." It seems to me that it is not knowledge-gained that will be critical in a time of rapid change and the competitive inventiveness that it requires, as much as the ability (skills) to gain new knowledge, or even construct or invent new knowledge. Perhaps we should be aiming beyond how much our children can be taught, to how well they can learn -- a learning lifestyle.

Thu, Jul 30, 2009 Jonathan Humble Kendal England

Terry Smith is absolutely right. Target driven educational policies lead to league tables and end up narrowing the curriculum. We have experience of that here in the UK with over ten years of interference from politicians who have very limited understanding of what really works in education. Children learn when they are engaged in relevant, meaningful and worthwhile activities. Project based learning, involving problem solving and investigations, is an excellent example of such an approach. Which experiences do kids recall as worthwhile in subsequent years; drill/repetition work based on objectives to pass some test, or trips out in practical linked study on a project that has some relevance to their lives?

Wed, Jul 29, 2009 Terry Smith midwest

I have scanned this outrageously long and bureaucratically structured document. I am not sure what is intend to be done by teachers and principals to receive this competitive award, but I do know that those with effective attorneys will likely rake in most of the money, such is the extent of the vague directives. As far as how effective teachers will be determined - this document is wide open for abuse at every level. We can expect very high levels of competition for the cash, and that will mean enormous energies placed on obtaining the proper status, the proper paperwork, the proper "official look." Has any one considered that this country has many mnay high performing schools already? These schools will have no problem attracting the Race to the Top funds. But what about the school really in need? Drilling for the top scores is not education, but it is what will continue to happen to our neediest students given this level of false incentive. Teachers who use interesting projects, who are flexible and change lessons to match student interest and input, who make classes real and connected, will fall short of the data directives. Teachers who track specific data on math scores will drill on those associated objectives and perhaps achieve some slight numeric gain. The numeric gain teachers will get the money, the project teachers who understand socialization and conversation will be hard pressed to show the "data" that supports creative classroom environments. Note: I have taught elementary for 15 years using technology and projects - rarely do consult data sheets for information on my students. I consult my students on a daily basis and plan and replan accordingly. It works. I use my time to be creative, to assess, to plan, to collaborate with other teachers locally and around the world - I do not see skill driven tutoring as having any real effect on learning. People learn when they are engaged, not just because a teacher decides to teach a given set of lessons or ideas.

Wed, Jul 29, 2009 Editor

Actually it appears the PDF can't be accessed directly. I've changed the link to the text version: http://www.ed.gov/legislation/FedRegister/proprule/2009-3/072909d.html . Thank you for the heads up, Mauricio. --David Nagel

Wed, Jul 29, 2009 Mauricio San Bernardino

The pdf for the Federal Register does not work. It is located at: http://www.federalregister.gov/OFRUpload/OFRData/2009-17909_PI.pdf

Tue, Jul 28, 2009 alicia opelousas la

it is so hard to get a job out here so i what you to help me get some school things.

Add your Comment

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above

White Papers:

  • Desktop Virtualization in K-12 Schools: Reducing Costs, Saving Time And Delivering Anytime, Anywhere Access for Students and Staff PDF screen shot

    This paper will show how desktop virtualization can positively position educational institutions for the future, enabling them to reduce expenses through hard dollar savings and time efficiencies while delivering the experience that students, faculty and staff need and desire. Through the experiences of Babylon School District, as well as Manchester Essex Regional School District in Massachusetts and Rockford Public Schools in Michigan, we’ll paint a picture of how desktop virtualization can revolutionize education’s approach to delivering technology — an approach schools can actually afford. Read more...