Federal Education Policy | News

Department of Ed Lays Down Law on Kindle E-Reader Usage

The United States Department of Education and Department of Justice have just issued a reminder calling for colleges and universities--as well as K-12 school districts--to make sure devices such as e-readers that are required in the classroom comply with accessibility laws. The federal action came on the heels of a settlement agreement made by Justice with five institutions that were running Amazon Kindle e-book readers as pilot programs. According to the agencies, Kindle devices aren't accessible to students who are blind or have low vision.

"If we don't consider individuals with disabilities when we integrate new technologies into the educational environment, students with disabilities can and will be left behind as their non-disabled peers gain the benefits of learning that are enhanced by technological advances. This result would be inconsistent with our civil rights laws," said Russlynn Ali, assistant secretary for civil rights for the Department of Education.

Reaffirmation of the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 was delivered as a joint "Dear Colleague" letter. Both sets of regulations prohibit public and private institutions that accept federal funds from discriminating against students with disabilities and preventing them from receiving equal opportunity to "participate in and benefit from" services, programs, and activities available to others. The National Center for Education Statistics estimated about 230,000 college students who were blind, had low vision, or possessed other disabilities affecting their ability to access print information as of the 2003-2004 academic year.

"... [W]e ask that you take steps to ensure that your college or university refrains from requiring the use of any electronic book reader, or other similar technology, in a teaching or classroom environment as long as the device remains inaccessible to individuals who are blind or have low vision," the letter stated. "It is unacceptable for universities to use emerging technology without insisting that this technology be accessible to all students."

The settlement involved Arizona State University in Tempe; Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, OH; Pace University in New York; Reed College in Portland, OR; and Princeton University in New Jersey. The cases began when complaints were filed by two organizations, the National Federation of the Blind and the American Council of the Blind, on behalf of members.

All of those schools have individually entered into agreements with Justice concerning the use of the e-readers in classrooms in which they agree "generally not to purchase, recommend, or promote use of the Kindle DX, or any other dedicated electronic book reader, unless the devices are fully accessible for students who are blind or have low vision." All were participating in projects with Amazon to test the viability of the device in a classroom setting. The terms of the settlements were to go into effect after the pilot programs were finished.

At the time, the Kindle DX being used in the pilot program had a text-to-speech function for the contents of a book, but it didn't have the same functionality for the menu or navigation controls. That meant students who were blind couldn't know which book they'd selected or how to access the Kindle's browser or other functions.

According to Ali, the University of Virginia Darden School of Business is still in negotiations with Justice regarding use of the device. U Virginia's experiment with the Kindle began in August 2009. In May 2010, the school concluded in a preliminary assessment that while it was "excited" to be part of the experiment," most students preferred not to use the electronic reading device, finding it too "clunky" for the fast pace of the classroom.

Some institutions--including Syracuse University in New York and the University of Wisconsin at Madison--chose not to implement Kindle programs until the device was fully accessible to blind users.

Ali said in a press briefing that although her agency doesn't "hold jurisdiction over private companies, through media and other sources and in conversations with settlement recipients, it is our understanding that later this year [Amazon] will be coming out with a fully accessible reader."

Ali declined to state which e-readers currently available comply with the ADA requirements, saying that her agency stays out of the business of endorsing any specific products. "These devices change so rapidly, I can [imagine] any such list as becoming obsolete quickly." She added, "We'll do our best to point [people] in the direction of others that are developing clearinghouse Web sites for these emerging technologies, groups like the National Federation of the Blind."

Currently, the Federation Web site doesn't specifically address e-readers in its list of recommended consumer electronics. However, it does endorse the kReader Mobile, a product co-developed and co-marketed with inventor Ray Kurzweil.

Regarding the Apple iPad, a device that several higher ed institutions have recently announced pilot programs for, Ali said that although her agency hasn't verified its findings, it has heard through sources that "the device is, in fact, fully accessible."

Although the settlements involved higher ed institutions, the principles also apply to K-12, the Department of Education said. "In fact," said Ali, "we're offering technical assistance right now to at least one school district that has come to our attention as interested in using electronic book readers as part of their high school curriculum." Although she didn't name the district, Clearwater High School announced it would be replacing its textbooks with Kindles for 2,100 students next fall.

The Department of Education is providing "technical assistance" to schools with questions about compliance requirements by phone at 800-514-0301 and 800-514-0383 for text phone and via the Web.

Comments

Thu, Jul 1, 2010

All the manufactures would have to do is make a device which would have buttons for disabled to navigate to the correct book using audio. This could even navigate them when downloading their books. This is something that can be done. But for the time being if the text books are opend up to the new technology we could save tons of money in our schools, and save our kids from sore backs carring all these books.

Thu, Jul 1, 2010 Liz

It's not about the read-aloud capability of the ebooks themselves that's at issue. The blind cannot use touch screens. It doesn't help to have read-aloud ebooks if you can't find them on the device - or even turn ON the device. The issue with these readers is that the devices themselves are not accessible - NOT the content they are carrying.

Thu, Jul 1, 2010 Laura C

Maybe LarryJ should read the article before complaining about the DOE and DOJ. As for other commenters' asking if we should banish phyisical books since the blind can't read them -- physical books can be read aloud to vision impared people by special scanning devices. Those devices don't work with eReaders.

Wed, Jun 30, 2010 LarryJ Kansas

The Kindle has a pretty nice text-to-speech capability. Perhaps the DOE and the DOJ should read up a little on e-readers before dissing them.

Wed, Jun 30, 2010 Liz Wilkes

Please remember too that these are textbooks that these schools are trying to put on these devices. It means that students don't have equal access to the information - and yet even students with disabilities are required to take standardized tests, upon which public funding decisions are made. So for a school district, particularly in K12, to adopt a Kindle without allowance for students with disabilities is a form of discrimination that cannot be defended. If an eReader is not assistive-technology enabled - or if other solutions are much more costly - then it should not be considered for school adoptions.

Wed, Jun 30, 2010

It isn't a problem about ED being stupid for banning Kindles, the problem is they don't spend the money to accommodate the disabled students first. Why move forward with the wrong new technology instead of the right technology that include all the students, not just the "non-disabled." It isn't the same as banning books, it just not using government funding to continue to exclude part of the student body.

Wed, Jun 30, 2010

Typical Luddite behavior on the part of a government agency who leaders are appointed.

Wed, Jun 30, 2010

Well if they ban e-Readers that don't accomodate the blind then what about physical books? Should we ban all physical books not written in brail? This is just beyond stupid.

Tue, Jun 29, 2010

More governmental bullshit. Everything that works for normal persons; that is, individuals lacking any type of disability, will never work for all persons with disabilities. The blind can never view print on an e-reader. The solution is not to deprive its use to persons without disabilities.

Tue, Jun 29, 2010 Editor

I won't speak for ED, but I believe the accessibility features in question have to do with navigation and book selection. That is, how does a blind person find the right book and then open it and verify that it's the right book? According to ED: "Kindle devices are not accessible to students who are blind or those with low vision. While many of the devices have a text-to-speech function, which 'reads' on-screen print out loud, they lack menus and controls that individuals who are blind or have low vision can navigate." See "Departments of Education and Justice Announce Continuing Commitment to Accessible Technology for All Students" on ed.gov. --David Nagel

Tue, Jun 29, 2010

kindle offers audio read along so it's actually better than a textbook in most cases. and besides, computers are almost a requirement these days...

Add your Comment

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above

White Papers:

  • Desktop Virtualization in K-12 Schools: Reducing Costs, Saving Time And Delivering Anytime, Anywhere Access for Students and Staff PDF screen shot

    This paper will show how desktop virtualization can positively position educational institutions for the future, enabling them to reduce expenses through hard dollar savings and time efficiencies while delivering the experience that students, faculty and staff need and desire. Through the experiences of Babylon School District, as well as Manchester Essex Regional School District in Massachusetts and Rockford Public Schools in Michigan, we’ll paint a picture of how desktop virtualization can revolutionize education’s approach to delivering technology — an approach schools can actually afford. Read more...