21st Century Skills | Feature

Return to Sender

Schools continue to deliver new graduates into the workplace lacking the tech-based "soft skills" that businesses demand. Experts blame K-12's persistent failure to integrate technology.

In the 2007 report "Maximizing the Impact: The Pivotal Role of Technology in a 21st Century Education System," a task force of leading employers, ed tech advocates, and educators concluded that schools were barely using technology, much less developing the tech skills needed of those entering the workplace.

"To a wireless nation," task force members wrote, "which relies on technology for ordinary tasks and extraordinary achievements, it is shocking and inconceivable--but true--that technology is marginalized in the complex and vital affairs of education."

The upshot of this neglect, the report goes on to say, is to leave students unsuited for a work environment in which knowing core subject content can be secondary to being able to use technology to demonstrate the so- called 21st century skills that employers now demand: "Even if all students mastered core academic subjects, they still would be woefully under prepared to succeed in post secondary institutions and workplaces, which increasingly value people who can use their knowledge to communicate, collaborate, analyze, create, innovate, and solve problems."

The report, published jointly by the International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE), the Partnership for 21st Century Skills, and the State Educational Technology Directors Association (SETDA), was a loud, disruptive clarion call to schools to move purposefully toward the use of technology to develop 21st century skills.

Or it should have been, anyway.

Although some progress has been made in the four years since the release of the report, it's difficult to find anyone who would argue that in their preparation of K-12 students for the technology-fueled, knowledge-based economy they will soon enter, schools are hitting the mark.

High-tech companies are increasingly looking for new hires whose skills go beyond mastery of core content--but by and large are not finding them. Employers are finding that for all of their texting, IM-ing, and downloading, and their fluency with each new gadget, young entrants to the labor force are woefully devoid of the skills that companies need as technology continues to transform the workplace. Work readiness is no longer just about the three R's; now it's also about turning information into knowledge through Web searching and vetting. It's about developing effective multimedia presentations. It's about seamlessly using digital tools to collaborate and problem-solve.

"Since the early 1990s, we've seen a shift away from the routine, because those tasks are largely being automated or outsourced," says Tim Magner, executive director of the Partnership for 21st Century Skills. As a consequence, the skills in high demand now are not exclusively reading, writing, and arithmetic. Magner's organization says United States schools need to fuse the traditional three Rs with the four Cs--critical thinking, communication, collaboration, and creativity--while also making room for problem solving and innovation.

"This is not what our education system was designed to teach," Magner says, "so we need to be more purposeful in embedding these kinds of skills into educational landscapes."

Traditional Skills, Digital Setting
While these so-called "soft skills" have been considered important for some time, he explains, they need to be taught differently if K-12 graduates are to thrive in the tech-infused job sectors they will enter upon graduation. It's no longer enough, for example, to instruct students in spoken and written communication; they also need to be taught how to communicate electronically, including the nuances and etiquette of text, e-mail, and Web interactions. Similarly, collaboration doesn't happen exclusively face-to-face anymore; materials and documents are shared without regard to physical space. Magner said he believes more and more collaboration will be occurring in 3D, immersive environments, so students need to be adept at navigating virtual worlds.

Indeed, observes Don Knezek, CEO of ISTE, what's required of schools is not developing within students a whole other skill set, but simply teaching them to apply to a new arena the ones they already have. "These new skills that we call digital skills are simply cognitive skills in digital settings," he says. Beyond being able to use technology efficiently and productively, Knezek explains, K-12 graduates should understand how to use it to define and break down a problem, look into how similar problems have been solved, and design and implement a solution. In communicating that solution, they should be skillful not merely at typing a Word document but also at telling a compelling story through an interactive multimedia presentation.

Got STEM?

The two fastest-growing occupations in the U.S. economy, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, are biomedical engineers and network systems and data communications analysts.

"Decisions on everything from what people buy to how they vote are now made much less by text or verbal logic than by these visual, persuasive media," says Knezek, whose organization represents more than 100,000 education leaders engaged in advancing the effective use of technology in K-12 and teacher education. Having command of imparting a message through digital media could be a difference maker in the tech-based workplace.

"Today's students could be technologically literate as well as great communicators in traditional settings," Knezek says, "but get the socks beaten off them by someone who has learned to communicate in a digital setting."

While many schools have taken the step of asking students to use digital media in assignments, few are teaching them strategies for doing it well--much less imparting more sophisticated skills such as the ability to use scripts to combine applications, according to Cisco Systems' Charles Fadel. In 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times (Jossey-Bass), a 2009 book Fadel co-authored with Oracle's Bernie Trilling, media literacy is identified as one of three "critical" classes of digital skills for those entering the modern high-tech workplace. Fadel, Cisco's global education lead, says his company wants students to have mastery of multiple digital media mechanisms.

"Ideally, we'd like people to be able to routinely take a database of H1N1 flu cases and overlay that onto Google Maps," he says. "But that's not even being taught in universities."

Fadel and others concerned about the tech skills of the future workforce also emphasize the importance of information and communication technology literacy: a working knowledge of computers and the applications that run on them--everything from e-mail and spreadsheet tools to statistical analysis packages--along with the ability to learn new ones rapidly.

And there will be new ones all the time, given the speed with which technology advances. Being able to gain command of them quickly broadens students' ability to incorporate features that help them produce their best work, says Dan Meyer, CEO of Atomic Learning, a provider of online products that teach educators how to effectively use technology.

"Students should be able to analyze changing demographics in a community by graphing the data in various ways using a spreadsheet, as well as developing hypotheses out of that data," Meyer says. "They should be able to put it into a PowerPoint or some other presentation software and incorporate visual elements."

Then there is information literacy--the ability to sort through the vast amount of source materials now available to anyone with Internet access, and to discern what's trustworthy from what's questionable. "Kids are so used to having reliable information provided for them, but that's not the way it works in the real world," Meyer says. "There is a skill to typing the right question into the search engine and knowing how to discriminate between different sources of information."

"It's different from when you went to the school library and could be confident that the sources were legitimate," adds Eileen Lento, K-12 strategist at Intel. "We need to teach students to be discriminating consumers of information. Can they vet information, pull together different materials, and demonstrate their constructed new knowledge? That's the mother lode."

Collaboration has always been important, Lento notes, but never more so than now, when the growing high-tech sectors are demanding employees be able to work with others on complex tasks. "Most of the problems we need to solve require distributed intelligence," Lento explains. "Innovation occurs at the intersection of different fields of expertise."

For the same reason that working together and bringing multiple areas of expertise to bear on a problem is important, the ability to synthesize disparate approaches through technology is a key skill in an era when disciplinary boundaries are fraying. Pamela Clute, a math professor and assistant vice provost at the University of California, Riverside, who served on a National Science Board panel that authored a report to Congress last September on science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) education, notes that one of the major projected growth fields in the next decade is nanotechnology. A vast frontier of materials, devices, and systems to be created by manipulating objects at the levels of molecules and atoms, nanoscience is expected to drive progress in everything from manufacturing and computers to energy, electronics, and health care.

"This involves integrating the sciences, and it's where K-12 needs to change how it presents content," Clute says. "High school students are taking physics, biology, and math classes as independent silos, and yet employers expect their employees to have the ability to integrate knowledge."

A Core Problem, Too

Return to SenderIntel's Eileen Lento says that schools' failure to supply employers with well equipped new graduates extends beyond a lack of attention to the "soft" skills of problem solving, collaboration, innovation, and the like. Inadequate instruction of core "hard" subject matter--namely in science, technology, engineering, and math--is also a culprit.

"The U.S. isn't creating enough engineers, they're not creating enough math majors, they're not creating enough science majors," Lento says. She cites the fairly undemanding graduation requirements for high school math--passing algebra--which don't align with the far more advanced math skills required in high-tech work environments.

"For the most part, the bar is kind of low," Lento says. "When you're looking at a high-tech industry, or whether you're a software company or a hardware manufacturer, the people who are doing the innovation on the edge clearly have better than algebra skills. So it really is about beeing up the pipeline in those content areas."

Teach Through Technology
What is keeping students from leaving the K-12 system as the idealized profile of the multiskilled, technology-fluent 21st century worker that employers covet? From being expert collaborators, problem solvers, knowledge integrators, and information vetters?

The root of the problem, as spelled out by the "Maximizing the Impact" report four years ago and still true today, is the way K-12 deploys technology in instruction, which is generally inadequate, disjointed, and poorly thought out--or not thought out at all, according to Intel's Lento. Lento says that too many districts invest in technology with neither a long-term vision for how it will be used nor any definition or measurement of success.

"The thinking tends to be that the change is incremental, so you purchase computers and software without thought to what they're going to replace," she says. "Districts feel pressure to modernize, so they buy technology but don't consider its transformative nature. What often happens, then, is computers are used as expensive pencils, and then they wonder why they're not getting different results."

Cisco's Fadel describes three layers of technology implementation in schools. The first is simply teaching about technology use. The second is to teach with technology--embedding technology in the instruction. While many schools have reached that stage, he says, few have moved on to the more advanced level: teaching through technology, such as with simulations or augmented reality.

"Most teachers have gotten to the point where they tolerate technology, but they're not exactly sure where and how to use which technology to its best effect," Fadel says.

So what has happened, Magner explains, is the technology is being diminished. "Much of the emphasis has been on fixing 20th century schools rather than on building 21st century schools," he says. "The mindset is often that we're going to use technology to get really good at delivering instruction the old way rather than for things like providing the flexibility for kids to learn online, doing more project-based learning, and having teachers come together in an interdisciplinary way to create experiences that enable students to explore these digital technologies, while continuing to ensure that they have a rigorous academic experience."

As a result, Knezek laments, students learn a subject such as science in a manner that doesn't resemble the way scientists work. When Knezek learned that his friend, a chemical engineer, was retiring, he congratulated him on "hanging up the lab coat." The friend grinned, shook his head, and said, "No, I'm pushing away from the workstation." He then explained to Knezek he was spending the vast majority of his time in a virtual environment rather than in the lab.

"If you meet someone who tells you his interest is science, ask how much technology he uses," Knezek says. "If he says, 'Not much,' you know that person is a student or a teacher in our school system. If you meet someone who is interested in communications who doesn't use a lot of technology, same thing. I guarantee you it's either a teacher or a student."

Far from learning in a way that resembles the way they will be operating in their future jobs, Knezek notes, students are told while in school to turn off the very mobile devices that are so integral in today's workplace and are typically unable to access expertise outside the classroom.

K-12 education must leave behind the days of teachers delivering lectures in front of the class and instead embrace a more social learning process, Knezek says, one that is more oriented toward the way things get done in the workplace today. Although some progress has been made in moving toward more project- and team-based learning, students continue to be pulled out of that setting when the time arrives to take assessments.

"We don't let them see or hear anyone else, and they certainly can't go online," Knezek says. "With the modern tools we now have, why aren't we assessing them in performance-based, realistic settings?"

In his view, the obstacle is the system of accountability via standardized testing established by the federal No Child Left Behind Act, which has the effect of discouraging innovation in the classroom, as teachers choose to stay with what's familiar to them when faced with student performance mandates. As a result, Knezek asserts, "our measures of performance are horribly misaligned with what's required in the workplace."

Focus on the Risk-Takers
The obstacles to better, deeper, more meaningful technology integration that will better prepare students for the workplace are familiar, but no less formidable: educators' lack of confidence in their own tech skills, fears of how more-tech-savvy students will use technology in the classroom, and a lack of cash.

"School budgets will likely continue shrinking, or at least be flat, for several more years," says Chad Ratliff , assistant director of instruction and innovation projects for Albemarle County Public Schools in Charlottesville, VA. "Tech companies are innovating at a breakneck pace, and we have to be careful not to get caught up in a gadget race."

Ratliff advises schools to invest in tech spending with impact, replicability, and sustainability in mind. He recommends focusing their efforts on classrooms of teachers willing to take risks. "Top-down directives--particularly ones that aim to fundamentally change someone's daily work--are rarely successful," Ratliff says. "We'll have a greater shot at scalability with small wins in key classrooms."

Though it won't be easy, Clute points out that the imperative for K-12 schools to better equip graduates with the tech skills they need to flourish in 21st century jobs could not be clearer.

"If the United States is to stay economically powerful in this global economy, we have to develop the next generation of STEM professionals--young people who are not only good at math and science, but who think creatively and work in teams," Clute says. "The platform for doing that is technology."

Comments

Wed, Mar 30, 2011 Nancy

I find it interesting that the same groups that sound the alarm on our student's deficits in using technology to problem solve, communication, collaborate, etc are also the businessmen that support the Legislative initiates (both Federal and local) that stand solidly behind the use of standardized testing as a "true" measure of achievement. Any educator would tell you that the standardized testing movement is draining our students of creativity and innovation--but NCLB does make a good tool to quantify being punative to teachers!

Wed, Mar 23, 2011 Melissa Michigan

These comments are so true! When will our legislatures wake up and realize standardized testing is failing our students and unnecessarily penalizing our teachers. My teenagers just finished the Michigan tests and every year since upper elementary they have told me countless stories of students just marking up their sheets making a pretty pattern and not even reading the questions. The students think this is a waste of their time, the teachers teach to the test that the students don't even care about and we wonder why our kids aren't learning what they really need to know to be successful in a business environment or even college. How ridiculous this has become and all the government wants to do now is standardize the test Federally and continue on this beaten path. Please lift your voices and make them heard. We need to change now!

Wed, Mar 16, 2011 Joe Connecticut

The questions should be asking how do develop a teacher that has the creative intellect and knows how to apply technology within the classroom? They are not being instructed to know how to perform this task because the graduate schools are not providing the framework. As a teacher of technology processing strong skills in this area (a career changer). It came to my attention that using technology was only another tool to assist in the learning process. Building on that concept and creating a geography lesson build upon using Microsoft's Flight simulator projected the program using a VDT then asked my students to fly a plane (Grade 5) to the destination that was randomly chosen. This created excitement and enthusiastic learning environment. Of course the challenge was the landing…smiles. Some to the other teachers thought that this was playing video games. See my point. Teachers are not thinking out of the box and have been instructed to teach to the test. This is creating a dichotomy within the classroom and challenge for the teachers. Our teachers are capable it is our model that in currently in place within our districts that is preventing creative learning process on the grad level to the district level. My proposed solution: Each district should have a specialist in the area of technology to work along side of the teachers in assisting them with integrating technology into a lesson.

Thu, Mar 10, 2011 Art Willer Canada

I am an educator of over thirty years and a practicing business technology user of as many years who takes a strong exception to the popular belief that (a) technology will change education and (b) that students need different skills today because of technology. True, the context and environment are different from what it used to be, but -- when did people ever not need critical thinking skills, the ability to research information, the ability to discern between reliable and unreliable sources, the ability to collaborate with others, or the ability to communicate well? My point is that education has been focused on developing low level skills ever since it was established because the popular belief is that learning low level skills leads to learning higher level skills. We need facts and basics but higher level skills are only developed in environments that utilize higher level skills. I can do that with a student in the middle of the jungle without a single ounce of technology as long as I know what higher level skills are. Take the technology out of the equation and ask yourself what really needs to be fixed in education and you will find it's the same that has needed to be fixed ever since education became available to the masses. If we are to correct education in this century or any future century, we have to change the way we believe learning occurs regardless of the technology that is or is not present.

Wed, Mar 9, 2011 Tim Vermont

When schools are evaluated by student outcomes on standardized tests as required by NCLB (which students often see as meaningless) or by college matriculation rates often based on SAT/ACT scores, there is little incentive for students to demand the kind of skills training that those at the end of the pipeline supposedly want. When higher ed offers more flexible evaluation of the skills/knowledge that young people have acquired during their primary and secondary years, then perhaps the system that feeds it will be encouraged to evolve.

Wed, Mar 9, 2011 North Carolina

My school is lucky because we have gotten a grant and have good access to technology, but many of the schools in my state do not. And now, the proposed budget for next year cuts technology funds completely. How do we continue to make strides in 21st Century teaching without resources to fix and replace our technology? How do other schools that still do not have adequate computers, projectors, etc meet these needs with NO FUNDING?!!!

Wed, Mar 9, 2011 Ken Metamora, Illinois

NCLB and Rt3 are destroying creativity and innovation in the schools. If we continue in these efforts, the U.S. will lose our leadership position. Using technology will not be given the respect it needs until we start testing for gathering information, analysing the information,using information to make decisions and solve problems, and sharing information and problems with fellow learners. NCLB and Rt3 are based on false data and will not work.

Wed, Mar 9, 2011 LaDawna

Using technology for orgainzing, communicating, research & problem-solving is what school librarians are very familiar with doing and teaching. School librarians teach these skills in direct connection to core content. It would make sense to me that the school community and Partnership for 21st Century Skills (of which AASL is a partner) should recognize the significant gain that could be made if tech teachers, school librarians & classroom teachers would join together to address these problems instead of the educational community ignoring the contributions that librarians have always made to teaching problem-solving & information skills in whatever format...WE TEACH these skills...speak out to keep these important teachers to make sure our students are ready for the workplace, for college, for life!

Wed, Mar 9, 2011

Schools are at a disadvantage! We are held hostage by mandatory state testing that don't measure 21st century skills. In addition, poor urban and rural schools can't afford the technology. Unfortunately, the current state funding cuts don't help!

Wed, Mar 9, 2011 Beckie North Carolina

Here is a case in point. I was a technology facilitator in an elementary school. My job was to help teachers integrate technology into their K through 5 curriculum. When my 5th graders left our school to go on to middle school, they were well versed in word processing, data bases, spread sheets, and powerpoint...and not in isolation, but through real experience based project learning. They had participated in blogging discussions about literature and science with other students. They had developed multimedia presentations to show to their peers to teach a concept. They knew how to video conference. They knew how to use search engines and evaluate what they found on websites through their searches. They could record their project work with ditial cameras. They produced a morning news show for school wide presentation. We were on the right track! But...with budget cuts and money problems...guess whose job was the first to go. Right...the technology facilitator. Now I have been relegated back into the classroom, where there is little time to bother with technology because I am trying to prepare my students to pass a multiple choice standardized test so that my school will "leave no child behind." A teacher assitant is now manning the technology lab and babysits the students while they do "drill and kill" activities in a multiple choice format that mimics the standardized test format. Talk about a waste of resources...

Tue, Mar 8, 2011 Harry Keller Los Angeles

Don Knezek makes several good points. However, he misses the mark on technology in education. Most of our students can probably teach our teachers about using modern technology for things like collaboration. That's not where our problems lie. He used science as an example. I'm a scientist. The real problem lies with learning to think as scientists do. Learning to use technology does not advance that goal. However, educational technology, technology specifically created for learning science, can advance that goal by -- lowering costs of learning, increasing efficiency of opportunities to understand science, and enhancing the effectiveness of teachers. Our future scientists must have the opportunity to do what scientists do daily. While collaboration may be a part of many programs, it isn't the most critical part. Science is a way of thinking that allows scientists to navigate the seas of exploration into the unknown using imperfect tools. That thinking is what our students should learn. Even if these students are not future scientists, that mode of thinking, not intuitive at all, will benefit them years beyond the time when they have forgotten the phases of mitosis. Don't waste technology. Use it well, and it will pay of itself while delivering recurring learning dividends. Use it poorly, and it will drain your resources while not aiding and even occasionally harming your learning goals.

Tue, Mar 8, 2011 Wayne Souther CA

Schools want kids to "type" up their papers, but do not provide key boarding classes so they can learn to type. Just because you can pick up a chain saw it does not mean you can use it properly.

Tue, Mar 8, 2011

The reason teachers don't embrace the way things are done in the workplace today is because they don't know how things are done in the workplace. They have been in the education bubble so long that what "real world" work experience they had is obsolete. Wouldn't it be wonderful if teachers could be given a year's sabbatical every 5 to 10 years that allowed them to get out into the workforce and learn the skills employers need so they can teach them to their students?

Tue, Mar 8, 2011 Bob Wisconsin Public School

Without questions budgets are a challenge but progress can be made by prioritizing what is best for kids. To say that we do not have the money to spend on technology is to say that all the other things funds are used for are more important and critical to the success of children. This might be true but in many, many cases it is not. We have to focus on the really critical areas now and technology is one of them when blended with content areas.

Tue, Mar 8, 2011 Susan Massachusetts

21st century skills are not addressed in the school system I work for because of several reasons. Our computer labs are used for formal assessment in the areas of math and reading for 3 months of the school year. This forces the technology teacher to travel to classrooms that are not equipped to support instruction. In addition to this formal assessment the lab is used for MEPA Testing, again forcing the tech teacher out of the lab. Finally, there is no support in unblocking sites that would be beneficial to our students. In my opinion we have regressed in our efforts to prepare our students for the future.

Tue, Mar 8, 2011 Sara A. South Carolina

Public Schools are in a catch 22. When you have aged buildings with outdated wiring and trying to update to 21st century electronics with access, it can be very costly. When there is little revenue for upgrading or expansion, it is very difficult to keep up. We are doing the best with what we have. There is no magic bullet and no magic formula to fix this. There will always be the "haves" and the "have nots". As educators we have to take what we have and do the very best we can.

Tue, Mar 8, 2011 Chris Toy Maine

Oh my gosh! The fact that schools are failing to teach 21st century skills should come as no surprise to anyone. Why? Because all of the mandated tests assess 19th and 20th century skills. Federal, state and local policymakers need to learn what is needed from Educational leaders at the classroom, school, and district levels. Then work with them to create policies that support 21st century outcomes in sensible ways.

Tue, Mar 8, 2011

"School budgets will likely continue shrinking, or at least be flat... Try non-existent in California. When we are laying off teachers for 3 years in a row it's hard to increase spending on technology. Sure industry wants better qualified people out of school but I don't see much interest in helping schools out. I see more about H1B visas.

Add your Comment

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above

White Papers: