Is Effective Ed Tech Implementation Extremely Important? Depends Who's Being Asked

A new report out from Project Tomorrow revealed a substantial disconnect between teachers and administrators on technology implementations in schools. The report also highlighted a dearth of systemic change resulting from ed tech adoptions.

The report, Teachers' Readiness and Willingness to Adopt Digital Tools for Learning," was released at the ASU+GSV Summit taking place this week in Salt Lake City, UT, with results from the latest national Speak Up Survey, which collected data from more than 500,000 students, administrators and classroom teachers.

Among the findings:

  • District administrators to a much greater degree than classroom teachers say that effective implementation of education technology is "extremely important" to student success (71 percent administrators versus 43 percent teachers). School principals were in the middle at 60 percent.
  • That's not to say teachers were completely dismissive of ed tech. Fifty-four percent said effective implementation is "important" to student success.
  • Only 35 percent of educators see the use of mobile devices as having a positive impact on students' work, though 75 percent of them indicated the devices improve student engagement.
  • Teachers are not using technology in ways that bring about "systemic change" in their practices, such as designing personalized learning "paths" for students, identifying "promising instructional strategies for replication" or working "with individual students on learning goals." Rather, they're using tech for things like parent communications and collaborating with other teachers, which, as the report noted, "are activities teachers have always done and they are very important, but they would do these regardless of technology."
Speak Up Survey 2016 graphic: Importance of effective implementation of education technology

Chart courtesy of Project Tomorrow.

According to the report: "Yes, the chalkboard is a white board and paper and pencils have been replaced with laptops, but other than that? Beyond the physical differences we see in classrooms, the other changes we have seen are minimal — despite the opportunities technology presents to transform learning."

Complete findings can be found on Project Tomorrow's site.

About the Author

David Nagel is the former editorial director of 1105 Media's Education Group and editor-in-chief of THE Journal, STEAM Universe, and Spaces4Learning. A 30-year publishing veteran, Nagel has led or contributed to dozens of technology, art, marketing, media, and business publications.

He can be reached at [email protected]. You can also connect with him on LinkedIn at https://www.linkedin.com/in/davidrnagel/ .


Featured

  • digital graph

    Building Genuinely Data-Informed School Districts

    Schools today generate enormous amounts of data. The difference between collecting it and using it effectively often comes down to quality, access, and context.

  • Neon blue security locks with a single red highlight

    With AI, Cybersecurity Focus Shifts from Finding Flaws to Fixing Them

    For decades, one of cybersecurity's biggest challenges has been finding vulnerabilities before attackers do. A growing number of security professionals now say artificial intelligence is changing that equation, shifting the focus from discovering flaws to fixing them quickly enough to prevent exploitation.

  • Top View Shot in Elementary School Computer Science Classroom

    Education's Top 5 Technology Priorities and the Challenges Standing in the Way

    Cybersecurity ranks as the No. 1 priority for education technology leaders in the United States, according to the latest State of Ed Tech report from CoSN, yet insufficient cybersecurity staffing and the lack of a dedicated budget are key barriers.

  • Engineering team implements digital guardrails on AI

    3 Starting Points for Integrating AI Guardrails in K-12 Districts

    As education leaders start to craft an AI policy that is both practical and flexible enough to evolve with this fast-changing technology, there is at least one principle that should be foundational: AI should serve to augment human critical thinking and creativity but never replace human interaction and decision-making.