How Principal Professional Development Impacts School Outcomes

When the Elementary and Secondary Education Act was reauthorized in 2015, states and schools were given flexibility to use their funds to support principal leadership. However, there is little research on if principal professional development programs really help to improve principals' performance and student achievement, according to the U.S. Department of Education's Institute of Education Sciences.

To gain more insight into the impact of professional development programs, IES funded a large-scale evaluation of one approach at the Center for Educational Leadership at the University of Washington. The program provided principals with 188 hours professional development training over a two-year period and found the program did not change principals' practices in ways intended. The results were published in a study on the IES website.

Researchers found that teachers were less likely to get instructional support and feedback from principals who had received professional development and the same teachers "whose principals received the program were no more likely to report positive perceptions of the usefulness of the feedback provided."

The retention rates for principals who worked in the study schools before the study began had slightly lower teacher retention than schools that did not participate. Students also had similar achievement in English language arts and math whether or not their principals had received professional development.

Chart from study showing effect of principal professional development on student achievement

One hundred elementary schools from eight districts in five states participated in the IES-funded program and the participating principals had five years of experience as administrators on average.

Seventy percent of program hours focused on instructional leadership and gave principals 100 hours more professional development than principals who did not participate during the first year. Participating principals also received 50 hours of individualized coaching to focus on specific goals and analyze the effects of those strategies each year.

The full study is available on IES's website.

About the Author

Sara Friedman is a reporter/producer for Campus Technology, THE Journal and STEAM Universe covering education policy and a wide range of other public-sector IT topics.

Friedman is a graduate of Ithaca College, where she studied journalism, politics and international communications.

Friedman can be contacted at [email protected] or follow her on Twitter @SaraEFriedman.

Click here for previous articles by Friedman.


Featured

  • Human Hand Assembling Digital Data Blocks

    Report: AI Impact Relies on Strong Data Foundation

    High-impact AI implementations are more likely to treat data architecture, governance, and operationalization as strategic requirements, according to the 2026 Blueprint report from TDWI.

  • Businessman using laptop analyzing data and growth graph chart

    Report: AI Budgets in Education Show No Sign of Decline

    The vast majority of education organizations (98%) expect their AI infrastructure budgets to either increase or hold steady over the next year, according to a report from cloud storage provider Wasabi.

  • digital lock with circuit patterns

    IBM Adds New AI-Powered Cybersecurity Tools

    IBM has unveiled an expanded portfolio of AI-powered cybersecurity products, positioning the company to compete more aggressively in a rapidly evolving market where enterprises are increasingly turning to artificial intelligence to defend against automated cyber threats.

  • Wi-Fi icon on dark blue circuit background

    FCC to Conduct 'Top-to-Bottom' Review of E-Rate Program

    The FCC is laying the groundwork for a comprehensive review of its E-Rate program, the federal initiative that provides K–12 schools and public libraries with discounts on internet, WiFi, and telecommunications services to ensure equitable digital access.