School Superintendents to Ed Tech: 'Please Stop'

A Washington state superintendent set off a firestorm of support when she tweeted in mid-March to education companies: "...To every vendor, solution partner, researcher, education advocate, etc. please stop. Just stop. My WA superintendent colleagues and I confronting school closure need to focus on our communities. Let us do our jobs."

Now, a survey of superintendents at other school districts has confirmed the sentiment first expressed by Susan Enfield, who leads Highline Public Schools near Seattle. Nearly half (46 percent) said what they most need from ed tech right now is "to be left alone."

The survey drew responses from 67 superintendents who belong to the National Superintendents Roundtable.

During a period when school system leaders are focused on making sure students get enough food and have the equipment and access they need for remote learning and are trying to figure out plans for the fall, what's not helping, they said, was a "flood of sales calls from technology vendors offering to help."

"What superintendents want most is to be left alone in the middle of this crisis," noted James Harvey, executive director of the Roundtable, in a statement. "They worry that unvalidated products are being marketed to parents and teachers that distract from the district's mission."

According to the survey, the main solution needed from vendors was professional development, to help teachers use the technology that schools already have in place. On a scale of one to six, with six being the most critical, that was ranked 4.1 in terms of importance.

Negative experiences with vendors (mentioned by 32 percent of respondents) have overshadowed the positive ones (20 percent). As one person asserted, "We are now creating a list of which companies we are going to blacklist because of this unethical sales behavior." Said another, "Honestly, there are some vendors I will never do business with in the future because of the crazy amount of emails." Besides, said 54 percent of survey participants, they aren't even the right people to contact regarding district technology needs.

What about all those free software offers promoted by hundreds of companies (and, ahem, this publication)? Two-thirds of respondents (67 percent) said those deals are turning into a "distraction from district mission." "Free offers are helpful, but we need a plan to evaluate what we are using and time to study implementation," one superintendent said. "Who doesn't like free? However, it does distract from our focus if the products aren't vetted first," added another.

A lack of product vetting is also troublesome for free offers made to families and teachers, the survey found. Forty-eight percent of district leaders said they worry about marketing unvalidated products to these audiences, and a quarter (24 percent) said they're concerned that the products and services don't necessarily align with current district programs.

Once those free programs end, most superintendents were pretty sure they won't adopt the new technology. Nearly six in 10 (57 percent) said they would only follow through on purchases after district review; another 17 percent said they wouldn't consider purchase at all. As one respondent bemoaned, "Given the nature of where we will be with district budgets, I don't believe we will be purchasing anything new when this is over."

The overall results of the survey have suggested "that vendors would be well served to step lightly in the current highly charged and difficult environment," the report concluded. Ed tech would be better served, first, by staying out of the way of superintendents as they map a path through the pandemic for their schools and, second, directing their focus on district curriculum directors and information technology specialists. That's the best way, the report stated, to build "trust, respect and reliable long-term markets with school leaders."

The report is openly available on the National Superintendents Roundtable's website.

About the Author

Dian Schaffhauser is a former senior contributing editor for 1105 Media's education publications THE Journal, Campus Technology and Spaces4Learning.

Featured

  • robot typing on a computer

    Microsoft Unveils 'Computer Use' Automation in Copilot Studio

    Microsoft has announced a new AI-powered feature called "computer use" for its Copilot Studio platform that allows agents to directly interact with Web sites and desktop applications using simulated mouse clicks, menu selections and text inputs.

  • AI microchip under cybersecurity attack, surrounded by symbols of threats like a skull, spider, lock, and warning shield

    Report Finds Agentic AI Protocol Vulnerable to Cyber Attacks

    A new report from Backslash Security has identified significant security vulnerabilities in the Model Context Protocol (MCP), technology introduced by Anthropic in November 2024 to facilitate communication between AI agents and external tools.

  • educators seated at a table with a laptop and tablet, against a backdrop of muted geometric shapes

    HMH Forms Educator Council to Inform AI Tool Development

    Adaptive learning company HMH has established an AI Educator Council that brings together teachers, instructional coaches and leaders from school district across the country to help shape its AI solutions.

  • illustration of a human head with a glowing neural network in the brain, connected to tech icons on a cool blue-gray background

    Meta Introduces Stand-Alone AI App

    Meta Platforms has launched a stand-alone artificial intelligence app built on its proprietary Llama 4 model, intensifying the competitive race in generative AI alongside OpenAI, Google, Anthropic, and xAI.